Minnesota Licensee Law
<h1> United States of America v. Donald Duane Armstrong, Jr. </h1>
<font color="red"><b><h2><center> Minneapolis, Minnesota criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with an illegal firearm straw purchasing conspiracy </font </color="red"></b></center></i></i><b><center></i><br> <b> </b> Cass County Felon Sentenced to Prison for Straw Purchasing</h2></center></b></b> </h2></center></b><br> <br> A convicted felon has been sentenced to 2... More...
$0 (09-19-2024 - MN)<h1> United States of America v. Ladarius Jaleel Snipes </h1>
<b><h2><center><font color="red"><i> Saint Paul, Minnesota Criminal Defense Lawyer represented the Defendant Sentenced to Prison for a Violent Hobbs Act Robbery and Firearms Violations</b></h2></center></i></font color="red"></i><br> <br> <b><h2><center><i></b>District of Minnesota </h2></center></i><br> <br> A Mississippi man has been sentenced to 155 months in prison followed by five years of... More...
$0 (01-05-2024 - MN)United States of America v. Matthew Scott White
St. Paul, Minnesota arson charge criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant.<br> <br> On May 28,2020 Matthew Scott White, 31, entered the Enterprise Rent-A-Car building located in St. Paul, Minnesota and started a fire in the back office that completely destroyed the building. White fueled the fire by throwing papers and other flammable items onto the flames. As White exited the building, he to... More...
$0 (06-18-2021 - MN)United States of America v. Andrew Albert Comeaux
Minneapolis, Minnesota felony firearm possession criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant, Andrew Albert Comeaux, age 38, who was charged with once count of felony in possession of a firearm.<br> <br> According to COMEAUX's guilty plea and documents filed with the court, on June 15, 2020, multiple law enforcement agencies executed a search warrant at COMEAUX's residence. During the search, la... More...
$0 (02-09-2021 - MN)State of Minnesota vs. Jerry Expose, Jr.
This case requires us to determine whether the therapist-client privilege, which <br> prohibits therapists from disclosing information or opinions in court that they acquired <br> from their clients in a professional capacity, contains an exception for threatening <br> statements. The district court concluded that the privilege does not apply to “statements <br> of imminent threat of harm.” ... More...
$0 (12-09-2015 - MN)Laboratory Corporation of America Holdings v. Metabolite Laboratories, Inc.
Metabolite appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado's grant of summary judgment. See Lab. Corp. of Am. Holdings v. Metabolite Labs., Inc., 571 F. Supp. 2d 1199 (D. Colo. 2008). The district court granted LabCorp's motion for summary judgment on its complaint for declaratory judgment that it did not breach a license agreement for failure to pay know-how royalties o... More...
$0 (03-10-2010 - MN)Wayne J. Kratzer vs. Welsh Companies, LLC
Respondent Wayne Kratzer brought this action against his former employer, Welsh Companies, LLC (Welsh), alleging that Welsh terminated his employment in violation of Minnesota"s whistleblower statute, Minn. Stat. § 181.932, subd. 1(a) (2008).1 The district court granted Welsh"s summary judgment motion, but the court of appeals reversed. Kratzer v. Welsh Cos., No. A06-2284, 2008 WL 1747607, at *... More...
$0 (07-30-2009 - MN)Minneapolis Taxi Owners v. City of Minneapolis
In 2006, the City of Minneapolis (the "Cityâ€) amended its taxicab ordinance to uncap the number of transferable taxicab licenses it issues, thereby opening a previously restricted market. The Minneapolis Taxi Owners Coalition (the "Coalitionâ€), a group comprising holders of approximately seventy-five transferable taxicab licenses, sued the City, asserting federal and state constitution... More...
$0 (07-14-2009 - MN)Gander Mountain Company v. Cabela's Inc.
This case arose from a contract dispute involving a 1996 transaction between Gander Mountain Co.1 and Cabela's, Inc. Gander Mountain filed suit against Cabela's seeking a declaration that a particular provision of the agreement, the Contingent Trademark License provision ("CTLâ€), was unenforceable. Cabela's counterclaimed, seeking a declaration that the provision was enforceable and requesti... More...
$0 (08-28-2008 - MN)<a href="http://fedcir.gov/opinions/06-1077.pdf" target="_new">Transclean Corporation, et al. v. Jiffy Lube International, Inc., et al.</a>
<P>Transclean Corporation, James P. Viken, Jon A. Lang, and Donald E. Johnson (collectively "Transclean") brought suit against Bridgewood Services, Inc. ("Bridgewood"), alleging that the automatic transmission fluid changing machine manufactured and sold by Bridgewood, the "T-Tech machine," infringed Transclean's patent. Transclean obtained a judgment in its favor, including a damages award of $1,... More...
$0 (03-21-2007 - MN)<a href="http://www.fedcir.gov/opinions/06-1077.pdf" target="_new">Transclean Corporation, et al. v. Jeffy Lube International, Inc., etc.</a>
<P> Transclean Corporation, James P. Viken, Jon A. Lang, and Donald E. Johnson (collectively "Transclean") brought suit against Bridgewood Services, Inc. ("Bridgewood"), alleging that the automatic transmission fluid changing machine manufactured and sold by Bridgewood, the "T-Tech machine," infringed Transclean's patent. Transclean obtained a judgment in its favor, including a damages award of $... More...
$0 (01-27-2007 - MN)<a href="http://www.courts.state.mn.us/opinions/sc/current/OPC6022117-0722.htm" target="_new">David M. Pietsch, D.C., et al. vs. Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners</a>.
<P>David Pietsch, D.C., seeks review of a decision of the court of appeals affirming the Minnesota Board of Chiropractic Examiners' (the Board) disciplinary action against him based on the Board's conclusion that he engaged in unprofessional conduct in violation of Minn. Stat. § 148.10, subd. 1(a)(11) and (e) (2002). We reverse and remand. <P> Pietsch, a Doctor of Chiropractic, owns and operat... More...
$0 (07-26-2004 - MN)<a href="http://www.ca8.uscourts.gov/opndir/04/03/031772P.pdf" target="_new">Andrew Carlson v. First Revenue</a>
<P>Andrew Carlson appeals from a summary judgment entered against him and from the denial of his motion to alter or amend the judgment, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e), in his action against First Revenue Assurance (FRA), a collection agency. We affirm the district court's1 orders.<P>I.<P>This case arises out of FRA's debt collection activities with regard to an alleged debt that Mr. Carlson owed to... More...
$0 (03-03-2004 - MN)