Oklahoma Hague Convention Law
 

Calvin McGraw, et al. v. City of Oklahoma City, et al.

This case concerns the First Amendment rights of citizens in the public square�
specifically on medians in public roads. Oklahoma City Ordinance 25,777 prohibits
standing, sitting, or remaining for most purposes on certain medians. Okla. City, Okla.,
Code ch. 32, art. XIII, � 32-458. Plaintiffs are Oklahoma City residents, a minority
political party in Oklahoma, and an independ... More...
   $0 (08-31-2020 - OK)

Jimcy McGirt v. State of Oklahoma







On the far end of the Trail of Tears was a promise. Forced to leave their ancestral lands in Georgia and Alabama, the Creek Nation received assurances that their new lands ... More...
   $0 (07-09-2020 - OK)

United States of America v. Matthew Lane Durham

Western District of Oklahoma Federal Courthouse - Oklahoma City, Oklahoma

Matthew Durham appeals his convictions and sentence on four counts for illicit
sex with minors in Kenya after travelling there from the United States. This opinion
addresses the following eight issues presented for appellate review.
1. Is 18 U.S.C. 2423(c), the statute on which the convictions
were based, unconstitutional on its face and as applied to Mr.
Durham because it ex... More...
   $0 (08-30-2018 - OK)

Rodger Blanco v. Federal Express Corporation, d/b/a FedEx Express, Justin Digby and Matthew Wainer

In 2014 a FedEx employee stole about $380,000 worth of gold coins and gold bars from a
package entrusted to FedEx for delivery. Almost two years later, the sender, Rodger Blanco,
sued FedEx for negligent investigation and conversion. FedEx moved for summary judgment,
which the district court granted principally because the contract of
carriage required Mr. Blanco to file suit wi... More...
   $0 (07-19-2018 - OK)

United States of America v. John Ray James

Tulsa, OK - Dewey Man Pleads Guilty To $8.2 Million K2 Conspiracy

John Ray James of Dewey, pleaded guilty before United States District Judge Claire V. Egan to his role in a conspiracy related to the purchase and sale of $8.2 million of synthetic cannabinoids, also known as K2, at three retail smoke shops in Tulsa, Owasso and Claremore in violation of 18 U.S.C. 371.

At his chang... More...
   $0 (01-26-2017 - OK)

Barbara O'Bannon v. Odyssey House, et al.

Oklahoma City, OK - Barbara O'Bannon, as the Personal Representative of the Estate of John O'Bannon, deceased, sued Odyssey House, Odyssey Healthcare of Oklahoma, Inc., Odyssey Healthcare, Inc. Odyssey Healthcare GP, LLC, Integris Health, Inc., Hospice of Oklahoma County, Inc., James Blalock, M.D. and Waddah Nadim Nassary, M.D. on a wrongful death negligence theory under 12 O.S. 1053. Plaintiff c... More...   $1 (06-22-2016 - OK)

Keith Cressman v. Michael C. Thompson

In this case, we must decide whether Oklahomas depiction of a Native American
shooting an arrow towards the sky on its standard vehicle license plates compels
Appellant Keith Cressman to speak in violation of his First Amendment rights.
In a prior appeal, we determined that Mr. Cressman had alleged sufficient injury to
confer standing and that he had stated a plausible compelled-s... More...
   $0 (08-04-2015 - OK)

Jeremy Alan Williams v. Anita Trammell

In this habeas case, Jeremy Alan Williams challenges his Oklahoma conviction for
first-degree murder and his accompanying sentence of death. The district court denied
- 2 -
relief but issued a certificate of appealability, giving Williams the ability to appeal his
claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. In addition, this court also agreed to hear
Williams’s sufficiency-o... More...
   $0 (04-10-2015 - OK)

Atrium TRS II, L.P. v. University of Central Oklahoma

¶1 In this breach of contract action filed by ATRIUM TRS II, L.P., d/b/a Renaissance Oklahoma City Convention Center Hotel ("Hotel") against Defendant University of Central Oklahoma ("UCO"), Hotel appeals the trial court's order denying its partial motion for summary judgment and granting judgment in favor of UCO. We reverse the order and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS

¶... More...
   $0 (10-15-2014 - OK)

Dr. Bruce Prescott, et al. v. Oklahoma Capitol Preservation Commission

Oklahoma City, OK - Motion for summary judgment against ACLU lawsuit challenging the constitutionally of placing Ten Commandments monument on public property next to Oklahoma state capitol building sustained by Oklahoma County, Oklahoma District Judge Thomas Prince.

