New York Licensee Law

Lynn K. Pierce v. Target Corporation

Rochester, New York, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a premises liability claim.<br> <br> This case was filed in the Supreme Court, Monroe County, New York, and was removed to federal court by Target Corporation.<br> <br> New York premises liability law holds property owners responsible for injuries caused by dangerous conditions on their property, provided they were negligent ... More...

$1 (10-21-2025 - NY)
Niorqui Almonte v. T.J. Maxx, Inc.

New YOrk, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.<br> <br> "New York premises liability negligence law is based on the principle that property owners have a duty to keep their premises safe for visitors. This duty applies to both business and residential property owners.<br> <br> To establish a premises liability negligence claim in ... More...

$0 (11-09-2023 - NY)
<H2> United States of America v. Industrial Equipment and Supply Company, LLC (IESC), Mark Nystoriak and Sandra Nystoriak </H2>

Albany, New York civil litigation lawyers represented Defendants accused of violating the False Claims Act.<br> <br> Industrial Equipment and Supply Company, LLC (IESC) and its principals, Mark Nystoriak and Sandra Nystoriak, of Latham, New York have agreed to pay $75,000 to resolve allegations that they violated the False Claims Act for selling counterfeit batteries to the federal government on a... More...

$0 (10-31-2022 - NY)
United States of America ex rel. Allen Timothy Yu v. Grifols USA, LLC, et al.

New York, New York whistleblower lawyers represented the Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a qui tam theory claiming that Defendant defrauded the United States of America.<br> <br> "Grifols is a global company that since 1909 has enhanced the health and well-being of people around the world. Our four divisions - Bioscience, Diagnostic, Hospital, and Bio Supplies - develop, produce, and market innov... More...

$0 (01-05-2022 - NY)
United States of America v. Marcos D. Guzman

Rochester, New York criminal defense lawyer represented defendant charged with theft of firearms from a Federal Firearms Licensee, possession of firearms by a convicted felon, and fraudulent representations about the receipt of military medals.<br> <br> Marcos D. Guzman, 36, of Rochester, NY, was charged with theft of firearms from a Federal Firearms Licensee, possession of firearms by a convicted... More...

$0 (10-12-2020 - NY)
United States of America v. Marcos D. Guzman

<center><br> <img width="400" src="https://www.nywb.uscourts.gov/sites/nywb/files/100statest2.JPG"><br> </center><br> <br> Rochester, NY - The United States of America charged Marcos D. Guzman with making fraudulent representations about the receipt of military metals.<br> <br> Assistant U.S. Attorney Brett A. Harvey, who is handling the case, stated that Guzman lied to the U.S. Probation Office a... More...

$0 (07-14-2020 - NY)
United States of America v. Dakota J. Sarfaty

<center><br> <img width="300" src="http://www.nywb.uscourts.gov/sites/nywb/files/100statest2.JPG"><br> </center><br> Rochester, NY - Rochester Man Pleads Guilty In Theft Of Over 90 Guns Taken During Gun Store Burglaries<br> <br> Dakota J. Sarfaty, 22, of Rochester, NY, pleaded guilty to theft of firearms from a Federal Firearms Licensee and possession of stolen firearms. The charges each carry a m... More...

$0 (08-11-2019 - NY)
Great Minds v. Fedex Office and Print Services, Inc.

Plaintiff&#8208;Appellant Great Minds appeals from the March 21, 2017 dismissal<br> under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) of its copyright infringement action<br> against FedEx Office and Print Services, Inc. (“FedEx”) in the United States District<br> Court for the Eastern District of New York (Hurley, J.). We find that Great Minds’<br> public license does not explicitly address wh... More...

$0 (03-21-2018 - NY)
United States of America v. Jamal Smalls

New York, NY - Leading Member Of Bloods Sentenced To 55 Years For Murder, Shooting, And Narcotics Trafficking <br> <br> Jamal Smalls was sentenced today to 55 years in prison for the July 26, 2012, drug-related murder of Doneil White; leading a narcotics trafficking conspiracy that distributed powder cocaine, crack cocaine, and heroin in 2012 and 2013; and using and discharging firearms in connect... More...

