| Alana Marie Souza, et al. v. Brick House, Inc. |
|
Eugene, Oregon intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a 15 U.S.C. 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) violation theory. |
| United States of America v. Jon Q. Wright v. Cornhole Stop, LLC and Shirley Kowtko |
|
Detroit, Michigan intellectual property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on copyright infringement theories. $1 (12-06-2023 - MI) |
| Daniel William McKnight v. LawNewz, Inc. |
|
New York, New York intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
| Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe |
|
Akron, Ohio intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on 17 U.S.C. 101 a copyright infringement theory. |
| Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Roosters Cocktails, Inc. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma intellectual property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory under 17 U.S.C. 101. |
| Reed Timmer v. Medialinks TV, LLC |
|
Washington, DC intellectual property lawyer represent the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright violation theory under 17 U.S.C. 501. |
| Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe |
|
Baltimore, Maryland intellectual property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copy right infringement theory. |
| Allan Tannenbaum v. CityRealty.com, LLC |
|
New York, New York intellectual property lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyrights infringement law. |
| Christopher Sadowski v. Romanian-American Network, Inc. |
|
Chicago, Illinois intellectual property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
| Gregory P. Mango v. The Blark Wall Street Times, Inc. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma copyright lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
| Gregory P. Mango v. Newsmax Media, Inc. |
|
West Palm Beach, Florida intellectual property lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
| Michael Stokes v. Gold Productions, Inc., d/b/a Girls Night Out The Show |
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma copyright infringement lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a copyright infringement theory under 17 U.S.C. 501. |
| Evofem Biosciences, Inc. v. Padagis Israel Pharmaceuticals, Ltd. |
|
Newark, New Jersey intellectual property litigation lawyer represented the Plaintiff, who sued the Defendants on patent infringement theories. |
| DP Creations v. Frank Li, d/b/a "Dollbie" |
|
Salt Lake City, Utah intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
| Jose Ruiz v. Paramount Global, Inc. |
|
New York City, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
| Ajay Suresh v. Koyfin, Inc. and Rob Boris Koyfman |
|
New York, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
| James Messerschmidt v. EE Bar, LLC |
|
New York City, New York intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff that sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. $0 (08-04-2023 - NY) |
| Dawn Cutillo, et al. v. David Cutillo, et al. |
|
Allentown, Pennsylvania intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on copyright infringement theories. |
| Laurie Rubin v. Trendland, L.L.C. |
|
New York City, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory in violation of 17 U.S.C. 501, which provides: |
| John Kraljevich v. Courser Athletics, Inc. |
|
Boston, Massachusetts intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on copyright infringement theories. |
| Veranique Payton and Felton Payton, Jr. v. National Continental Insurance Company |
|
New Orleans, Louisiana personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant in an auto insurance liability theory. |
| Nathan Hansen v. Windsong Ranch Community Association, Inc. et al. |
|
Sherman, Texas personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a negligence theory. |
| Eagle View Technologies, Inc. and Pictometry Internsational Corp. v. Nearmap, U.S., Inc.; Nearmap Austrial Pty, Ltd.; and Nearmap, Ltd. |
|
Salt Lake City, Utah intellectual property law lawyers represented Plaintiff and Defendant in patent infringement throries. |
| B.E. Technology, LLC v. Twitter, Inc. and Google, LLC |
|
Wilmington, Delaware patent infringement lawyer represented Plaintiff, which sued Defendants claiming that they were violating "United States Patent Nos, 8,549,410 ("the '410 patentâ€), 8,549,411 ("the '411 patentâ€), and 8,769,440 ("the '440 patentâ€) (collectively "the Asserted Patentsâ€). D.1.1. All of the /Asserted Patents expired in 2018. D.I. 67 at 2. |
| Christopher Sadowski v. Impcto Latin New,s Inc., d/b/a Impacto Latino |
|
New York City, New York intellectual property lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a copyright infringement theory. |
|
Next Page |