Indiana Garnishment Law
<a href="http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/archive/08150002.msm.html" target="_new">Wallace L. Hogle v. Shireley A. Hogle</a>
<P>Wallace Hogle appeals the trial court's entry of a Qualified Domestic Relations Order ("QDRO"). He raises a single issue on appeal, which we restate as whether the trial court properly entered, some twenty years after the parties' marriage was dissolved, a QDRO which transfers to Wallace's former wife, Shirley Hogle, benefits from Wallace's pension plan in order to satisfy a California judgment... More...
$0 (08-15-2000 - IN)<a href="http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/archive/07180205.cld.html" target="_new">Wyzard v. Wyzard</a>
Wife and Husband married on June 26, 1965. They had one child, a daughter, born in 1971. On March 23, 1999, Husband filed for dissolution. Since April 1, 1970, Husband had worked as a firefighter for the City of New Albany. During that entire time, Husband also held a second part-time job. Throughout the long marriage, Wife also worked outside the home. The parties' joint income derived approximat... More...
$0 (07-18-2002 - IN)<a href="http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/completed/01090301.pds.html" target"_new">Keaton v. Fort Wayne Neurosurgery</a>
<a href="http://www.morelaw.com/lawyers" target "_new">Paul Keaton</a>, an attorney from Fort Wayne, Indiana, was hired by Marjorie Wojcik to represent her in a personal injury claim arising out of an accident in which she was injured. It appears, although it is not clear, that as a result of the injuries Wojcik received in the accident, she received treatment from Fort Wayne Neurosurgery. Wojcik... More...
$0 (01-09-2003 - IN)<a href="http://www.in.gov/judiciary/opinions/archive/02210201.rts.html" target="_new">State Farm Fire & Casualty Company v. T.B., a minor by her parents and next friend, George Bruce and Cathy Bruce</a>
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company declined to represent an insured homeowner in a suit brought by a child whom the insured's husband molested during daycare in the insured's home. The insured agreed to a consent judgment of $375,000, with the stipulation that none of it would be collected from the homeowner, and assigned all policy rights to the child. The trial court entered the judgment. It l... More...
$0 (02-12-2002 - IN)<a href="http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/op3.fwx?submit1=showop&caseno=01-2132" target="_new">Lisa Ann Feltner v. Title Search Company</a>
Title Search Company appeals the district court's entry of a contempt and sanctions order after finding that Title Search violated an injunction preventing relitigation in state court of certain issues previously decided in federal court. Because the district court was well within its discretion to hold Title Search in contempt and sanction it, we affirm the judgment of the district cour... More...
$0 (03-12-2002 - IN)