Indiana Hague Convention Law
Jennifer Finnerty v. NCAA
Indianapolis, Indiana personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence theory. <br> <table><br> <h1><br> <center><br> <P><br> <img width="300" src="http://www.morelawtv.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Indianapolis_IN_State.jpg" alt="State Courthouse - Indianapolis, Indiana"><br> <P><br> State Courthouse - Indianapolis, Indiana</a><br> <P><br> <a font="red" href="http... More...
$0 (02-17-2023 - IN)Maria L. Cole v. Peter G. Cole
<center><font color="red"><h2><fontcolor="red"> Indianapolis, IN - Divorce lawyer represented Appellant with appealing the court's determination that her children should reside in Germany. </h2></font></b></i></font></center></center>d<br> <br> The facts before the trial court were based only on a paper record.2 According to <br> the parties' submissions, Peter G. Cole ("Fatherâ€) is a citi... More...
$0 (05-04-2022 - IN)Tyson Timbs v. Indiana
<center><br> <img width="300" src="https://www.supremecourt.gov/about/images/CourtBuilding.jpg"><br> </center><br> <br> Tyson Timbs pleaded guilty in Indiana state court to dealing in a controlled substance and conspiracy to commit theft. The trial court sentenced him to one year ofhome detention and five years of probation, which included a court-supervised addiction-treatment program. The senten... More...
$0 (02-21-2019 - IN)<b>GARY MARTIN V. STEPHEN O'DANIEL AND MIKE SAPP V. STEPHEN O'DANIEL AND BOBBY MOTLEY V. STEPHEN O'DANIEL </b></h2.
Stephen O'Daniel is a retired Kentucky State Police (KSP) officer. He was <br> employed by the Justice and Public Safety Cabinet as Executive Director of the <br> Office of Investigations when he purchased what was purportedly a 1974 <br> Chevrolet Corvette. After discovering that the vehicle was actually a 1975 <br> Corvette, O'Daniel sought the assistance of Detective Riley of KSP's stolen <br> ... More...
$0 (09-26-2016 - IN)Christopher Tiplick v. State of Indiana
Synthetic cannabinoids, also known as “spice,” are compounds designed to mimic the psychoactive properties of marijuana, first reported in the United States in 2008. See Schedules of Controlled Substances: Temporary Placement of Three Synthetic Cannabinoids Into Schedule I, 78 Fed. Reg. 28,735–39 (May 16, 2013) (to be codified at 21 C.F.R. pt. 1308.11(h)(9)–(11)). Regulation of “spice�... More...
$0 (01-25-2016 - IN)Christopher Tiplick v. State of Indiana
Synthetic cannabinoids, also known as “spice,” are compounds designed to mimic the psychoactive properties of marijuana, first reported in the United States in 2008. See Schedules of Controlled Substances: Temporary Placement of Three Synthetic Cannabinoids Into Schedule I, 78 Fed. Reg. 28,735–39 (May 16, 2013) (to be codified at 21 C.F.R. pt. 1308.11(h)(9)–(11)). Regulation of “spice�... More...
$0 (10-13-2015 - IN)Common Cause Indiana v. Individual Members of the Indiana Election Commission
Indiana Code § 33-33-49-13 (“the Statute” or “the Partisan Balance Statute”) establishes the system for the election of judges to the Marion Superior Court in Marion County, Indiana. This system is unique in Indiana, as it is the only office where primary election voters do not vote for as many candidates as there are persons to be elected to that office in the general election. See Ind. ... More...
$0 (09-13-2015 - IN)Cung Hnin v. TOA (USA), LLC
On January 25, 2012, Cung Hnin ("Hninâ€) filed a four-count Complaint against his former<br> <br> 2 No. 13-3658<br> <br> employer TOA (USA), LLC ("TOAâ€) alleging violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000, et seq., pursuant to the district court's original jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1331, and two state law claims pursuant to the dis-trict court's supp... More...
$0 (05-05-2014 - IN)Wanda Goodpaster v. City of Indianapolis
Appellants, who own bars in Indianapolis-Marion County, Indiana, filed suit seeking injunctive and declaratory relief against enforcement of the<br><br>2 No. 13-1629<br><br>2012 Indianapolis-Marion County smoking ordinance. The district court denied the bar owners' motion for a preliminary and permanent injunction and entered judgment in favor of the City. The bar owners now appeal.<br><br>I. BACK... More...