____________________________________________________

Copies of the pleadings and motions filed by the parties are s... More...
   $0 (09-19-2014 - OK)

Bruce Neimi v. City of Tulsa

Bruce Neimi, Eddie Evans, Donald a. Lowe and Dorris M. Orr v. City of Tulsa

Issue # 1.
Issue: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT (DECLARE)
Filed by: NEIMI, BRUCE
Filed Date: 07/08/2011
Party Name: Disposition Information:

Defendant: CITY OF TULSA
Disposed: DISMISSED - COURT ORDER, 08/27/2014. Judge.

Issue # 2.
Issue: DECLARATORY JUDGMENT (DECLARE)
... More...
   $0 (08-27-2014 - OK)

Southwestern Bell Telephone Company dba AT & T Oklahoma v. Flintco, Inc., Manhattan Construction Company, Manhattan Construction Group, Inc. Peterson Contractors, Inc. and USIC Locating Services, Inc.

Southwestern Bell Telephone Company dba AT & T Oklahoma sued Flintco, Inc., Manhattan Construction Company, Manhattan Construction Group, Inc. Peterson Contractors, Inc. and USIC Locating Services, Inc. on negligence theories.

Court's Finds of Fact and Conclusions of Law

1. USIC had a Contract with AT&T to mark its utility lines, including fiber opä cables.

2. USIC empl... More...
   $1 (02-13-2014 - OK)

State of Oklahoma v. Julio Juarez Ramos and Isidro Juarez Ramos

¶1 Appellees Julio Juarez Ramos and Isidro Juarez Ramos were charged in the District Court of Woodward County with First Degree Murder (21 O.S.2001, § 701.7), Case Nos. CF-2009-158 and CR-2009-159, respectively. Separate preliminary hearings were held for each defendant (November 12, 2009, for Julio Ramos and March 12, 2010, for Isidro Ramos), after which each defendant was bound over for trial.... More...   $0 (03-13-2013 - OK)

Olivia Diane Neely v. Event 1 Productions, Inc.

Olivia Diane Neely sued Event 1 Productions, Inc. on an premises liability theory claiming:

1. On September 29, 2010, Plaintift a business invitee, was attending an Oklahoma Municipal League conference at the Cox Convention Center in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

2. The Defendant was contracted by the Municipal League to stage the event.

3. As a part of its duties in staging the ev... More...
   $0 (08-12-2013 - OK)

Kathryn Hagmeier v. American Terrazzo Company

Kathryn Hagmeier sued American Terrazzo Company, American Terrazzo Company, Ltd., Flintco, Inc., Manhattan Construction Company, Tulsa Vision Builders and others on negligence theories.

Plaintiff Kathryn Hagmeier was employed as a sales manager for Superior Management Group (“SMG”) in 2009. SMG manages the Tulsa Convention Center (“TCC”) and the Ba]lk of Oklahoma Center (“BOK”)... More...
   $0 (04-08-2013 - OK)

Cox v. City of Tulsa

APPELLEES' ANSWER BRIEF

This answer brief is jointly filed by the City of Tulsa, Kathy Taylor, the Tulsa Stadium
Trust and the intervening property owners (collectively, when appropriate, the "appellees"). For
the reasons addressed below, this Court should reject the appeal in its entirety.

NATURE OF THE CONTROVERSY

Downtown Tulsa is a clearly delin... More...
   $0 (11-30-2011 - OK)

Board of County Commissioners of Muskogee County v. Lowery

¶1 The issues in the present cause are as follows: (1) whether the County's exercise of eminent domain in the instant cases is for public use in accordance with Article 2, § 23 and Article 2, § 24 of the Oklahoma Constitution and (2) whether the County's taking for purposes of economic development of Muskogee County constitutes "public purposes" within the meaning of 27 O.S. 2001 § 5 to sup... More...   $0 (05-09-2006 - OK)

E & F Cox Family Trust, et al. v. City of Tulsa, et al.

Appellants' Brief
This case involves an objection by certain downtown Tulsa property owners to the creation of the Tulsa Stadium Assessment District. The Stadium Assessment district is approximately 1.5 square miles around downtown Tulsa. The property owners in the district are being assessed $60 million for the purpose of repaying money borrowed by the Tulsa Stadium Trust to fin... More...
   $0 (10-17-2011 - OK)

Todd Ernest Hague v. Mercy Hospital

Todd Ernest Hague sued Mercy Hospital, Kerby Lamb, D.O., and John S. Gilliam M.D. on medical negligence (medical malpractice) and loss of chance theories claiming that he received substandard care in 2007 when he sustained a severe disabling neurological injury and was treated at Southwest Hospital in the emergency room in Weatherford and Mercy Hospital in Oklahoma City.

