| United States of America v. Joses Ric-E Beck |
|
Muskogee, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with failure to register as a sex offender. |
| United States of America v. Ramey Joe-Don Dill |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with failure to register as a sex offender. $0 (11-26-2025 - OK) |
| State of Oklahoma v. Jose Antonio Gomez-Perez |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: |
| State of Oklahoma v. Brian Lee Thompson |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with failure to register as a sex offender. |
| Margaret Starks v. St. Louis County, et al. |
|
St. Louis, Missouri, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a deliberate indifference constitutional violation theory. |
| United States of America v. Adrien Cole |
|
Des Moines, Iowa, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with sex trafficking. |
| Marcus L. Willis v. Diaz De Leon, Jeff Williams, Chief, City of Bedford |
|
Dallas, Texas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. 1983. |
| Juliana Swink v. Souothern Health Partners, Inc., et al. |
|
Greensboro, North Carolina personal injury lawyer represents the Plaintiff on medical malpractice, wrongful death and civil rights claims. |
| David Timpanaro v. Jenkinson's Pavilion, Inc. and Jenkinson's South, Inc. |
|
Morristown, New Jersey, personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a wrongful death negligence theory. |
| Jason R. Nelson v. Navistar, Inc., et al. |
|
Boston, Massachusetts personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on product liability theories. |
| State of Kansas v. Sultan Y. Andemichael |
|
Topeka, Kansas criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with nvoluntary manslaughter; recklessley; Failure to stop accident; result in death; and Interference with law enforcement officer; conceal/alter/destroy evidence in felony case. |
| William Henry Jamerson v. City of Tulsa, et al. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff was charged with first-degree rape in 1991. |
| Commonwealth of Virginia v. Derek McKinley Mabins |
|
Halifax, Virginia, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with grand larceny, in violation of Code § 18.2-95; felony failure to appear, in violation of Code § 19.2-128; petit larceny, in violation of Code § 18.2-96; and intentional destruction of property valued at less than $1,000, in violation of Code § 18.2-137(B)(i). |
| Commonwealth of Virginia v. Catherine Renee Tellez |
|
Williamsburg, Virginia, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with failing to stop after involvement in an accident that resulted in death. |
| Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Tesean Lamont Salter |
|
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with carrying a firearms without a license, driving without a license, and failure to use a safety belt. |
| Diana Newton v. Kohl's, Inc. |
|
Rutland, Vermont, employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff on a civil rights employment discrimination theory. |
| State of Oklahoma v. Rodolfo Olalde Reyna |
|
Sapulpa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: |
| United States of America v. Gregory W. Pheasent |
|
Las Vegas, Nevada criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with failure to use required taillight at night on an ATM on federal land. |
| State of Oklahoma v. E.D.B. |
|
Sapulpa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer is representing the Defendant charged with: |
| State of Oregon v. Benjamin Guthrie Koteen |
|
McMinnville, Oregon, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with one count of driving under the influence of intoxicants, ORS 813.010. |
| Doe v. Doe |
|
Grangeville, Idaho, family law lawyers represented the parties in a parental rights termination case. |
| State of Nevada v. Tiktok, Inc., et al. |
|
Las Vegas, Nevada commercial litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiffs seeking a writ of prohibition or, alternatively, mandamus challenging a district court order denying a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim in a consumer protection action. |
| State of Alaska v. Ross E. Tolle |
|
Kodiak, Alaska, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with one count each of third-degree assault, fourth-degree assault, and failure to appear after he beat and strangled his then-romantic partner and failed to appear for a pretrial hearing. |
| United States of America v. Bryan Ross |
|
Pierre, South Dakota, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with failing to appear in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 3146(a)(l) and 3146(b)(l)(A)(ii). |
| JERRY LEE IRWIN, Appellant v. THE STATE OF OKLAHOMA, Appellee |
|
¶1 Appellant, Jerry Lee Irwin, was convicted by a jury in the District Court of Tulsa County, Case No. CF-2021-3185, of Count 1: Assault and Battery with a Deadly Weapon, in violation of 21 O.S.2011, § 652(C); Count 4: Kidnapping, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2012, § 741; Count 5: Possession of a Firearm After Former Conviction, in violation of 21 O.S.Supp.2019, § 1283(A); and Count 6: Tr $0 (08-22-2024 - OK) |
|
Next Page |