California Estoppel Law
Jack Lee v. Cheng-Chie Lee
Santa Ana, California family law lawyers represented the parties in a divorce.<br> <br> Cheng-Chie Lee, who goes by the nickname "Jeff," contests findings made after a bench trial on competing petitions filed by himself and his older brother regarding assets in their parents' trust. Jeff's[1] petition sought to invalidate a trust document which disinherited him. His brother, Jack, responded with a... More...
$0 (04-20-2025 - CA)United States of America v. LUKE WILSON
<center><h2><font color="red"><center> San Francisco, CA - Criminal defense lawyer represented defendant with a possession and distribution of child pornography charge. </h2></font></b></i></center><br> The panel vacated a conviction for possession and <br> distribution of child pornography, reversed the district <br> court's denial of a motion to suppress, and remanded for <br> further proceeding... More...
$0 (11-01-2021 - CA)SNOQUALMIE INDIAN TRIBE, a federally recognized Indian tribe on its own behalf and as parens patriae on behalf of its members v. STATE OF WASHINGTON; JAY ROBERT INSLEE, Governor; KELLY SUSEWIND, Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife Director
<center><h2><font color="red"><center> San Francisco, CA - Indian Treaty Rights lawyer represented Plaintiff-Appellant with seeking a declaration that it is a signatory to the Treaty of Point Elliott and that its reserved off-reservation hunting and gathering rights under the Treaty continue.. </h2></font></b></i></center><br> <br> The Treaty has been the subject of extensive litigation. <br> Beca... More...
$0 (10-03-2021 - CA)United States of America v. LUKE NOEL WILSON
<center><h2><font color="red"><center>San Francisco - Criminal defense lawyer represented defendant <br> with a possession and distribution of child pornography charge.</h2></font></b></i></center><br> <br> We once again consider the application of the Fourth <br> Amendment's warrant requirement to new forms of <br> communication technology. See, e.g., United States v. Cano, <br> 934 F.3d 1002 (9t... More...
$0 (10-02-2021 - CA)In re J.P., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law, Santa Clara County Department of family and Children's Services v. M.D.
M.D. (mother) appeals from the juvenile court’s order granting her ex-boyfriend<br> (Albert) presumed parent status for her son, J.P. Mother argues that the juvenile court did<br> not have the authority under Welfare and Institutions Code section 3851<br> to reconsider its prior order in which it found that Albert did not qualify as a presumed parent to J.P.<br> We disagree and conclude that the... More...
$0 (10-04-2020 - CA)Arash Alborzi v. University of Southern California
Plaintiffs Arash Alborzi, M.D., and Arash Alborzi, M.D.,<br> Inc. sued defendants University of Southern California, Keck<br> School of Medicine of USC, and USC Verdugo Hills Hospital<br> (collectively, USC); as well as Concord Hospitalist Group and<br> Elevate Health Group. Alborzi and his corporation were part of a<br> panel of on-call physicians at Verdugo Hills Hospital. Plaintiffs<br> alleged... More...
$0 (10-01-2020 - CA)Corinna Reyes v. Kim Kruger
Appellants Corinna Reyes and Golden State Care Collective, Inc. (together,<br> “Reyes” or “appellants”), filed a complaint for malicious prosecution against property<br> owner Kim Kruger and Kim Kruger Trust (together, Kruger) and Kruger’s former<br> attorney, Todd Rothbard (Rothbard), for what Reyes contended was a wrongful eviction.<br> The trial court granted Kruger’s and Rothbard�... More...
$0 (09-28-2020 - CA)Oakland Bulk and Oversized Terminal, LLC v. City of Oakland
Oakland, CA - Breach of Contract, SLAPP<br> <br> <center><br> <img width="400" src="http://www.morelawtv.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Oakland_CA.jpg"><br> </center><br> <br> The City of Oakland (City) entered into a series of agreements with<br> Oakland Bulk and Oversized Terminal, LLC (OBOT) for the development of<br> the land at the site of the former Oakland Army Base. It was to be a huge<br>... More...
$0 (09-20-2020 - CA)Mohamed Aljabban v. Fontana Indoor Swap Meet, Inc.
San Bernardino, CA - Landlord and Tenant<br> <br> <center><br> <img width="400" src="http://www.morelawtv.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/San_Bernardion_CA.jpg"><br> </center><br> <br> A. The Swap Meet<br> FISM operates an indoor swap meet in the city of Fontana (the Swap<br> Meet), consisting of a collection of approximately 75 businesses operating<br> under one roof in individually assigned space... More...