Plaintiff was ta... More...
   $1 (09-30-2011 - OK)

Ted Evans, Jr. v. Oklahoma Employment Security Commission

¶1 The Oklahoma Employment Security Commission (OESC) appeals the district court's order, filed on March 2, 2009, reversing the Board of Review's decision that denied unemployment compensation benefits to appellee Ted Evans, Jr.1 (Evans) pursuant to 40 O.S.2001 § 2-406, because he was terminated for "misconduct." On appeal, OESC argues that the district court erred because the decision of the Bo... More...   $0 (01-28-2011 - OK)

E&F Cox v. City of Tulsa

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF'S SECOND MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT


COMES NOW Plaintiff in support of Plaintiff's Second Motion for Summary Judgment filed pursuant to Rule 13 of the Rules of for District Court of Oklahoma, and moves for Summary Judgment in this cause in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants and Intervenors.

... More...
   $0 (12-01-2010 - OK)

Thomas Carl Dodds, Jr. v. Randy Richardson

Plaintiff Thomas Carl Dodds, Jr. brought this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 suit, alleging Defendant former Logan County, Oklahoma Sheriff Randy Richardson violated his Fourteenth Amendment due process rights by depriving him of his protected liberty interest in posting bail. The district court denied Defendant’s claim to qualified immunity in the context of summary judgment, and Defendant appealed. Exercis... More...   $0 (08-10-2010 - OK)

E & F Cox Family Trust, et al. v. City of Tulsa, et al.

PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
AND BRIEF IN SUPPORT


             COME NOW Plaintiffs, E & F Cox Family Trust; Michael Samara; T.E. Morlan; Better Price Warehouse Sales Company, Inc.; and Koenig Properties, Inc.; pursuant to Rule 13 of the Rules for District Courts of Oklahoma, and move for Summary Judgment in this cause in their favor and agains... More...
   $0 (04-07-2010 - OK)

Darla K. Price v. Cathryn L. Howard, et al.

¶1 We retained this cause to answer two questions: 1) whether the various defendants/appellees are entitled to the protection of the exclusive remedy provision1 of the Oklahoma Workers' Compensation Act; and 2) if so, whether the actions of the respective parties were sufficient to take them outside that protection under this Court's opinion in Parret v. UNICCO Serv. Co., 2005 OK 54, 127 P.3d 572... More...   $0 (03-16-2010 - OK)

Rajina Hess v. Volkswagen of American, Inc.

¶1 Defendant, Volkswagen of America. Inc. (VW), appeals the trial court's certification of a class action. The question to be decided is whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting class action status. We hold that it did not and affirm.

FACTS

¶2 Plaintiffs, Rajina Hess and Kelly Parsons, each own a Jetta automobile manufactured and/or sold by VW. Each vehicle was pur... More...
   $0 (10-16-2009 - OK)

Board of County Commissioners of Muskogee County v. Edward L. Lowery

¶1 The issues in the present cause are as follows: (1) whether the County's exercise of eminent domain in the instant cases is for public use in accordance with Article 2, § 23 and Article 2, § 24 of the Oklahoma Constitution and (2) whether the County's taking for purposes of economic development of Muskogee County constitutes "public purposes" within the meaning of 27 O.S. 2001 § 5 to suppor... More...   $0 (05-09-2009 - OK)

State of Oklahoma, ex rel. Department of Transporation v. Al "Yogi" Kelly Cole; Bank of America; et al.

¶1 The first-impression issue presented to this Court on certiorari from the three interlocutory orders entered in condemnation proceedings is whether an application to withdraw funds which contains the phrase "pending trial on the issues by jury" constitutes a demand for a jury trial as required by title 69, section 1203 when the condemnor waits almost two years before filing a motion to strike ... More...   $0 (06-16-2009 - OK)

S.L.V.M. Cyndie De Silva v. Paul E. Pitts; Sabrina Pitts

Petitioner-appellant S.L.V.M. Cyndie de Silva appeals the judgment of the district court denying her Hague Convention petition for return of her son, Jonathan, to her custody in Canada and allowing him, instead, to remain with his father in Oklahoma pending a custody determination. After "review[ing] the district court's findings of fact for clear error and its conclusions regarding principles ... More...   $0 (04-05-2007 - OK)

Orhan Yavuz v. 61 MM, Ltd., et al.

