Philadelphia, Pennsylvania criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with possession of drugs with intent to distribute, criminal conspiracy, possession of a firearm by a prohibited person, criminal use of communications facility, and simple possession of drugs. Reported by: Ke

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to commit federal program bribery in violation of 18 U.S.c. 371 and making a false claim in violation of 18 U.S.C. 287. Mark 1 Restoration Company (“Mark 1”) and its owner Mark Snedden have agreed to a $7,257,232.12 resolution of civil claims arising from kickbacks that Mark 1 paid to an A

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with stalking in violation of 21 O.S. 1173, which provides: A. Any person who willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly follows or harasses another person in a manner that: 1. Would cause a reasonable person or a member of the immediate family of that person as defined in subsection F of this section to feel frightened,

New York, New York, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with manslaughter. Reported by Kent Morlan Dmitriy Popov, 20, of Sheepshead Bay, Brooklyn, stabbed and killed O’Shae Sibley, 28, at a Midwood gas station after hurling homophobic and anti-Black slurs at him

Burlington, Vermont, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with stalking. Reported by Kent Morlan Mark Sterling was charged with one count of aggravated stalking while possessing a deadly weapon under 13 V.S.A. § 1063(5). Additionally, he was charged with violation

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: ORGANIZED RETAIL CRIME, in violation of 21 O.S. 1731.2

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with embezzlement by an employee in violation of 21 O.S. 1451, which provides: A. Embezzlement is the fraudulent appropriation of property of any person or legal entity, legally obtained, to any use or purpose not intended or authorized by its owner, or the secretion of the property with the fraudulent intent to appropri

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with uttering a forged instruments in violation of 21 O.S. 1592, which provides: A. Every person who, with intent to defraud, utters or publishes as true any forged, altered or counterfeited instrument or any counterfeit gold or silver coin, the forging, altering or counterfeiting of which has previously been declared to

Muskogee, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with being a felon in possession of a firearm and ammunition with forfeiture in violation of 18 U.S.C. 922(g)(1). Reported by: Kent Morlan Russell Jeremy Doctor, age 37, of Longtown, Oklahoma, knowingly posse

Tyler, Texas, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1343, and acting as an animal dealer without a license in violation of 7 U.S.C. 2149. Reported by: Kent Morlan Kristine Michelle Hicks, 51, was the sole owner and operator

Austin, Texas, criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with wire fraud and engaging in monetary transactions with criminally derived proceeds in violation of 18 U.S.C. 1343 and 18 U.S.C. 1957 Reported by: Kent Morlan Mitchell David Slentz, 34, was in charge of accounti

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: ORGANIZED RETAIL CRIME, in violation of 21 O.S. 1731.2. which provides: A. Actions relating to theft, retail theft, or larceny shall be sufficient to constitute organized retail crime when two or more of the following circumstances occur: 1. The property taken is intended for resale; 2. Such property is ta

Brooklyn, New York, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with deprivation of right under color of law in violation of 18 U.S.C. 242, and use of a firearm during a crime of violence in violation of 18 U.S.C. 924(c)(1)(A)(i), 924(c)(1)(A)(ii), 924(c)(l)(A)(iii) and 3551. Reported by

Madison, Wisconsin, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with mail fraud. Reported by Kent Morlan Michel Poirier, 60, Montreal, Canada, orchestrated a mass marketing fraud scheme that targeted printing companies and consumers in the United States, including the Wes

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: ASSAULT WITH A DANGEROUS WEAPON, in violation of 21 O.S. 645 United States Department of Justice: The Assimilative Crimes Act, 18 U.S.C. § 13, makes state law applicable to conduct occurring on lands reserved or acquired by the Federal government as provided in 18 U.S.C. § 7(3), when the act or omission is n

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendant charged with lewd molestation in violation of 21 O.S. 1123(a) and possession of child sexual abuse material in violation of 21 O.S. 1021.2. Reported by: Kent Morlan 21 O.S. 1123 provides: A. It is a Class A3 felony

Sherman, Texas, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession with Intent to Distribute or Dispense a Controlled Substance Resulting in Death in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1) . On September 5, 2024, Andrew Michael Smith, 36, provided a woman with fentanyl and methamphetamine. Smith watched and recorded the victim for several hours as she began to show severe

Golden, Colorado, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with menacing. Reported by Kent Morlan Casey Simms’s charges resulted from a multiple-day altercation with his intimate partner. Simms and his girlfriend, K.B., were staying in a motel when they began

Spokane, Washington criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with conspiring to impede law enforcement officers or injure property used in the execution of their duties. Reported by Kent Morlan Jac Archer, Justice Forral, and Bajun Mavalwalla Ii Archer, Forral, and M

Portland, Oregon criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with two counts of maintaining a dangerous dog, ORS 609.098. Reported by Kent Morlan Under ORS 609.098(2), “[a] person commits the crime of maintaining a dangerous dog if the person is the keeper of a dog an

This case presents the question whether a defendant charged with vio- lating 18 U. S. C. §1519—which makes it a crime to knowingly falsify a document with the intent to obstruct a federal investigation—must be tried in the district where the falsification occurred, or whether he may alternatively be tried in the district where the federal investiga- tion was located. While employed by

Sapulpa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with obtaining food stamps by fraud in violation of 56 O.S. 243. Reported by Kent Morlan The States claimed that the defendant obtained $854.12 of food stands to which she was not entitled on August 10, 2024.

Sapulpa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with assault and battery on police officer, resisting an officer, and obstructing an officer. Reported by Kent Morlan TEXT CM;PH;NO CSR;4/15/26; EFREM GIBSON PRESENT FOR THE STATE, MARK MATHESON PRESEN