$0 (11-25-2013 - IN)Emilio Martino v. Western & Southern Financial Group
Emilio Martino, a naturalized United States citizen born in Italy, worked briefly as a sales representative for Western & Southern Financial Group ("W&Sâ€). Less than two months after W&S hired Martino, the company terminated his employment.<br><br>Martino sued W&S for religious discrimination under Title VII and for defamation. Martino alleged, among other claims, that W&S discharged him bas... More...
$0 (04-25-2013 - IN)Boimah Flomo v. Firestone Natural Rubber Co., LLC
This suit under the Alien Tort Statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1350, pits 23 Liberian children against the Firestone Natural Rubber Company, which operates a 118,000-acre rubber plantation in Liberia through a subsidiary; various Firestone affiliates and officers were also joined as defendants. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of all the defendants, but the plaintiffs have appealed onl... More...
$0 (07-11-2011 - IN)Torrey Bauer v. Randall T. Shepard
The Supreme Court held in Republican Party of Minnesota v. White, 536 U.S. 765 (2002) (White I), that elected judges, and candidates for judicial office, have a right under the first amendment to declare their legal views to the electorate during their campaigns. The decision left open myriad questions of implementation, and litigation has ensued across the country in those states that give the vo... More...
$0 (08-20-2010 - IN)Yao-Wen Chang, et al. v. Baxter Healthcare Corporation, et al.
This is a parallel case to Abad v. Bayer Corp., 563 F.3d 663 (7th Cir. 2009), decided by this panel last year. The case was dismissed by the district court, and the plaintiffs have appealed. Ordinarily when all parties to an appeal are represented by counsel, the court directs oral argument unless the parties waive argument and we accept the waiver. But when, as in this case, an appeal is closely ... More...
$0 (03-26-2010 - IN)Jack Bell,e t al. v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.
Pursuant to section 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185(a), the plaintiffs-appellants brought suit in the district court alleging that defendant-appellee DaimlerChrysler Corporation ("Chryslerâ€) breached its contractual obligations to certain workers laid off in the late 1970s and early 1980s by failing to recall these workers for job openings at Chrysler's plants i... More...
$0 (10-29-2008 - IN)Sofia Lopez De Manez, et al. v. Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire, LLC, et al.
This appeal arises out of one of the many cases that were filed against Ford Motor Company and Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. (now known as Bridgestone Firestone North American Tire, LLC), after some Firestone tires installed on Ford Explorers exploded, often with catastrophic consequences. Although most of those lawsuits involved U.S. citizens who were driving their cars within the United States, a ... More...
$0 (07-17-2008 - IN)Debbie A. Peidick v. Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis Athletic Department, et al.
<P>During Debbie Peirick's thirteenth and final year as head coach of the women's tennis team at Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis (IUPUI), her team maintained the highest grade point average of all athletic teams, achieved its best season in history, and, for the first time, qualified for the NCAA tournament. Despite this record, Peirick, then age fifty-three, was fired whe... More...
$0 (12-17-2007 - IN)<a href="http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/archive/11220201.rdr.html" target="_new">Jordan v. Deery</a>
<P>This medical malpractice action involving a disabled child has generated three appellate court opinions, an emergency stay and hearing in the Court of Appeals, and an original action in this Court. In this ongoing litigation we hold today that Article I, Section 20 of the Indiana Constitution, which provides that “[i]n all civil cases, the right of trial by jury shall remain inviolate,... More...
$0 (11-22-2002 - IN)<a href="http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/archive/10070202.rdr.html" target="_new">Stronger v. Sorrell</a>
Three years after the trial court awarded custody of the parties’ minor children to the mother, the father filed a Trial Rule 60(B) motion to set aside the judgment on grounds of fraud on the court. The trial court denied the motion, and the Court of Appeals reversed. Having previously granted the mother’s petition to transfer, we now affirm the trial court. <P> Facts and Proce... More...
$0 (10-07-2002 - IN)