Missouri FMLA Law

Mary Sisk v. Picture People, Inc.

Mary Ellen Sisk sued her former employer The Picture People, Inc. for retaliation in violation of the Family and Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2615(a)(2). At the close of her case-in-chief, the district court granted Picture People's motion for judgment as a matter of law. Having jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court affirms.<br><br>In March 2000, Sisk began with Picture People as... More...

$0 (02-28-2012 - MO)
Breckenridge O'Fallon v. Teamsters Union Local No. 682

Breckenridge O'Fallon, Inc. ("Breckenridge”), produces ready-mix concrete.<br><br>Breckenridge employee Ron Eguia injured his back driving a ready-mix truck. After treatment, Eguia's physician released him to work with no lifting restrictions. Acting on opinions by two other physicians that Eguia should be subject to permanent lifting restrictions below the minimum physical requirements of t... More...

$0 (01-09-2012 - MO)
Charity Wierman v. Casey's General Stores

Charity L. Wierman sued her former employer, Casey's Marketing Company and Casey's General Stores, Inc. ("Casey's”). She asserts pregnancy discrimination in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e–2000e-17) and the Missouri Human Rights Act (Mo. Rev. Stat. § 213.055) ("MHRA”). She also alleges retaliation in violation of the Family and... More...

$0 (03-31-2011 - MO)
Susan Murphy v. FedEx National LTL, Inc.

Appellant Susan Murphy sued her former employer, FedEx National LTL, Inc. ("FedEx"), claiming that FedEx violated the Family Medical Leave Act ("FMLA"), 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq., when it fired her after representing to her that it had granted her leave. The district court submitted Murphy's FMLA claim to a jury on an estoppel theory, and the jury returned a verdict for Murphy. The district cour... More...

$0 (08-26-2010 - MO)
Michael Reed v. Lear Corporation

On January 5, 2006, Michael Reed sued his former employer, the Lear Corporation ("Lear”), under the Family and Medical Leave Act ("FMLA”). See 29 U.S.C. § 2601 et seq. He alleged that Lear violated the FMLA when it fired him for absences he incurred in reliance on Lear's representation to him that he was on provisional FMLA leave. On January 31, 2008, the district court1 granted Lea... More...

$0 (02-16-2009 - MO)
Larry McKlintic v. 37th Judicial Circuit Court, et al.

<P>Larry McKlintic appeals from the district court's1 dismissal of his suit against his employer, the 36th Judicial Circuit Court of the State of Missouri, seeking relief under the provisions of the Family and Medical Leave Act (known as the FMLA) granting a right to leave on account of the employee's own illness (known as the selfcare provisions of the Act). The district court held that McKli... More...

$0 (12-09-2007 - MO)
<a href="http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/02/09/013772U.pdf" target="_new">Kathleen M. Roche v. St. Lukes Shawnee</a>

Kathleen Roche appeals the district court's1 grant of summary judgment on her disability discrimination and rehabilitation claims against her employer, Saint Lukes Shawnee Mission Health Systems (Saint Lukes) based on the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794, the Missouri Human Rights Act (MHRA), Mo. Rev. Stat. § 287.780, the Family Medical Leave Act, 29 U.S.C. § 2601, and Missouri's worker's... More...

$0 (09-27-2002 - MO)
<a href="http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/02/08/021056U.pdf" target="_new">Kathryn R. Harris v. Emergency Providers</a>

Kathryn R. Harris, appeals the District Court's 1 adverse grant of summary judgment in her action against her former employer, Emergency Providers, Inc. (EPI), and union, International Association of Firefighters, Local No. 1-34 (IAFF). Harris claimed violations of the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA), section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, and state law. She based her claims on ... More...

$0 (08-28-2002 - MO)
<a href="http://www.osca.state.mo.us/courts/pubopinions.nsf/ccd96539c3fb13ce8625661f004bc7da/5f1b2ccd5af1b01686256be20079c4e3?OpenDocument" target"_new">Dorinda Craig v. Missouri Department of Health, et al</a>.

Dorinda Craig brought suit against the Missouri Department of Health (MDH) alleging a violation of her rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).(FN1) After a protracted procedural history, the case was dismissed by the circuit court. The judgment of the circuit court is reversed and the case is remanded. <P> <center>I.</center> <P> Craig's original ADA suit was filed in Cole Coun... More...

$0 (06-26-2002 - MO)
<a href="http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/02/04/012006P.pdf" target="_new">Susan C. Darby v. Floyd Bratch</a>

Susan Darby brought this action alleging that the defendants, the Kansas City, Missouri, Police Department, the Kansas City Board of Police Commissioners, the City of Kansas City, Missouri, and several individual employees,3 violated the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12112(a), and the Missouri Human Rights Act, Mo. Rev. Stat. § 213.055 (2000). She also claimed that the defendan... More...

$0 (04-11-2002 - MO)