Birmingham, Alabama criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with first-degree sodomy, see § 13A-6-63(a)(3), Ala. Code 1975, and sexual abuse of a child under the age 12 years old, see § 13A-6-69.1, Ala. Code 1975.

In November 2018, H.H., who was 10 years old and a fifth grader at McAdory Elementary, disclosed to her school counselor that her adoptive brother, 17-year-... More...   $0 (07-10-2025 - AL)

Miami, Florida civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a First Amendment violation theory.

John Labriola was a media aide for the Miami-Dade Board
of County Commissioners. Labriola v. Miami-Dade Cnty., 693 F.
Supp. 3d 1284, 1287 (S.D. Fla. 2023). In his own name and on his
own time, Labriola wrote an opinion piece that criticized the
Equality Act, an as-y... More...   $0 (07-10-2025 - FL)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

LEWD MOLESTATION, in violation of 21 O.S. 1123(A)
and
LEWD MOLESTATION, in violation of 21 O.S. 1123(A)

A. It is a felony for any person to knowingly and intentionally:

1. Make any oral, written or electronically or computer-generated lewd or indecent proposal to any child under sixt... More...   $0 (07-09-2025 - OK)

Wichita, Kansas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with recept and possession of child pornography.

Defendant decided to peruse Tumblr one night and found himself looking at a six-year-old boy’s genitals. Using the handle “tobeautifullwomen,” he chatted with Kyle Enzminger, whose handle was “kinkyolder53,” on the social media platform.
They discussed t... More...   $0 (07-09-2025 - KS)

Las Cruces, New Mexico criminal defense lawyer represented the Deendant charged with production of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2251(a), 2256(2)(A).

The Defendant entered to a plea agreement with the Government.

... More...   $0 (07-08-2025 - NM)

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with:

FORCIBLE SODOMY, in violation of 21 O.S. 888

A. Any person who forces another person to engage in the detestable and abominable crime against nature, pursuant to Section 886 of this title, upon conviction, is guilty of a felony punishable by imprisonment in the custody of the Department of Correctio... More...   $0 (07-07-2025 - OK)

DIowa City, Iowa criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with receiving child pornography.

The final Presentence Investigation Report (“PSR”) calculated an advisory sentencing guidelines range of 262 to 327 months’ imprisonment. maximum sentence for the single-count offense was 240 months’ imprisonment. Id. § 2252A(b)(1). Because the statutory maximum sentence w... More...   $0 (07-07-2025 - IA)

Omaha, Nebraska criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with one count of attempted production of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a) and 2251(e).

In October 2020, Wilson moved into a house with his then-girlfriend and her
two minor children, including her daughter B.Z. Wilson and his girlfriend stayed in
one bedroom, while B.Z. and the other m... More...   $0 (07-07-2025 - IA)

Wichita, Kansas family law lawyers represent man and wife in an adoption case.

"1. On or about December 17, 2023[,] Baby Boy [S.] was born in Wichita, Sedgwick [C]ounty[,] Kansas.

"2. [R.S.] . . . is the natural mother of Baby Boy [S.]. [R.S.] has filed a consent to allow Baby Boy [S.] to be adopted.

"3. In connection with the adoption proceeding, [R.S.] f... More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - KS)

Cleveland, Ohio criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Receipt and Distribution of Visual Depictions of Real Minors Engaged in Sexually Explicit Conduct and Possession of Child Pornography.

In 2022, an Iowa Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force investigated the peer-to-peer file-sharing network BitTorrent and found Eloshway’s IP address associated with seve... More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - OH)

San Angelo, Texas criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with production of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. 225

18 U.S.C. § 225 outlines the federal crime of engaging in a Continuing Financial Crimes Enterprise (CFCE). It specifically targets individuals who organize, manage, or supervise a series of financial crimes, and who personally receive substantial ... More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - TX)

Richmond, Virginia criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with violating a protective order.

On November 24, 2018, L.M. obtained a permanent protective order against appellant, with whom she had a young son. The protective order prohibited appellant from having "contact of any kind with" L.M. except as permitted by a custody or visitation order and from "commit[ting] ac... More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - VA)

Buffalo, New York disability lawyers represented the Petitioner seeking review of the denial of her application for Social Security: DIWC/DIWW disability by HHS.

In Social Security law, DIWC (Disabled Individual, Worker or Child) refers to disability claims under Title II of the Social Security Act, specifically for disabled workers and eligible children. DIWW (Disabled Widow/Widower Bene... More...   $0 (07-03-2025 - ny)

Buffalo, New York disability lawyer represented the Petitioner seeking review of the denial by HHS of her application for Social Security: DIWC/DIWW benefits.

* * *

In Social Security law, DIWC (Disabled Individual, Worker or Child) refers to disability claims under Title II of the Social Security Act, specifically for disabled workers and eligible children. DIWW (Disabled Widow/... More...   $0 (07-02-2025 - NY)

Knoxville, Tennessee family law lawyer represented the Defendant in a divorce action.

* * *

APPELLATE PROCEDURE. FINAL JUDGMENT REQUIREMENT. The case addresses whether the appellant could pursue an appeal in the absence of a final judgment from the trial court, which is a prerequisite for an appeal as of right according to court rules.

APPELLATE PROCEDURE. JURISDICTION.... More...   $0 (07-01-2025 - TN)

Boston, Massachusetts family law lawyers represented the husband and wife in a divorce action.

"In making a property division and alimony determination under G. L. c. 208, § 34, a judge must make findings indicating that [she] has considered all factors relevant under § 34, and has not considered any irrelevant factors." T.E. v. A.0., 82 Mass.App.Ct. 586, 592 (2012), quoting Bowring v.... More...   $0 (06-30-2025 - MA)