Eminent Domain Law
 
United Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria v. Gavin C. Newsom, as Governor, etc.

This is a case about how California law applies to the
delicate juncture of executive power, federalism, and tribal
sovereignty. Under the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act
(IGRA; 25 U.S.C. § 2701 et seq.), the United States Secretary
of the Interior (Interior Secretary) may permit casino-style
gaming on certain land taken into federal trust for an Indian
tribe, so long

More...   $0 (09-08-2020 - CA)

State of Louisiana v. Jeremy Rachal













More...   $0 (08-24-2020 - LA)

Janice Jarman v. HCR Manorcare, Inc.

Health and Safety Code1 section 1430, subdivision (b)
gives a current or former nursing care patient or resident the
right to bring a private cause of action against a skilled nursing
facility for violating certain regulations. The available remedies
include injunctive relief, costs and attorney fees, and “up to five
hundred dollars ($500)” in statutory damages. The questio

More...   $0 (08-23-2020 - CA)

United States of America v. Jesus Adrian Ledesma Bernal, a/k/a JSS





New Orleans, LA - The United States of America charged Jesus Adrian Ledesma Bernal, a/k/a JSS, age 32, with conspiracy to commit mail fraud.

As detailed in the factual basis and superseding bill of information, the defendants, from at least January 1, 2016, to the present,

More...   $0 (08-05-2020 - LA)

State of Louisiana v. Jeremy Rachal













On May 11, 2015, a fire was reported at the Kingwood Forest
Apartments

More...   $0 (08-01-2020 - LA)

Richard Paul Rutgard v. City of Los Angeles

California’s Eminent Domain Law (Code Civ. Proc.,
§ 1230.010 et seq.)
1 —and, in particular, Code of Civil Procedure
section 1245.245—provides that when “[p]roperty acquired by a
public entity [through eminent domain] . . . is not used for [its
intended] public use . . . within 10 years of adoption of the
resolution of necessity [that authorized its taking],” the

More...   $0 (07-31-2020 - CA)

Thomas Waldock, Trustee of the Trust Court of Appeals No. WD-19-048 Agreement of Thomas A. Waldock, et al. v. Rover Pipeline, LLC, et al.




MoreLawTV
Internet Video Marketing for Legal Professionals
Call 918-582-7744 Today






<

More...   $0 (07-11-2020 - OH)

Jimcy McGirt v. State of Oklahoma







On the far end of the Trail of Tears was a promise. Forced to leave their ancestral lands in Georgia and Alabama, the Creek Nation received assurances that their new lands

More...   $0 (07-09-2020 - OK)

Stanford Vina Ranch Irrigation Company v. State of California

Stanford Vina Ranch Irrigation Company (Stanford Vina) sued the State Water
Resources Control Board (the Board), among other defendants, challenging the Board’s
issuance of certain temporary emergency regulations in 2014 and 2015, during the height
of one of the most severe droughts in California’s history. The challenged regulations
established minimum flow requirements on thr

More...   $0 (07-07-2020 - CA)

ANGEL SANTIAGO-GONZALEZ vs. STATE OF FLORIDA












The Incident and Response
Around 9:40 p.m. on the night of January 9, 2014, corrections officers
responded to a disturbance in the K dormitory at the RMC. Captain William
Ha

More...   $0 (06-29-2020 - FL)

STATE OF NEBRASKA V. SAMUEL A. MORRIS







Attempted first degree sexual assault of
a child







On March 23, 2018, the State filed an information charging Morris with two counts:
count I, first degree sexual a

More...   $0 (06-28-2020 - NE)

Gerald Lynn Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia

Sometimes small gestures can have unexpected consequences. Major initiatives practically guarantee them. In our time, few pieces of federal legislation rank in significance with the Civil Rights Act of 1964. There, in Title VII, Congress outlawed discrimination in the workplace on thebasis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. Today,we must decide whether an employer can fire someones

More...   $0 (06-15-2020 - GA)

STATE OF OHIO - vs - DAVID J. WEAVER a.k.a. DAVID JOHN WEAVER

On June 5, 2019, Weaver was indicted on one count of possession of
cocaine, a fifth-degree felony in violation of R.C. 2925.11(A)(C)(4)(a), and one count of
illegal use or possession of drug paraphernalia, a fourth-degree misdemeanor in
violation of R.C. 2925.14(C)(1)(F)(1). Weaver was also indicted on two other counts,
which were dismissed through an oral motion by the state.