$0 (08-24-2016 - NY)
Simmons v. Stanberry

16 Plaintiff Tyrone Simmons appeals from a judgment of the United States District Court for<br> 17 the Eastern District of New York (Irizarry, J.) dismissing his suit on grounds of untimeliness.<br> 18 Simmons, who is a writer and performer of hip-hop music, brought this suit against hip-hop<br> 19 producer William C. Stanberry, Jr., the well-known rapper Curtis Jackson (who performs under<br> 20 ... More...

$0 (01-17-2016 - NY)
WNET, Thirteen v. Aereo, Inc.; Am. Broad. Cos., Inc. v. Aereo, Inc.

The parties below agreed on all but one of the relevant facts of Aereo’s system, namely13<br> whether Aereo’s antennas operate independently or as a unit. The district court resolved that14<br> issue, finding that Aereo’s antennas operate independently. The Plaintiffs do not appeal that15<br> factual finding. Thus the following facts are undisputed. 16<br> I. Aereo’s System17<br> Aereo tra... More...

$0 (09-05-2015 - NY)
Garnett v Strike Holdings LLC

<br> <br> Defendants Strike Holdings LLC and Strike Long Island, LLC (collectively, Strike) operated an indoor recreation facility that contained a go-kart racing track. On December 27, 2003, plaintiff rode as a passenger in a two-seat go-kart driven by her then boyfriend, third-party defendant, Lawrence Nadler. While driving on the track, they were allegedly bumped twice by other go-karts, allege... More...

$0 (09-01-2015 - NY)
WNET v. Aereo, Inc.

2 Aereo, Inc. ("Aereo”) enables its subscribers to watch broadcast television programs over<br> 3 the internet for a monthly fee. Two groups of plaintiffs, holders of copyrights in programs broadcast<br> 4 on network television, filed copyright infringement actions against Aereo in the United States<br> 5 District Court for the Southern District of New York. They moved for a preliminary inju... More...

$0 (04-02-2013 - NY)
Kirtsaeng dba Bluechristine99 v. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

The "exclusive rights” that a copyright owner has "to distribute copies. . . of [a] copyrighted work,” 17 U. S. C. §106(3), are qualified by the application of several limitations set out in §§107 through 122, including the "first sale” doctrine, which provides that "the owner of a particular copy or phono record lawfully made under this title . . . isentitled, without t... More...

$0 (03-19-2013 - NY)
Alan Kachalsky v. County of Westchester

2 This appeal presents a single issue: Does New York's<br> 3 handgun licensing scheme violate the Second Amendment by<br> 4 requiring an applicant to demonstrate "proper cause” to<br> 5 obtain a license to carry a concealed handgun in public?<br> 6 Plaintiffs Alan Kachalsky, Christina Nikolov, Johnnie<br> 7 Nance, Anna Marcucci-Nance, and Eric Detmer (together, the<br> 8 "Plaintiffs”) ... More...

$0 (11-28-2012 - NY)
WPIX, Inc. v. IVI, Inc.

In this case, plaintiffs-appellees -- producers and owners of copyrighted television programming -- sued defendants-appellants ivi, Inc. ("ivi") and its Chief Executive Officer, Todd Weaver, for streaming plaintiffs' copyrighted television programming over the Internet live and without their consent. The district court granted a preliminary injunction for plaintiffs, holding that: (1) plaintiffs w... More...

$0 (08-29-2012 - NY)
Jonathan Nnebe v. Matthew Daus

The named plaintiffs in this putative class action, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, are the New York Taxi Workers Alliance ("NYTWA” or "Alliance”) and four New York City taxi drivers whose licenses to drive yellow cabs were automatically suspended when they were arrested on criminal charges. It is the policy of the City of New York ("City”) and its Taxi and Limousine Com... More...

$0 (03-30-2011 - NY)
Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission

This petition for review comes before us on remand from the Supreme Court. Previously we held, with Judge Leval dissenting, that the indecency policy of the Federal Communications Commission ("FCC” or "Commission”) was arbitrary and capricious under the Administrative Procedure Act ("APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A). See Fox Television Stations, Inc. v. FCC, 489 F.3d 444, 462 (2d C... More...

