New Haven, Connecticut insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of contract theory.

If an insured believes that his insurance company acted in bad faith, he can file a complaint with the Insurance Department. He can also file a civil lawsuit alleging a breach of the implied duty of good faith and fair dealing or tortious bad faith.

If a court

Indianapolis, Indiana criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with 35-42-1-1(1): Murder, 35-42-1-1(1)/F1: Attempted Murder Attempted intentional killing of another., 35-42-3-3(a)/F3: Criminal Confinement while armed with a deadly weapon, 35-42-2-1(c)(1)/MA: Battery Resulting in Bodily Injury.

Sec. 1. A person who:

(1) knowingly or intentionally kills another hum

McAllen, Texas civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a sex discrimination theory.

Section 1981 applies only to intentional racial discrimination, while Title VII applies to intentional discrimination and disparate impact discrimination on race, color, national origin, sex, or religion. Title VII also requires an EEOC charge to be filed before bringing their claims in c

Muskogee, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on defamation theories.

Scott Sapulpa claimed that the he was defamed and damaged as a direct result of being wrongfully mistaken and identified as the announcer who make racist comments during a 2021 broadcast of a girls basketball game.

Sapulpa alleged defamation and the intentional inf

Salt Lake City, Utah personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.

Under Utah's premises liability rules, a property owner can be held responsible for injuries to visitors. It does not matter if those injuries were intentional or unintentional. Property owners are liable if they fail to guard or warn visito

Las Cruces, New Mexico, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a tort to land theory.

"At its core, the tort of trespass to land protects and vindicates a possessor's right to exclusive possession against physical intrusions that are intentional (in the particular sense discussed in § 1.5 below) and unauthorized. Thus, the standard instance of this t

On August 14, 2018, Alberto Alfaro and Enrique Umana Somoza were
outside a home in Wichita trying to jump start Alfaro's truck. Cardell Turner pulled up
beside them in his car, pointed a gun in the direction of Somoza and Alfaro, and pulled
the trigger. The gun did not fire. Turner drove away, and no one was harmed. The State
charged Turner with two counts of attempted first-d

Ottawa, Kansas, criminal defense lawyer presented the Defendant charged with first-degree murder, second-degree murder and felony possession of a firearm.

In 2013, Andrew Stout and two friends, including Steven White, lived at Stout's
house in rural Franklin County. Flack, another friend of Stout's, occasionally spent time
there. Flack brought a shotgun with him everywhere, usua

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with being a Embezzlement and Filing False Tax Returns.

Chicago, Illinois civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory.

The Congress found that—
(1) physical or mental disabilities in no way diminish a person's right to fully participate in all aspects of society, yet many people with physical or mental disabilities have been precluded from doing so becau

Winchester, Tennessee personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on 42:1983 Civil Rights Act violation theory.


Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code is a crucial piece of American civil rights legislation known as the Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights. It grants citizens the right to sue state and local government officials for violati

Albany, New York insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the defendant on bad faith breach of an insurance contract.

This case was file din the NYS Supreme Court - County of Albany, 900400-23, and was removed to federal court by Travelers Commercial Insurance Company.

In New York, while there isn't a separate tort for bad faith like some other states, there are st

Detroit, Michigan insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

This case was filed in the Wayne County Circuit Court, 21-015352-CK, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.


Key elements of a bad faith claim in Michigan:

Breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing: This duty

Grand Rapids, Michigan insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on bad faith breach of insurance contract theories.


Key elements of a bad faith claim in Michigan:

Breach of the duty of good faith and fair dealing: This duty requires the insurance company to handle claims promptly, fairly, and in accordance with the terms of the policy.

Atlanta, Georgia Criminal Defense Lawyer represented the Defendant who extorted Georgia Tech

Wilmington, Delaware personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on Federal Tort Claim Act civil rights violation theories.

The Complaint

Wilmington, Delaware personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

"Delaware personal injury negligence law governs situations where someone gets hurt due to another party's carelessness or failure to act reasonably. Here's a breakdown of key aspects:

Duty of care: Property owners, businesses, and individuals all have a duty of ca

Kalamazoo, Michigan personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on wrongful death auto negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Michigan Auto Negligence Law: Key Points

Michigan auto negligence law focuses on determining who's responsible for damages caused by car accidents. Here's a breakd

Tampa, Florida personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court Hillsborough County, 23-CA-016611, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

Florida Personal Injury Law

What is Personal Injury Law?

Helena, Montana personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a motor vehicle accident caused by a federal government employee.

Here's an overview of the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA):

What it is:

A federal st

Missoula, Montana personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered damages and/or injuries caused by a federal government employee.

the FTCA is a federal law that allows individuals to sue the United States government for certain kinds of negligence committed by its employees act

Seattle, Washington personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on motor vehicle product liability theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Motor vehicle product liability law protects consumers from injuries caused by defective or malfunctioning vehicles and their components. It's a complex area of law with various fact

Seattle, Washington personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act auto negligence theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Federal Tort Claims Act Law:

the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA) is a federal law and applies throughout the United States, including Washington State, it do

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on premises liability negligence theories claiming to have suffered more than $!0,000 in damages and/or injuries.

On or about the 5th day of Mrch 2020, Plaintiff was very seriously injured while a business invitee of Defendants Law Americas Supermerado #3. Plaintiff fell while entering the store.

Scranton, Pennsylvania insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on a breach of insurance contract theory.

his case involves interpretation of an insurance policy providing coverage for Defendant Raul Jauregui ("Jauregui”) regarding another matter pending before the court. On February 13, 2023, plaintiffs initiated this action in the Luzerne County Cou