Orhan Yavuz, a Turkish citizen, has been involved in various international business transactions with Kamal Adi, a dual Syrian and Swiss citizen, since the early 1980s. Frustrated with the treatment of what he considers an investment in certain real property in Tulsa, Oklahoma (the Tulsa Property), Mr. Yavuz has brought suit against Mr. Adi and others, seeking relief under the federal Racketee... More...   $0 (09-20-2006 - OK)

Orhan Yavuz v. 61 MM, Ltd., et al.

Orhan Yavuz, a Turkish citizen, has been involved in various international business transactions with Kamal Adi, a dual Syrian and Swiss citizen, since the early 1980s. Frustrated with the treatment of what he considers an investment in certain real property in Tulsa, Oklahoma (the Tulsa Property), Mr. Yavuz has brought suit against Mr. Adi and others, seeking relief under the federal Racketee... More...   $0 (09-22-2006 - OK)

Cust-O-Fab Service Company, LLC v. Admiral Insurance Company

Cust-O-Fab Service Company appeals an order of summary judgment granted in favor of Admiral Insurance Company. In this insurance coverage dispute, the district court held the insurance policy between Admiral and Cust-O-Fab did not require Admiral to defend Cust-O-Fab in a Texas lawsuit asserting contract and tort claims.

Cust-O-Fab asserts the district court made four errors: (1) finding... More...   $0 (12-13-2005 - OK)

Jack Young and Debbie Young v. United States of America, et al.

Plaintiffs Jack Young, Debbie Young, Dayle James, and Barbara James purchased property, at a substantially reduced price, adjacent to a superfund site in Henryetta, Oklahoma. They subsequently discovered hazardous substances on their property, but did not take any action to contain or cleanup those substances. Instead, Plaintiffs sued the Federal Government and the City of Henryetta under t... More...   $0 (01-06-2005 - OK)

Alexander; Arnold; Bates, et al v. The State of Oklahoma; The City of Tulsa; The Chief of Police of the City of Tulsa, et al.

On May 31, 1921, and following into the next day, violent attacks destroyed the African-American community of Greenwood, Oklahoma. An angry white mob converged on Greenwood in a devastating assault, burning homes and businesses, killing up to three hundred people, and leaving thousands homeless. In February 2003, Plaintiffs-Appellants, all Riot survivors or descendants of survivors, filed sui... More...   $0 (09-08-2004 - OK)

VICKI L. POOLE; BERT POOLE v. SOUTHWESTERN BELL TELEPHONE L.P., etc.

Plaintiffs Vicki L. Poole and Bert Poole appeal the district court's order dismissing their case because it was filed outside the applicable limitations period. We exercise jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1291 and affirm.

Background

Ms. Poole was employed by defendant Southwestern Bell Telephone L.P. (Southwestern Bell) until she was discharged for cause. She was a member of defend... More...   $0 (12-22-2003 - OK)

Ysbrand v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

This opinion reviews the trial court's determination that this dispute meets the requirements for a class action found at Title 12, section 2023, of the Oklahoma Statutes. The class certification order is affirmed as to the warranty claims asserted but is reversed as to the claim for fraud and deceit.

2 Defendant, DaimlerChrysler, is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of busi... More...   $0 (02-25-2003 - OK)

Verbon Smith and Hazel Smith v. The Baptist Foundation of Oklahoma, et al.

1 The issues presented are: 1) whether all the plaintiffs/petitioners', Verbon and Hazel Smith (collectively, Smiths), claims predating January 1, 1995, against the defendants/respondents, Baptist Foundation of Oklahoma (Foundation/trustee) and Baptist General Convention of the State of Oklahoma (Convention), are time barred; and 2) if timely filed, whether lost insurance premiums may be recovered... More...   $0 (06-25-2002 - OK)

Verbon Smith, et ux. v. The Baptist Foudnation of Oklahoma

1 This is an appeal from summary judgment voiding a trust. The cause has been assigned to the accelerated docket pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 1.36, 12 O.S. Supp. 1999, ch. 15, app. 1. After a review of the record on appeal and applicable law, we reverse and remand with instructions and for further proceedings.

2 Plaintiffs Verbon and Hazel Smith filed this action against Defendants Bapti... More...   $0 (08-15-2000 - OK)

Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: