Statute of Limitation Law
 
United States of America v. Frank Nappo

Corcord, New Hampshire criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1349. Rye man Frank Nappo, 56, owned Op4G and Slice market research companies based in New Hampshire and Illinois, respectively. Clients would hire the companies to conduct market research surveys. As part of their business model, Op4G and Slice maintai

More...   $ (09-01-2026 - NH)

State of Oklahoma v. George Henry Miller

Pawhusa, Oklahoma civil defense lawyer Steve Venturi represented the Defendant charged with: 1. CARRYING A FIREARM WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE 2. CARRYING WEAPON TO PUBLIC ASSEMBLY 3. PUBLIC INTOXICATION Reported by: More...   $ (04-26-2026 - OK)

United States of America v. Holsey Ellinburg, Jr.

Kansas City, Missouri, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with bank robbery. A jury convicted him in August 1996. He was sentenced to imprisonment and ordered to pay $7,567.25 in restitution in November 1996. After his release in 2022, he sued to block the continued enforcement of his restitution order. He argued that the Mandatory Victim Restitution Act (“MVRA”)

More...   $ (08-21-2026 - MO)

United States of America v. Harrison Dudley, Jr.

Minneapolis, Minnesota criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with felony child neglect and felony child endangerment in violation of the Major Crimes Act. 18 USC 1153(b) Felony child neglect under the Major Crimes Act is “defined and punished in accordance with the laws of the State in which such offense was committed.” 18 U.S.C. § 1153(b). Minnesota defines “perso

More...   $ (08-21-2026 - MN)

United States of America v. Danny T. Roney, k/a Khalid Abdul Al-Mu’Min, a/k/a Danny Roney

Columbia, South Carolina, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with mailing threatening communications via the United States Postal Service in violation of 18 U.S.C. 870(c). Reported by: Kent Morlan Danny Roney was committed to a federal mental-health facility afte

More...   $ (08-17-2026 - SC)

United States of America, ex rel. John F. Kennedy Center v. Chuck Redd

Washington, DC, sued the Defendant Chuck Redd on a breach of contract theory. A D.C. judge ordered the John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts to pay jazz musician Chuck Redd $252,479.70 in legal fees and costs after dismissing a breach-of-contract lawsuit the venue filed against him. Background of the DisputeThe Cancellation: Jazz drummer and vibraphonist Chuck Redd canceled his sche

More...   $ (08-11-2026 - DC)

Pravin G. Sampat v. Kansas Department of Children and Families

Topeka, Kansas, personal lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an employment discrimination theory. Reported by Kent Morlan Pravin G. Sampat sued the Department and Stone, as an individual, under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, as well as four federal statute

More...   $ (08-04-2026 - KS)

United States of America v. John Doe

Denver, Colorado: John Doe appealed the denial of his motion to dismiss an information charging him with juvenile delinquency for violating 18 U.S.C. § 922(x)(2), which prohibits juvenile possession of a handgun. Doe argues that § 922(x)(2) exceeds Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause. We hold that Congress had a rational basis to conclude that regulating juvenile handgun possession is a

More...   $ (08-03-2026 - CO)

State of Washington v. Shawn Rutherford Kueck

Spokane, Washington, criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with animal cruelty. Digested by Kent Morlan T.K. and Shawn Kueck were married and lived on a rural farm in Rice, Washington. In September 2023, the parties separated after a fight and T.K. left the home with

More...   $ (07-31-2026 - WA)

State of Oklahoma v. Galen Rodney Wooten

Muskogee, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Bringing Alcoholic Beverages Into a Penal Institution, After Former Conviction of a Felony. Digested by: Kent Morlan Defendant was an inmate at the Jess Dunn Correctional Center at Taft, Oklahoma. Defen

More...   $ (06-19-1985 - OK)

United States of America v. Michael Stamp and Marcus Plank

San Francisco, California, criminal defense lawyers represent the Defendants charged with securities fraud. Digested by: Kent Morlan Michael Stamp and Marcus Plank accused of exploitation of their employer’s confidential information allowed them to make more than $300,000 in illegal

More...   $ (07-26-2026 - CA)

State of Vermont v. Mark Sterling

Burlington, Vermont, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with stalking. Reported by Kent Morlan Mark Sterling was charged with one count of aggravated stalking while possessing a deadly weapon under 13 V.S.A. § 1063(5). Additionally, he was charged with violation

More...   $ (07-15-2026 - VT)

United States of America v. Sherif Elmasri

Newark, New Jersey, criminal defense lawyer Ryan Magee represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit health care fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1349 and violation of the anti-kickback statute 18 U.S.C. 371. Reported by: More...   $ (07-10-2026 - NJ)

United States of America v. Erick Marquez Cruz

Newark, New Jersey, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of a machine gun by a person not legally in the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. 922(o)(l). MCDs, which themselves are classified as machineguns by statute, are capable of converting semi-automatic firearms into fully automatic weapons that release multiple rounds of ammunition with the single p

More...   $ (07-02-2026 - NJ)

State of Arizona v. Marty Joseph Morales, Jr.

