Portland, Oregon criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with trespassing. Ernest Clarke Zacher was charged with trespassing on the Portland Airport. Body camera video in the case showed a Port of Portland police officer telling Zacher that “we run the show” and an intoxicated Zacher divulging that he worked as a defense attorney and knew the police lacked probable caus

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: ENDANGERING OTHERS WHILE ELUDING A POLICE OFFICER, in violation of 21 O.S. 540.A, which provides: A. Any operator of a motor vehicle who has received a visual and audible signal, a flashing red light, flashing red and blue lights, flashing blue and white lights, or any other combination of flashing red, blue, a

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: ENDANGERING OTHERS WHILE ELUDING POLICE OFFICER, in violation of 21 O.S. 540, which provides: A. Any operator of a motor vehicle who has received a visual and audible signal, a flashing red light, flashing red and blue lights, flashing blue and white lights, or any other combination of flashing red, blue, and w

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: ABUSE B Y CARETAKER, in violation of 21 O.S. 843.1,, amended to aggravated assault and battery in violation of 21 O.S. 646, which provides: A. An assault and battery becomes aggravated when committed under any of the following circumstances: 1. When great bodily injury is inflicted upon the person assaulted;

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: DOMESTIC ASSAULT OR ASSAULT AND BATTERY WITH A DANGEROUS WEAPON, in violation of 21 O.S. 644.D.1 D. Any person who, with intent to do bodily harm and without justifiable or excusable cause, commits any assault and battery upon an intimate partner or a family or household member as defined by Section 60.1 of Titl

New York City, New York, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with selling, distributing controlled substances in violation of 21 U.S. 811. Reported by: Kent Morlan Perry Freeman distributed fentanyl that resulted in the death of a 37-yearold man Westchester County

South Bend, Indiana, immigration lawyer represented the Defendant seeking a writ of habeas corpus. 8 USC1105(a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Detention Reported by: Kent Morlan 12/09/2025 1 PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS ( Filing fee $ 5 receipt number AINNDC-6107433.), fi

¶1 Petitioner, Granville Lee Humphrey, was charged by Information with Possession of Controlled Dangerous Substance, Case No. CRF-79-2159, and Carrying a Firearm, After Former Conviction of a Felony, Case No. CRF-79-2273. He posted a bond in the sum of $3,000.00 (Three Thousand Dollars) and $5,000.00 (Five Thousand Dollars) respectively. Preliminary hearing in each case was set for July 10, 1979,

¶1 On August 14, 1998, Petitioner filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus in this Court after being denied bond pending trial in the District Court of Oklahoma County. In an order filed August 14, 1998, the Honorable Noma D. Gurich, District Judge, denied Petitioner’s application for a writ of habeas corpus. Judge Gurich denied bond finding that Petitioner is a flight risk and that he poses

Sapulpa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with 59 counts of cruelty to animals. Digested by: Kent Morlan CM:JS:LISA FOSTER CSR: 03/16/26-DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPRESS, DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO RETURN ANIMALS, STATE PETITION FOR FORFETURE-DEFENDANT PRESEN

Kansas City, Kansas, personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a civil rights claim. Digested by: Kent Morlan Bobbie Jo Horocofsky alleged that she was raped by a law-school classmate. But officers of the City of Lawrence Police Department (LPD) ended up investigating her fo

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with larceny of controlled drugs - Oxycodone, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-403.A, which provides: A. Except as authorized by the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, it shall be unlawful for any person: 1. To distribute, dispense, transport with intent to distribute or dispense, possess with intent to manufacture

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with assault and battery with a dangerous weapon in violation of 21 O.S. 645. Reported by: Kent Morlan 21 O.A. 645 provides: Every person who, with intent to do bodily harm and without justifiable or excusabl

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with false representation in obtaining food stamps over $500 in violation of 56 O.S. 243.B.1, which provides: B. 1. Any person, firm or corporation who violates any of the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a: a. misdemeanor, if the aggregate amount of food stamps or coupons, or the aggregate value of any b

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer Robbi Barker represented the Defendant charged with assault and battery upon a police officer in violation of 21 O.S. 649.B, and assault and battery in violation of 21 O.S. 644.B. Title 21 O.S. 649: B. Every person who, without justifiable or excusable cause knowingly comm

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with stalking in violation of 21 O.S. 1173, which provides: A. Any person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows or harasses another person in a manner that: 1. Would cause a reasonable person or a member of the immediate family of that person as defined in subsection F of this section to feel frightened,

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with receiving and possession stolen property in violation of 21 O.S. 1713 (A), which provides: A. Every person who buys or receives, in any manner, upon any consideration, personal property of a value of One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) or more that has been stolen, embezzled, obtained by false pretense or robbery, know

Burlington, Vermont, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with stalking. Reported by Kent Morlan Mark Sterling was charged with one count of aggravated stalking while possessing a deadly weapon under 13 V.S.A. § 1063(5). Additionally, he was charged with violation

Salt Lake City, Utah, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. 2113(a). Reported by Kent Morlan Jawuan Donte Thomas attempted to rob a bank ATM in Riverton, Utah. Thomas admitted that prior to the attempted robbery, he and tw

St. Helen, Oregon, family law lawyers represented the parties in a protective order case. Reported by Kent Morlan H.F. made application for a stalking protective order against Keith Woods pursuant to ORS 30.866(1). The case involves an appeal against a general judgment issuing a St

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with felony pointing a firearm in violation of 21 O.S. 1289.16, which provides: A. It shall be lawful to point a firearm, knife, or any other deadly weapon at another person or persons by: 1. A person who can legally own or possess a weapon pursuant to the provisions of Section 1272 of this title: a. during an act

Tulsa County, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendants charged with cruelty to animals in violation of 21 O.S. 1685, which provides: Any person who shall willfully or maliciously torture, destroy or kill, or cruelly beat or injure, maim or mutilate any animal in subjugation or captivity, whether wild or tame, and whether belonging to the person or to another, or deprive any

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with embezzlement by an employee in violation of 21 O.S. 1451, which provides: A. Embezzlement is the fraudulent appropriation of property of any person or legal entity, legally obtained, to any use or purpose not intended or authorized by its owner, or the secretion of the property with the fraudulent intent to appropri

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant Keonte Dejuan Code charged with violation of the Computer Crimes Act, 21 O.S. 1953.A, which provides: A. It shall be unlawful to: 1. Willfully, and without authorization, gain or attempt to gain access to and damage, modify, alter, delete, destroy, copy, make use of, use malicious computer programs on, disclose or take possession