| Jesse Dean Redfearn v. William Chris Rankins |
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with first-degree rape and kidnapping. A jury convicted Mr. Redfearn of first-degree rap $0 (01-06-2023 - OK) |
| State of Oklahoma v. Dalton Michael Dorsey |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal law lawyer represented Defendant, charged with: |
| Terry Hobbs v. "Natalie PASDAR, individually, and Natalie Pasdar, Emily Robison, and Martha Seidel d/b/a Dixie Chicks |
|
|
| Antonio G. Ramirez v. Lizzie Tegels |
|
|
| Roynes Joseph "Eric" Dural, II v. State of Hawaii |
|
Petitioner-Appellant Roynes Dural, aka, Roynes J. Dural, aka Roynes Joseph Dural, aka Roynes Joseph Eric Dural II, aka Eric Dural (Dural) appeals from the April 24, 2007 Order Denying Petition to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Judgment or to Release Petitioner Roynes Joseph "Eric" Dural II from Custody (Order Denying Rule 40 Petition) in the Circuit Court of the First Circuit (Circuit Court).1 |
| Joshua Lee Purdom v. State of Oklahoma |
|
Holdenville, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 652; Count 2: Kidnapping, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2012, § 741; Count 5: Sodomy By Force or Fear, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2017, § 888; Count 6: Rape in the First Degree, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2017, § 1114; and Count 7: Feloniously Pointing a Firearm, in violation of $0 (12-22-2022 - OK) |
| Poeople of the State of New York v. Vincent H. Jenkins |
|
Although defendant was the subject of suggestive pretrial identification procedures, the court properly permitted the complainant to identify the defendant at trial as there was an independent basis for the identification. The complainant had ample time to view the defendant (see, People v. Washington, 111 A.D.2d 418, 489 N.Y.S.2d 380, lv denied 66 N.Y.2d 768, 497 N.Y.S.2d 1043, 488 N.E.2d 129; Pe $0 (07-10-1987 - NY) |
| State of New York v. Warith Habib Abdal, a/k/a Vincent H. Jenkins |
|
Buffalo, New York criminal law lawyers represented Defendant charged with first-degree rape, sodomy and second-degree robbery. |
| Jepheth Eglin Barnes v. Spartnburg County Sheriff's Office, et al. |
|
Spartanburg, South Carolina personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983 claiming her was wrongfully convicted of rape and incarcerated to 9 years. |
| The State of South Carolina v. Jepheth Elgin Barnes |
|
Spartanburg, South Carolina criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with sexual abuse of a child. |
| State of Oregon v. Pavlinac |
|
Defendant appeals her convictions of manslaughter in the first degree, ORS 163.118; rape in the first degree, ORS 163.375; sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS 163.427; and felony murder, ORS 163.115. She makes multiple assignments of error. All assignments except the one regarding the trial court's sentence for felony murder are not preserved or do not require discussion. |
| State of Oregon v. Laverne Pavlinac and John Sosnovske |
|
Portland, Oregon criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with manslaughter in the first degree, ORS 163.118; rape in the first degree, ORS 163.375; sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS 163.427; and felony murder, ORS 163.115. |
| The People of the State of California v. Harvey Weinstein |
|
Los Angeles, California criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with one count of rape and two counts of sexual assault. Harvey Weinstein was charged with raping and tw $0 (12-19-2022 - CA) |
| United States of America v. Shaun Marvin |
|
Washington, DC: Criminal law lawyer represented Defendant charged with distributing child porn. Shaun Marvin, age 43, from Colorado, joined a chat group dedicated to trading ch $0 (12-13-2022 - DC) |
| State of Oklahoma v. Meradro Garza, Jr. |
|
|
| Merardo Garza v. State of Kansas |
|
|
| State of Kansas v. Merardo Garza, Jr. |
|
1.A district court is justified in denying a defendant's request for new counsel if there is a reasonable basis for believing the attorney-client relationship has not deteriorated to a point that appointed counsel could not give effective aid in the presentation of the client's defense. |
| State of Kansas V. Merardo Garza, Jr. |
|
Wichita, Kansas criminal Defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with sex abuse. |
| Christopher Conley Tapp v. City of Idaho Falls, et al. |
|
Pocatello, Idaho civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983. |
| Christopher Conley Tapp v. State of Idaho |
|
|
| Christopher Conley Tapp v. State of Idaho |
|
In his second appeal in this post-conviction case, Christopher Conley Tapp challenges the district court's summary dismissal of his claim that his defense counsel provided ineffective assistance by failing to present evidence of his diminished mental capacity in support of his trial motion to suppress his confession as involuntary. Tapp contends that because this Court, in his prior post-convictio $0 (11-21-2013 - ID) |
| Christopher Conley Tapp v. State of Idaho |
|
Early in the morning of June 13, 1996, Angie Dodge was raped and stabbed to death in her apartment in Idaho Falls. On January 7, 1997, twenty-year-old Christopher Tapp voluntarily submitted to police questioning about this crime at the Law Enforcement Building (LEB) in Idaho Falls. Tapp again voluntarily went to the LEB for questioning on January 10. After this interview, Tapp's parents retained p $0 (03-31-2010 - ID) |
| State of Idaho v. Christopher C. Tapp |
|
|
| State of Idaho v. Christopher Tapp |
|
Idaho Falls, Idaho criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with first-degree murder, rape, and use of a deadly weapon in the commission of a felony. |
| Myrickki McClendon v. State of Arkansas |
|
Myrickki McClendonwas tried by a jury and found guilty of the offense of rape involving a child less than fourteen years of age. His victim, S.S., was eight at the time of the rape and ten at the time of trial. McClendon was sentenced to twenty-five years in the Arkansas Department of Correction, with 540 days' jail credit. The trial court then immediately addressed the petition for revocation of $0 (09-19-2012 - AR) |
|
Next Page |