$0 (07-13-2010 - NY)
Monroe S. Harris, B.S., D.O. v. Richard P. Mills, Commissioner of Education, Merryl H. Tisch, Regent Chancellor, David A. Paterson, Governor

Monroe S. Harris appeals from a judgment of the United<br> 22 States District Court for the Southern District of New York<br> 23 (Victor Marrero, Judge). Harris was formerly licensed by the<br> 24 state of New York as a doctor of osteopathic medicine; his<br> 25 medical license was revoked because he was found to have<br> 26 committed fraud and engaged in improper medical practices. At<br> 27 issu... More...

$0 (07-09-2009 - NY)
Vacold, LLC, Immunotherapy, Inc. v. Anthony Cerami, Carla Cerami, VLN, LLC and Cerami Consulting Corporation

15 Immunotherapy, Inc. and its successor in interest, Vacold LLC (together,<br> 16 "Immunotherapy”), appeal from a judgment of the United States District Court<br> 17 for the Southern District of New York (Richard M. Berman, J.) in favor of<br> 18 Immunotherapy's former business partner, Cerami Consulting Corporation<br> 19 ("CCC”) and its affiliates, Anthony Cerami, Carla Cerami, and ... More...

$0 (10-02-2008 - NY)
Oleg Rivkin v. Century 21 Teran Realty, LLC, et al.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has certified a question that calls upon us to explore the scope of the fiduciary duty owed by buyer's agents affiliated with a real estate brokerage firm when their principals bid on the same property. We begin with the facts, which are substantially undisputed. <P> I. <P> On May 24 or 25, 2004, Oleg Rivkin, a New Jersey resi... More...

$0 (04-26-2008 - NY)
<a href="https://www.tourolaw.edu/2ndCircuit/June02/01-7011.html" target="_new">Times Mirror Magazine, Inc. v. Field & Stream Licenses Company & Jerome V. Lavin</a>

Times Mirror Magazines, Inc. ("TM") owns and publishes Field & Stream Magazine. TM, 1 and its predecessor in interest, the Columbia Broadcasting System ("CBS"), entered into a series of agreements with defendants to govern the use of the name Field & Stream as a trademark. At the core of this appeal lies TM's contention that the agreements left TM with a residual common law right to use the mark i... More...

$1031073 (06-28-2002 - NY)
<a href="https://www.tourolaw.edu/2ndCircuit/June02/01-7954.html" target="_new">Patricia C. Anderson, et al. v. Alexander F. Treadwell</a>

This appeal requires us to decide whether a state's regulation of residential real estate solicitations by licensed real estate salespersons violates their free speech rights under the First Amendment. Defendant-Appellant Alexander Treadwell, New York's Secretary of State, appeals from the June 29, 2001, judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Thomas C. P... More...

$0 (06-27-2002 - NY)
<a href="https://www.tourolaw.edu/2ndCircuit/January02/00-9553.html" target="_new">Kathleen Gibbs-Alfano and Thomas Alfano v. The Osining Boat & Canoe Club, Inc., et al.</a>

This case presents the thorny issue whether New York and federal law permit town council members to obtain indemnification under a license agreement. They allegedly failed to investigate charges of racial discrimination levied against the town's licensee, a private "boat and canoe" club. Both the council members and the club, separately and without admitting liability, settled the claims against t... More...

$0 (01-31-2002 - NY)
<a href="https://www.tourolaw.edu/2ndCircuit/March02/01-7912.html" target="_new">Random House, Inc. v. Rosetta Books LLC, et al.</a>

Random House, Inc. appeals from the denial of a preliminary injunction that sought to enjoin appellee Rosetta Books LLC ("Rosetta") from continuing to sell as "ebooks" certain novels whose authors had granted Random House the exclusive right to publish, print, and sell their copyrighted works "in book form." The denial of a preliminary injunction is generally reviewed for abuse of discretion. See ... More...

$0 (03-08-2002 - NY)