Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: OPJ, CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT A FELONY, in violation of 21 O.S. 421 C Count # 2. Count as Filed: RCSP, POSSESSING/RECEIVING/CONCEALING STOLEN PROPERTY, in violation of 21 O.S. 1713(A) Count # 3. Count as Filed: LA4, POSSESSION OF STOLEN VEHICLE, in violation of 47 O.S. 4-103

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: CHN, CHILD NEGLECT, in violation of 21 O.S. 843.5 (C) Date of Offense: 08/01/2023 Party Name Disposition Information FISHER, MICHAEL LEROY Disposed: CONVICTION, 04/21/2025. Nolo Contendere Plea Count as Disposed: CHILD NEGLECT(CHN) Violation of 21 O.S. 843.5 (C) FISHER, ELIZ

¶1 Petitioner, Granville Lee Humphrey, was charged by Information with Possession of Controlled Dangerous Substance, Case No. CRF-79-2159, and Carrying a Firearm, After Former Conviction of a Felony, Case No. CRF-79-2273. He posted a bond in the sum of $3,000.00 (Three Thousand Dollars) and $5,000.00 (Five Thousand Dollars) respectively. Preliminary hearing in each case was set for July 10, 1979,

Tahlequah, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with kidnappin, first degree burglary, possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, and malicious injury to property. Digested by Kent Morlan

Norman, Oklahoma, personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a premises liability negligence theory claiming to have been injured and/or damaged as a direct result of a dangerous condition on the Defendant's property. Digested by Kent Morlan

Norman, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs on a negligent damage to property theory. Digested by Kent Morlan The Plaintiffs claimed that construction on a swimming pool and the Ward property damaged their property.

Las Vegas, Nevada, criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1343 and engaging in transactions in unlawful proceeds in violation of 18 U.S.C. 195l7. Digested by Kent Morlan From January 1, 2018, to about February 28, 2025, Cyn

Pawhuska, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with malicious injury or destruction of property (amended to from malicious injury to property over $1,000).

Pawhuska, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with driving a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol aggravated and operating a vehicle at a speed greater than reasonable and property. Digested by: Kent Morlan

Pawhuska, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with larceny of lost property. Digested by: Kent Morlan

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer Michael French represented the Defendant charged with larceny of lost property in violation of 21 O.S. 1702.2. Digested by: Kent Morlan

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of a firearm AFCF in violation of 21 O.S. 1283 and receiving and/or concealing stolen property in violation of 21 O.S. 1713. Digested by: Kent Morlan

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with uttering a forged instrument in violation of 21 O.S. 1592 and knowingly receiving stolen property in violation of 21 O.S. 1713. Digested by: Kent Morlan

Pawnee, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer Steve Cale represented the Defendant charged with: 1. CONSPIRACY- FELONY 2. BURGLARY IN THE THIRD DEGREE 3. BURGLARY IN THE THIRD DEGREE 4. BURGLARY IN THE THIRD DEGREE 5. KNOWINGLY RECEIVING OR CONCEALING STOLEN PROPERTY- MISD

Pawnee, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: 1. MALICIOUS INJURY TO PROPERTY- OVER $1000.00 2. MALICIOUS INJURY TO PROPERTY - UNDER $1000.00 3. CARRYING A FIREARM WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE- MISD 4. PUBLIC INTOXICATION (MISD

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: EMBEZZLEMENT OF PROPERTY VALUE FROM $2,500 TO $15,000, in violation of 21 O.S. 1451.A Digested by: Kent Morlan

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with larceny of an automobile in violation of 21 O.S. 1720, which provides: Any person in this state who shall steal an aircraft, automobile or other automotive driven vehicle, construction equipment or farm equipment shall be guilty of a Class D1 felony offense and, upon conviction, shall be punished by imprisonment as

Frankfort, Kentucky, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession with intent to distribute a scheduled controlled drug in violation of 21 U.S.C. 841(a) and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1). Digested by: Kent Morlan<

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with larceny of controlled drugs - Oxycodone, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-403.A, which provides: A. Except as authorized by the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substances Act, it shall be unlawful for any person: 1. To distribute, dispense, transport with intent to distribute or dispense, possess with intent to manufacture

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with receiving, possessing, or concealing stolen property in violation of 21 O.S. 1713 and obstructing an officer in violation of 21 O.S. 540. Digested by Kent Morlan

Newkirk, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of child pornography in violation of 21 O.S. 1040.12a. Digested by Kent Morlan On September 25, 2023, Blackwell Police Officers executed a search warrant on Russell's residence searching for ev

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, criminal defense lawyers represent the Defendants charged with 86 counts of forgery, 35 counts of theft, 8 counts of criminal attempt and criminal conspiracy. Petruskie’s charges include 10 counts of theft and criminal conspiracy. Reported by: Kent Morlan Wi

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with false representation in obtaining food stamps over $500 in violation of 56 O.S. 243.B.1, which provides: B. 1. Any person, firm or corporation who violates any of the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a: a. misdemeanor, if the aggregate amount of food stamps or coupons, or the aggregate value of any b

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with malicious injury to property $1,000 or more in violation of 21 O.S. 1760.A.2, which provides: A. Every person who maliciously injures, defaces or destroys any real or personal property not his or her own, in cases other than such as are specified in Section 1761 et seq. of this title, is guilty of: 1. A misdemean

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with stalking in violation of 21 O.S. 1173, which provides: A. Any person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows or harasses another person in a manner that: 1. Would cause a reasonable person or a member of the immediate family of that person as defined in subsection F of this section to feel frightened,