Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with cyberstalking, interstate stalking, and interstate threats. From May through November 2025, Dadig harassed, stalked, threatened, and intimidated 11 female victims through posts on social media, his podcast, text messages, phone calls, and in person. Dadig’s harassment of his victims included showing up t

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with child abuse by injury, in violation of 21 O.S. 843.5. Appellant contends that the trial court abused its discretion by allowing evidence of prior bad acts to be admitted at trial. Appellant's claim primarily centers on the introduction of evidence relating to a violent domestic incident that occurred between Appell

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with unlawful possession of controlled substance, in violaiion of 63 O.S. 2-402B, and unlawful possession of drug paraphernalia, in violation 63 O.S. 2-405. 63 O.S. 2-402 provides: B. 1. Any person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by confinement for not more than one (1) year and by a fin

Newark, New Jersey, criminal Defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to violate the federal anti-kickback statute, 18 U.S.C. 371. From May 2014 through April 2017, Le Thu, age 71, of Boston, Massachusetts, participated in a conspiracy in which she received kickbacks from a telemedicine company in exchange for approving hundreds of prescriptions for durable medical equi

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with driving under the influence of alcohol -2nd offense, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902.C.PM1, B4, which provides: C. 1. Any person who is convicted of a violation of the provisions of this section shall be guilty of a misdemeanor for the first offense and shall: a. participate in an assessment and evaluation pursuan

Montgomery, Alabama civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a declaratory judgment theory challenging the Constitutionality Alabama Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Act (“Act”) in 2011, ALA. CODE § 15- 20A-11. Under it, no sex offender may, among other things, “reside or conduct an overnight visit with a minor,” even if they are the minor’s pare

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with child endangerment in violation of 21 O.S..852.2, which provides: A. It is unlawful and punishable as provided for in this section for any person to drive, operate, or be in actual physical control of a motor vehicle within this state, whether upon public roads, highways, streets, turnpikes, other public places or u

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a bad faith breach of contract theory. Liberty Mutual failed to answer or object to requests for admission. allowing Liberty to withdraw the admissions would subserve2 the presentation of the merits. Requests for admission are typically used to identify issues that will not be disputed at tri

Pawhuska, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with embezzlement in violation of 21 O.S. 1451, which provides: A. Embezzlement is the fraudulent appropriation of property of any person or legal entity, legally obtained, to any use or purpose not intended or authorized by its owner, or the secretion of the property with the fraudulent intent to appropriate it to suc

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with first degree rape in violation of 21 O.S. 1114. Reported by: Kent Morlan Appellant contends that the fact the victim was unconscious at the time of the attack due to intoxication does not satisfy the element

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with Count 1, trafficking in illegal drugs, after former conviction of two (2) or more felonies, in violation of 63 O.S.Supp.2004, § 2-415; Count 2, possession of marijuana, second offense, after former conviction of one (1) or more felonies, in violation of 63 O.S.Supp.2004, § 2-402; and Count 3, failure to obtain a dru

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the parties in a dog bite case. Reported by: Kent Morlan The Plaintiff sued the Defendant claiming to have been injured and/or damaged as a result of being attacked and bitten by Defendant's dog without provocation. Defend

Claremore, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with malicious injury to property in violation of 21 O.S. 1760, which provides: A. Every person who maliciously injures, defaces or destroys any real or personal property not his or her own, in cases other than such as are specified in Section 1761 et seq. of this title, is guilty of: 1. A misdemeanor, if the damag

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: PHYSICAL CONTROL OF VEHICLE WHILE INTOXICATED - SECOND OFFENSE, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902.C2 UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF CONTROLLED DRUG, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-402(A)(1) RESISTING AN OFFICER, in violation of 21 O.S. 268 47 O.S. 11-902.C.2 provides: 2. Any person who, having been convicted of or havin

Sapulpa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer Ben Waters represents the Defendant charged with child abuse. Reported by Kent Morlan 21 O.S. § 843.5 (OSCN 2026), Abuse of Elderly or Disabled Persons or Children A. Any person who shall willfully or maliciously engage in child abuse, as

Los Angeles, California, environmental lawyers represented the Plaintiff who used the Defendant claiming it violating the Clean Water Act. Plaintiffs sued defendant Corona Clay Co. for violating certain stormwater-permit requirements related to its clay-recycling activities conducted near Temescal Creek. Corona defended by arguing that it had not discharged any pollutants into the creek. The ca

Olathe, Kansas, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with second-degree murder and driving on a suspended license. Reported by Kent Morlan On a Friday evening in August 2016, Landunn D. Richardson was driving a 1994 GMC Sierra truck southbound on I-635 when he su

Stilwell, Oklahoma, civil litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff claiming that Service Oklahoma does not have the authority to revoke Plaintiff's driving privileges because the requirement to install a mandatory ignition interlock program called an IDAP is so punitive in nature that it violates the Double Jeopardy progection of both the United States and Oklahoma Constitutions. 47 O.S. §

Muskogee, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Possession of a Controlled Dangerous Substance (Marijuana) in a Penal Institution. Digested by: Kent Morlan Appellant was an inmate at Jess Dunn Correctional Center when he was discovered to be in posse

Alexandria, Virginia immigration lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued in federal district court asserting two challenges: (1) an Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”) challenge to USCIS’ interpretation of the exclusion clause such that it excludes any individual who was granted SIJ status from ever conferring immigration benefits on their natural or adoptive parents; and (2) a consti

Metairie, Louisiana, family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce actions. Digested by: Kent Morlan In this case arising from parents disputing custody of a minor child, plaintiff Lennie Dazat, mother of minor child D.N., appeals a January 5, 2026 judgment of the trial court

Idabel, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with making a Lewd or Indecent Proposal to Child Under 16, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2022, §1123(A)(1). Digested by Kent Morlan The ultimate question of sufficiency of the evidence should be resolved with d

Sussex, Virginia, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with attempted second-degree murder, maliciously discharging a firearm within an occupied building, felony reckless handling of a firearm resulting in serious bodily injury, use of a firearm in the commission of a felony, and unlawful shooting in the commission of a felony. The parties entered a plea agreement that capped

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with malicious injury to property $1,000 or more in violation of 21 O.S. 1760.A.2, which provides: A. Every person who maliciously injures, defaces or destroys any real or personal property not his or her own, in cases other than such as are specified in Section 1761 et seq. of this title, is guilty of: 1. A misdemean

St. Helen, Oregon, family law lawyers represented the parties in a protective order case. Reported by Kent Morlan H.F. made application for a stalking protective order against Keith Woods pursuant to ORS 30.866(1). The case involves an appeal against a general judgment issuing a St