Central Islip, New York commercial litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a breach of contract theory claiming $200,000 as a direct result of the breach.

"In New York, a breach of contract occurs when one party to a contract fails to fulfill their obligations under the contract. There are four elements that must be established in order to prove a breach of

Minneapolis, Minnesota consumer law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a breach of fiduciary duty theory.

"A breach of fiduciary duty is a legal concept that occurs when someone who has a duty to act in the best interests of another person fails to do so. This can happen in a variety of relationships, such as between a trustee and a beneficiary, a director and a co

Santa Ana, California employment law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant seeking a writ of mandate, declaratory relief and injunctive relief.

The Center for Scientific Integrity (CSI) is an organization that reports on academic retractions and accountability.CSI wrote an article about Constance Iloh, a professor at the University of California, Irvine (UCI), after several acad

Omaha, Nebraska employment law lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued her former employer challenging a restrictive covenant in an employment contract.


Jacqueline Damon was an at-will employee of Universal Group, Ltd. Damon who was then a resident of Omaha, Nebraska, started working for Universal in 2014. That same year, Universal promoted Damon to the position of Account Manager, a

Portland, Maine criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with cyberstalking.

Jonathan Trayes, age 34, was involved in a brief relationship with the victim which ended when Trayes was arrested for violating conditions of release after the victim accused him of physical assault. Trayes eventually pleaded guilty in state court to domestic assault with priors, violating condition

Muskogee, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with stalking, attempted first degree burglary in Indian Country, attempted sexual abuse, first degree burglary and coercion and enticement.


18 U.S.C. 1151 provides:

Except as otherwise provided in sections 1154 and 1156 of this title, the term "Indian country”, as used in this chapter, means (a)

East St. Louis, Illinois civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on prisoner civil rights violation theories.


Plaintiff Raymond Stinde, an inmate of the Illinois Department of Corrections currently incarcerated at Menard Correctional Center ("Menard"), brings this action for alleged deprivations of his constitutional rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for v

Sioux Falls, South Dakota civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants taking of property without just compensation.


Plaintiffs Vitaliy and Nataliya Strizheus (collectively "Plaintiffs”) seek a preliminary injunction to prevent Defendant the City of Sioux Falls ("the City”) from enforcing a final state court judgment permitting the razing of Plaintiffs'

Charleston, West Virginia civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant seeking an injunction

The question presented by this case is whether the state of West Virginia may validly require incarcerated individuals, as a condition of eligibility for parole, to complete a substance abuse treatment program alleged to involve pervasive religious elements. Despite its lo

Before this Court are two core questions: (1) can the State of Oregon limit the number of bullets to ten, that a law-abiding citizen can fire without reloading; and (2) can the State of Oregon require firearm purchasers to obtain a permit, which imposes various requirements, including a completed background check, safety training, and consideration of mental health status, before purchasing a fire

Albuquerque, New Mexico pro se Plaintiff sued Defendant without a lawyer on a civil rights theory.


This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Donald Thomas Sharp's Criminal Complaint (Doc. 1). Also before the Court are his various motions seeking mandamus relief, to take action against the Public Defender, to amend, to enter evidence, to add defendants, and for an injunction. See D

Louisville, Kentucky pro se Plaintiff sued Defendants on a federal question theory.


Plaintiff filed her Complaint on a Court-approved form. [R. 1]. Plaintiff names as Defendants Attorney Beth Casper, Jefferson District Court Judge Jennifer Leibson, Jefferson District Court Judge Anne Delahanty, Jefferson Circuit Court Judge Susan Schultz Gibson, Meadowood Management and its owner Ter

Houston, Texas civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant alleging violations of the Americans With Disabilities Act.


Plaintiff filed the Complaint on September 19, 2022.[3] He states that he is disabled as defined by the ADA and that he uses a wheelchair for mobility.[4] Defendant is an owner of property located at 10001 Westheimer, Houston, TX 77042 ("the Property

Cincinnati, Ohio employment law lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) violation theory.



In September 2020, the named plaintiffs-a number of former "home-health aides"- brought this suit against A&L Homecare &Training, LLC and its owners (collectively, "A&L") under the FLSA and Ohio law. The plaintiffs alleged that A&L had paid the

Camden, New Jersey civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on a Second Amendment violation theory claiming that New Jersey's firearm laws are unconstitutional.


"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” U.S. Const. amend. II. For more than 200 years a

Chicago, Illinois civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff, which sued Defendant challenging Defendant's special events ordinance and seeking an injunction.


Aurora Pride's lawsuit concerns both past and ongoing events. In part, the lawsuit concerns the 2022 Aurora Pride Parade. In 2022, the city temporarily revoked Aurora Pride's permit and charged Aurora Pride certain police over

West Palm Beach, Florida consumer law lawyer represent Plaintiff who sued defendant on a Telephone Consumer Protection Act violation theory under 47 U.S.C. 227, which provides, in part:

(b) Restrictions on use of automated telephone equipment
(1) ProhibitionsIt shall be unlawful for any person within the United States, or any person outside the United States if the recipient is withi

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a trademark infringement theory under 15 U.S.C. 1114, which provides:

(1) Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrant—
(a) use in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale

San Antonio, Texas family law lawyers represented Petition and Respondent in a matter involving an application for an order returning a child to Mexico pursuant to the Hague Convention.

This case arises under the Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction (the "Hague Convention” or "Convention”), Oct. 24, 1980, T.I.A.S. No. 11670, S. Treaty Doc.

Springfield, Missouri civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on prisoner civil rights theories.

"Prisoner civil rights law is a body of law that protects the rights of people who are incarcerated. This law is based on the U.S. Constitution and federal and state laws.

The Eighth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution prohibits cruel and unusual punishment. This

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma education law lawyer represented Plaintiffs who challenged school quarantine policy.


¶1 During the summer of 2021, Appellants, Edmond Public School Board Members and Edmond Public School District Superintendent, Angela Grunewald, (collectively "District") anticipated a complete return to in-person instruction for the 2021-2022 school year. Prior to the start

Tulsa, Oklahoma intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff which sued Defendant on a trademark infringement theory.

15 U.S.C. 1114 provides:

(1) Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrant—
(a) use in commerce any reproduction, counterfeit, copy, or colorable imitation of a registered mark in connection with the sale, offering for sale, distrib

Seattle, Washington consumer law lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on Telephone Consumer Protection Act violation theories.

Defendants claimed to have identified "a real question” regarding the viability of plaintiffs' autodialer claims, and plaintiffs have not shown that they will be prejudiced if a stay is ordered. Wood v. McEwen, 644 F.2d 797, 802 (9th Cir. 1981)

St. Louis, Missouri civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant claiming that Plaintiff's First Amendment Constitutional rights were violated by Defendant.

Plaintiffs Raven Wolf C. Felton Jennings II ("Jennings”) and Raymond Douglas ("Douglas”) are street musicians who perform in the University City Loop Special Business District ("the Loop”). On April

¶1 The Petitioners consist of healthcare providers, Tulsa Women's Reproductive Clinic, LLC, Alan Braid, M.D., Comprehensive Health of Planned Parenthood Great Plains, Inc., Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma and an advocacy group, the Oklahoma Call for Reproductive Justice. The Respondents consist of the Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma, the district attorneys of Oklahoma