More...   $0 (06-07-2020 - OH)

STATE OF OHIO -vs- ERIC R. RAMEY

MoreLaw Receptionists
VOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services
Call 918-582-6422 Today


On September 28, 2018, Detective Dave Stone of the Coshocton County
Sheriff’s Office was cond

More...   $0 (05-22-2020 - OH)

STATE OF OHIO v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC

MoreLaw Receptionists
VOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services
Call 918-582-6422 Today


} Plaintiff-appellant, the State of Ohio (the “State”) appeals the February
26, 2019 judgme

More...   $0 (05-13-2020 - OH)

Larkin Development North, L.L.C. v. City of Shreveport consolidated with Larkin Development at Railsback, L.L.C. v. City of Shreveport

MoreLaw Receptionists
VOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services
Call 918-582-6422 Today


Since the trial court granted the exceptions at issue, it did not consider
the merits of the ca

More...   $0 (04-26-2020 - LA)

Amgen, Inc. v. Health care Services

Health and Safety Code section 127677, enacted as part of
Senate Bill No. 17 (Stats. 2017, ch. 603, § 4), requires
pharmaceutical manufacturers to provide 60-days’ notice to
public and private registered purchasers, including state entities
and health insurers, before increasing the wholesale acquisition
cost of a drug (we will refer to the notice as a “price increase

More...   $0 (04-11-2020 - CA)

Amgen, Inc. v. Health care Services

Health and Safety Code section 127677, enacted as part of
Senate Bill No. 17 (Stats. 2017, ch. 603, § 4), requires
pharmaceutical manufacturers to provide 60-days’ notice to
public and private registered purchasers, including state entities
and health insurers, before increasing the wholesale acquisition
cost of a drug (we will refer to the notice as a “price increase

More...   $0 (04-11-2020 - CA)

Michael Holland v. State of Mississippi

MoreLaw Receptionists
VOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services
Call 918-582-6422 Today



At 11:00 p.m. on August 15, 2015, D’Alandis Love, Perez Love, and their cousins,
Kelsey

More...   $0 (04-07-2020 - MS)

United States of America v. Vaughn Simon

MoreLaw Receptionists
VOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services
Call 918-582-6422 Today



Philadelphia, PA - The United States of America charged Vaughn Simon with mail fraud, wire fr

More...   $0 (04-03-2020 - PA)

United States of America v. Kirill Victorovich Firsov

MoreLaw Receptionists
VOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services
Call 918-582-6422 Today



San Diego, CA - The United States of America charged Kirill Victorovich Firsov with felony co

More...   $0 (03-29-2020 - ca)

ADAM BROWN v. STATE OF ARKANSAS

MoreLaw Receptionists and Morelaw Suites

VOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services and Morelaw Virtual Offices
Call 918-582-6422 Today

Virtual Offices of Solo Practice Lawyers Starting at $200 a Month
Office With MoreLaw Suites and Let Us Answer Your Phone and Reduce Your Overhead

More...   $0 (03-27-2020 - AR)

STATE OF KANSAS v. ANTHONY RAYMOND BECKER

MoreLaw Receptionists
VOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services
Call 918-582-6422 Today



Anthony Becker, Chelsea Sosa, and Chris Boyd spent an afternoon in April 2015
smoking meth

More...   $0 (03-24-2020 - KS)

STATE OF KANSAS v. ANTHONY RAYMOND BECKER

MoreLaw Receptionists
VOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services
Call 918-582-6422 Today



Anthony Becker, Chelsea Sosa, and Chris Boyd spent an afternoon in April 2015
smoking met

More...   $0 (03-23-2020 - KS)

CONSOLIDATED CUT STONE CO. v. SEIDENBACH

¶0 1. APPEAL AND ERROR - Supreme Court Without Jurisdiction to Determine Questions of Fact and Law New and Different From Those Involved When Case Presented on Appeal.
In an appellate proceeding the Supreme Court does not have original jurisdiction to try and determine questions of fact and law new and different from those involved in the case when it was presented on appeal.
2. MECHANICS

More...   $0 (12-07-1931 - OK)

Next Page