1983 Law
 
Thomas Austin v. The Estate of Norberto Morfa, et al.

Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on civil rights act violation theories. under 42 U.S.C. 1983.

Section 1983 provides an individual the right to sue state government employees and others acting "under color of state law" for civil rights violations.

The claims made and defenses asserted by the parties are not available.

More...   $1 (04-21-2024 - NM)

Christina Williams v. Management & Training Corporation, et al.

Jackson, Mississippi personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a civil rights violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 1983.

Section 1983 provides an individual the right to sue state government employees and others acting "under color of state law" for civil rights violations. Section 1983 does not provide civil rights; it is a means to enforce civil rights that already exist

More...   $0 (04-18-2024 - MS)

United States of America v. Artem Bautista David

Las Vegas, Nevada criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with conspiracy to smuggle heroin.

On June 21, 1990, the federal grand jury returned a one-count Indictment charging the defendant, Artem Bautista David, with conspiracy to import more than 20 kilos of heroin into the United States.

*1388 On July 13, 1990, David filed a Motion for Return of Property and S

More...   $0 (01-28-1991 - NV)

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. William Franklin

When Justice Went to Hell - Philadelphia, Pennsylvania criminal defense lawyer represented the Plaintiff who was charged with first-degree murder.

"William Franklin, was arrested because of an incident involving the murder of Joseph Hollis and the attempted murder of John Pickens. The facts adduced at trial, which were set forth by the lower court in an opinion filed May 24, 1983, may be

More...   $0 (12-01-1980 - PA)

Lamont Johnson v. City of Detroit, et al.

Detroit, Michigan civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on civil rights violation on 42 U.S.C. 1983 theories.

The claims made and defenses asserted by the parties are not available.

Section 1983 provides an individual the right to sue state government employees and others acting "under color of state law" for civil rights violations. Section 1983 does not provid

More...   $1511267 (03-15-2024 - MI)

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PHILIP LAYFIELD

San Francisco, California criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with wire fraud, mail fraud, and various tax offenses. .




Affirming Philip James Layfield's convictions for wire
fraud, mail fraud, and various tax offenses, the panel reject

More...   $0 (02-16-2024 - CA)

State of South Dakota v. Anthony Rome, Sr.

When Justice Went To Hell: Anthony Rome, Sr. picked up his son from the boy's Mother's house on October 19, 1986 and did not return him at the end of his court decreed visitation with the boy. Instead, Rome went on the run with the boy. The boy's mother reported and Anthony he was indicted and a warrant was issues for his arrest. In January, 1987, the FBI found and arrested Anthony.

R

More...   $0 (12-31-1987 - SD)

Francisco Duarte and Alejandro Gutierrez v. The City of Stockton

Sacramento, California civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the on excessive use of force Eight Amendment Constitutional rights violation theories.

In an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the
panel reversed the district court's dismissal of plaintiff's
false arrest and municipal liability claims, as well as the
district court's adverse summary

More...   $0 (02-07-2024 - CA)

Oji Konata Markham v. A. Tolbert, et al.

Minneapolis, Minnesota civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on prisoner civil rights violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 1983.

The U.S. Supreme Court has interpreted Section 1983 of the U.S. Code to permit prisoners to sue state correctional officials when the conditions of confinement fail to meet constitutional standards of physical security, adequate medic

More...   $0 (02-07-2024 - MN)

Whitney Croft, et al. v. Morgan County, et al.

Salt Lake City, Utah civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983.

This case was filed in the 2nd Judicial District Court, Morgan County, 230500113, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Plaintiffs were registered voters and residents of Morgan County who filed an application to submi

More...   $0 (01-31-2024 - UT)

State of Kansas v. KYLE TREVOR FLACK

Ottawa, Kansas, criminal defense lawyer presented the Defendant charged with first-degree murder, second-degree murder and felony possession of a firearm.

In 2013, Andrew Stout and two friends, including Steven White, lived at Stout's
house in rural Franklin County. Flack, another friend of Stout's, occasionally spent time
there. Flack brought a shotgun with him everywhere, usua

More...   $0 (01-19-2024 - KS)

Crystal Marie Daniels v. State of Oklahoma, ex rel Board of Regents for the University of Oklahoma

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma civil rights violation lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a sex discrimination theory.

During her time as a student in a chaplain residency program at OU Medicine, Inc., Plaintiff claims that she was subjected to racial and sexual discrimination, emotional distress, harassment, retaliation, and constructively discharged. (Doc. No. 24). Plai

More...   $1 (11-13-2023 - OK)

Monet Carter-Mixon v. City Tacoma, et al.