Safford, Arizona, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charge with two counts of aggravated assault on a first responder. Reported by Kent Morlan Morales argues the trial court erred when it denied a motion to dismiss that argued he had been charged under the wrong versio

More...   $ (06-29-2026 - AZ)

State of Oklahoma v. Meko Atkins

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: ASSAULT WITH A DANGEROUS WEAPON, in violation of 21 O.S. 645 United States Department of Justice: The Assimilative Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. § 13, makes state law applicable to conduct occurring on lands reserved or acquired by the Federal government as provided in 18 U.S.C. § 7(3), when the act or omission is n

More...   $ (06-24-2026 - OK)

United States of America v. Thomas K. Weir

Cookesville, Tennessee, criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to distribute and dispense controlled substances. Reported by Kent Morlan Thomas K. Weir, 65, of Celina, Tennessee, the majority owner of Oakley Pharmacy, doing business as Dale Hollow Ph

More...   $ (06-25-2026 - TN)

State of Oklahoma v. Thry Everts Root

Cherokee, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with making a bomb threat and violation of Oklahoma statute via computer. Violation of 21 O.S. 1958.

More...   $ (04-23-2025 - OK)

Ex partie Pruitt

1. Indictment and Information—Right of Accused to Waive Preliminary Examination. The constitutional provision, art. 2, § 1,, Okla. Const., that no person shall be prosecuted for a felony by information without having had a preliminary examination is in the nature of a personal privilege for the benefit of the accused which may be waived by him. 2. Same—Proper Manner of Challenging Jurisdic

More...   $ (06-08-1948 - OK)

State of Oklahoma v. C.D.O.

Stillwater, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with domestic assault and batter by strangulation in violation of 21 O.S. 644, which provides: A. Assault shall be punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding ninety (90) days, or by a fine not more than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00), or by both such fine and imprisonment. B. Assault and battery shal

More...   $ (05-30-2025 - OK)

State of Oklahoma v. Jennifer Shane Gilmore

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with acquiring proceeds from drug activity in violation of 63 O.S. 2-503.1, which provides: A. It is unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally to receive or acquire proceeds and to conceal such proceeds, or engage in transactions involving proceeds, known to be derived from any violation of the Uniform Controlled

More...   $ (05-27-2026 - OK)

State of Oklahoma v. Jacob Chairez

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of a firearm while in the commission of a felony, possession of a controlled substance, and acquiring proceeds from drug activity. 21 O.S. 1287 provides: A. Any person who, while committing or attempting to commit a felony, possesses a pistol, shotgun or rifle or any other offensive weapon in such commi

More...   $ (05-26-2026 - OK)

State of Oklahoma v. Torrez Cesar

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with 1, First Degree Manslaughter in the commission of a misdemeanor, to wit, Driving while Privilege Suspended, and Count 2, Leaving the Scene of an Accident Resulting in Death, both after former conviction of two or more felonies. By Kent Morlan ¶9 Driving is a privilege, not a right. “The Oklahoma stat

More...   $ (07-19-2010 - OK)

United States of America v. Bobby Brandon Galvan aka “Puravidarecia”

Del Rio, Texas, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with firearm trafficking. Bobby Brandon Galvan aka “Puravidarecia,” 30, was affiliated with the La Nueva Familia Michoacana (LNFM) cartel and straw purchased numerous weapons, to include an AK-47 rifle that was recovered after it was used in a shootout between cartel members and Mexican law enforcement. On Feb. 20, 20

More...   $ (05-05-2026 - TX)

State of North Carolina v. Dylan Warbritton

Jacksonville, North Carolina, criminal defense lawyer represents the defendant charged with communicating threats and cyberstalking. Dylan Warbritton, age 23, accused of sending threatening text messages to the victim, including messages that threatened physical harm. * * * North Carolina, stalking is defined as willfully following, harassing, or intimidating another person on more than

More...   $ (04-29-2026 - NC)

Next Page