Durango, Colorado family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce case.

Shortly before their 2011 marriage, the parties executed a premarital agreement, in which they agreed that each party would retain their separate property if the marriage was dissolved. The premarital agreement defined separate property to include premarital assets, separately titled property, property acqui

Bristow, Oklahoma family law lawyers represented wife and husband in a divorce.

Denver, Colorado family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce.

In 2023, the district court dissolved the parties' seven-year
marriage. The court directed the parties to exercise equal parenting
time with their three children, and it allocated to wife sole decision-
making responsibility. The court determined that the true value of
the marital estate was $2,

Hernando, Mississippi, criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with two counts of gratification of lust for fondling his minor daughter.

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce.

Years after his divorce was final, a firefighter retired and elected to participate in the Oklahoma Firefighters Pension and Retirement Plan B program. The firefighter's former spouse sought to enforce the parties' divorce decree, requiring the firefighter to pay her a portion of his Plan B benefits. The dis

West Liberty, Kentucky family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce.

Michael and Allison married in April 2022. In December 2022, the Morgan Family Court entered a decree dissolving the Adkins' marriage but reserving property issues for later determination. A few months later, the family court conducted an evidentiary hearing and then took the matter under advisement. Both part

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce action.

Cory Drew Hubert disputes the amount of attorney fees the trial court awarded him in this divorce proceeding pursuant to four separate statutes authorizing such awards under the circumstances presented. Cora Ann Hubert was ordered to pay him attorney fees, but the trial court reduced the fees after con

Pueblo, Colorado family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce action.

In 2023, husband petitioned the court to dissolve the parties'
twelve-year marriage, and wife responded by filing a waiver and
acceptance of service. After the parties appeared at the initial
status conference, nothing happened in the case for the next six
weeks. The court issued a delay

Pueblo, Colorado family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce.

The parties were married for twenty-two years. In 2023, the
district court dissolved the marriage and entered permanent orders.

In doing so, the court divided the parties' $620,000 marital
estate by allocating to husband about $340,000 of the marital
equity and wife the remaining $280,000

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce case.

Batterman and Silvia Santo ("Santo") were married on November 29, 2014, and separated three years later. The parties have two children, born in October 2015 and October 2017. In December 2017, Santo filed a complaint for child support. On June 22, 2018, the trial court entered a final child support

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce.

Batterman and Silvia Santo ("Santo") were married in November 2014, separated in November 2017, and divorced in August 2023. The parties had two children during the marriage. In December 2017, Santo filed a complaint for child support against Batterman. On June 22, 2018, the trial court entered a final chi

Miami, Florida family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce.

In this intrafamily dispute, the former husband challenges a nonfinal order granting intervention and requiring him to transfer his interest in the former marital residence to his son after the trial court imposed a constructive trust over the property. On appeal, he contends the trial court misconstrued the terms of

Elizabethtown, North Carolina family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce action.

The parties were married on 12 July 1997. Six days prior to their wedding, on 6 July 1997, Defendant presented Plaintiff with a Premarital Agreement, which she then signed. The parties separated on 19 September 2021.

Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a Complaint in Blad

Santa Cruz, California family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce.

Jorge Chen (Father) appeals the trial court's order granting Sarah Chen's (Mother) request to move with their child to Minnesota. He contends the trial court erred by failing to exclude the custody evaluator's testimony and report because the evaluation was not executed in compliance with required legal standa

New Haven, Connecticut family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce.

The plaintiff and the defendant were married on January 25, 1981. On March 24, 1998, the plaintiff commenced the present action seeking a dissolution of the marriage on the ground that the marriage had broken down irretrievably. On November 6, 1998, the court, Dunnell, J., issued a memorandum of decision rend

Beaver, Oklahoma, family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce with minor children.

Upper Marlboro, Maryland family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce.

Christopher Phillips ("Father") and Pamela Springer ("Mother") are the unmarried parents of C.P., born in October 2007.[1] Under a consent order entered on June 15, 2017, Mother was awarded primary physical and sole legal custody of C.P., with "reasonable rights of access granted to [Father.]" This custodia

Jackson, Mississippi criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant asserting that the verdict is contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence

Little Rock, AR divorce lawyer represented the appellant with appealing from an order finding her in contempt and a subsequent order awarding attorney's fees.

Tulsa, Oklahoma family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce.

1. The phrase 'actual resident' and the word 'resident' as used in Title 12 O.S.1951, § 1272, as amended, contemplate an actual residence with substantially the same attributes as are intended when the word 'domicile' is used.

2. In determining a person's intentions as to his domicile, his acts and conduc

Norman, Oklahoma family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce.

There was a dispute over whether the court had the required jurisdiction to hear the case and render a decree of divorce.

63 And the court in that case cites with approval the case of Hinds v. Hinds, 1 Iowa 36, wherein Mr. Justice Wright says:

"A legal residence, not an actual residence alone, but

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on professional negligence theories.

Plaintiff Maria Del Rosario Chico Vietti brought a lawsuit on behalf of herself and her minor children, A.R.V., P.F.V., and H.S.V., against defendants Welsh & McGough PLLC (W&M), Catherine Welsh, and Jaime Vogt, arising out of their alleged acts and omissions durin

Clearwater, Florida family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce.

Ms. Bonsignori and Dianne Boulay married in 2013. Prior to Ms. Boulay's filing for dissolution of marriage in 2018, the parties owned multiple single-purpose LLCs and corporations through which they controlled different business ventures, including a spa business and the building out of which the spa operated. To

Freehold, New Jersey family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce action.

Following a seven-day Harrington[1] hearing, the Family Part judge entered an order that the parties settled their divorce action. Based on her credibility findings, the judge rejected defendant's claim that he did not agree to settle the matter. The judge determined defendant accepted plaintiff's settlem

Lawrenceburg, Indiana family law lawyers represented the parties in a child support dispute.

Father and his ex-wife, Abby Abbinante (Mother), divorced in 2017. Both proceeding pro se, they agreed to a decree of dissolution that provided for joint custody, equal parenting time, and "no support" for the couple's two sons. App. Vol. II, p. 20. The dissolution court approved the agreement.