Seattle, Washington personal injury wrongful death lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983.

More...   $24500000 (12-31-2023 - WA)

Jason Andrews v. Jonesboro, Indiana

Fort Wayne, Indiana personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a civil rights violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 1983.

More...   $1 (01-16-2024 - IN)

Nathaniel Robinson v. Terry Peck, et al.

Hammond, Indiana personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on civil rights violations under 42 U.S.C. 1983.

On May 12, 2022, the plaintiff, Nathaniel Robinson filed a Complaint alleging various constitutional and state law claims against the defendant, Terry Peck (Peck), a Gary Police Officer, and other police officers with the Gary Police Depart

More...   $0 (01-02-2024 - IN)

Sheldon Scott v. City of South Bend, et al.

South Bend, Indiana personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories.


Two officers at the South Bend Police Department sued the City of South Bend for retaliatory conduct they say stemmed from their participation in a prior suit over alleged unlawful recording. One such officer, Sheldon Scott, also sued Kyle Lerch in his in

More...   $0 (01-23-2024 - IN)

Aaron Ware v. William Glover

Indianapolis, Indiana person injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a prison civil right violation theory under 42 U.S.C. 1983 theory.

More...   $1 (01-17-2024 - IN)

Ashley Leann Norris v. Tavaris Carr and Lincoln County

Winchester, Tennessee personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on 42:1983 Civil Rights Act violation theory.


Section 1983 of Title 42 of the United States Code is a crucial piece of American civil rights legislation known as the Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights. It grants citizens the right to sue state and local government officials for violati

More...   $1 (01-09-2024 - TN)

Mark Campbell, et al. v. Cheatham County Sheriff's Department, et al.

Nashville, Tennessee personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories.

. Mark and Sherrie Campbell filed a complaint under 42 U.S.C. §1983 against the Cheatham County Sheriff's Department, the Municipal Government of CheathamCounty, Cheatham County Sheriff Mike Breedlove, and Officers James Fox and Chri

More...   $1 (01-10-2024 - TN)

Sarah Hohenberg, et aux. v. Shelby County, Tennessee

Memphis, Tennessee real property law lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendant on a civil rights violation theory.

Hohenberg and Hanson owned homes in Memphis, Tennessee. They did not maintain them. Hohenberg failed to make repairs after a tree struck her roof. Hanson let the grass, weeds, and other plants grow wild and allowedtrash, debris, and personal prop

More...   $0 (01-15-2024 - TN)

United States of America v. Donald J. Sachtleben

Indianapolis, Indiana Criminal Defense Lawyer represented the Defendant Disclosing National Defense Information And Distributing Child Pornography




United States Attorney Joseph H. Hogsett announced this morning that Donald J. Sachtleben, age 55, of Carmel, a fo

More...   $0 (11-14-2014 - IN)

Elmer Daniels v. United States of America, et al.

Wilmington, Delaware personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on Federal Tort Claim Act civil rights violation theories.

The Complaint




Plaintiff Elmer Daniels, by his undersigned attorneys, files this Complaint against the United
States of America, Michael P. Malone, the City of Wilmington, Philip Saggione III, and John Does

More...   $0 (12-11-2020 - DE)

Ronnie Wallace Long v. City of Concord, et al.

Raleigh, North Carolina personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories.

According to United States District Court Judge James C. Dever, III:

"Long was wrongfully incarcerated for more than 44 years for a burglary and rape he did not commit. See Am. Compl. [D.E. 24] ¶¶ 1-2. Throughout his incarceration, Long maintained a

More...   $25000000 (01-11-2024 - NC)

State of Rhode Island v. John Quattrocchi, III

Providence, Rhode Island defendant John Quattrocchi, III, was accused in 1882 of sexually assaulting the young daughter of his girlfriend on two occasions some 15 years earlier.

The "victim" claimed that he has a series of flashbacks when he was 19-years old.

The Supreme Court of Rhode Island described the facts of the case as follows:

"The complaining witness, who shall

More...   $0 (12-31-1994 - RI)

Leshaun Benjamin v. Alicia Sanchez

Milwaukee, Wisconsin personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a civil rights violation theory.

Plaintiff Leshaun Benjamin, who is represented by counsel, is proceeding under 42 U.S.C. §1983 on an Eighth Amendment
claim against a nurse at the Milwaukee Mental Health Complex (MMHC).

The plaintiff alleges that on September 8—he doesn'

More...   $0 (12-29-2023 - WI)

Next Page