$0 (09-12-2020 - CA)Richard Marshall v. Daniel Webster
<center><br> <img width="400" src="http://www.morelawtv.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/Yreka_CA.png"><br> </center><br> <br> Plaintiffs Richard and Susan Marshall sued for defamation and intentional<br> infliction of emotional distress, alleging that defendant Daniel Webster made maliciously<br> false and defamatory statements about them in an electronic book and on social media. <br> On May 11, 2... More...
$0 (09-06-2020 - CA)Richard Robinson v. Southern Counties Oil Company
Plaintiff Richard Robinson, on behalf of himself and other aggrieved employees,<br> appeals from the judgment entered in favor of his former employer defendant Southern<br> Counties Oil Company (Southern Counties). Robinson’s complaint seeks civil penalties<br> under the Labor Code Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA) (Lab. Code,1<br> § 2698 et seq.) based on Southern Counties’s alleg... More...
$0 (08-14-2020 - CA)Richard Paul Rutgard v. City of Los Angeles
California’s Eminent Domain Law (Code Civ. Proc.,<br> § 1230.010 et seq.)<br> 1 —and, in particular, Code of Civil Procedure<br> section 1245.245—provides that when “[p]roperty acquired by a<br> public entity [through eminent domain] . . . is not used for [its<br> intended] public use . . . within 10 years of adoption of the<br> resolution of necessity [that authorized its taking],” the... More...
$0 (07-31-2020 - CA)Ronald Talley v. County of Fresno
Plaintiff Ronald Talley pleaded nolo contendre to a criminal offense for which he<br> was sentenced to 18 days in the Fresno County Jail. Rather than serving those days in<br> county jail, plaintiff was deemed eligible to serve the sentence by participation in the<br> Adult Offender Work Program (AOWP) administered by Fresno County’s Probation<br> Department. Plaintiff was injured while performi... More...
$0 (07-11-2020 - CA)WFG National Title Insurance Company v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
This matter arises out of an alleged mortgage fraud scheme<br> designed to defraud mortgage lenders and involving numerous<br> realtors, loan brokers, loan officers, and real estate brokers. One<br> defrauded lender is Milestone Financial d/b/a Alviso Funding<br> (Alviso), the original plaintiff in this case.<br> The operative complaint alleges that various defendants set<br> up a sham transaction... More...
$0 (07-08-2020 - CA)State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Readylink Healthcare, Inc.
Defendant ReadyLink Healthcare, Inc. (ReadyLink) is a nurse staffing company<br> that places nurses in hospitals, typically on a short-term basis. Plaintiff State<br> Compensation Insurance Fund (SCIF) is a public enterprise fund created by statute as a<br> workers' compensation insurer. Like private workers' compensation insurers, SCIF<br> provides workers' compensation insurance to employers. Th... More...
$0 (06-15-2020 - CA)Matthew Boermeester v. Ainsley Carry
Matthew Boermeester was expelled from the University of<br> Southern California (USC) for committing intimate partner violence<br> against Jane Roe.1 The superior court denied his petition for writ of<br> administrative mandate to set aside the expulsion. He appeals,<br> contending, among other things, that the process leading to his<br> expulsion violated his right to a fair hearing. We conclude ... More...
$0 (06-01-2020 - CA)J. Niley Dorit v. Jack Noe
In January 2018, Noe hired Dorit to evaluate the medical records of<br> Noe’s deceased mother for a potential medical malpractice suit against her<br> doctors. The parties signed a fee agreement in which Noe agreed to pay Dorit<br> a $10,000 non-refundable retainer fee. This sum was intended to cover<br> Dorit’s time spent evaluating the claim, as well as “the costs of additional<br> medical... More...
$0 (05-30-2020 - CA)Third Laguna Hills Mutual v. Jeff A. Joslin
Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation (SLAPP suits) are meritless<br> lawsuits designed to punish parties for protected activities (the right to petition or free<br> speech). A party can move to strike a SLAPP suit by filing an anti-SLAPP motion.<br> (Code Civ. Proc., § 425.16.)1<br> There is a two-prong test: the moving party must show the<br> lawsuit arises from its protected activit... More...
$0 (05-27-2020 - CA)SLPR, LLC v. San Diego Unified Port District
<center><h1><p style="border:3px; border-style:solid; border-color:#FF0000; padding:<br> 0em;"><a href="http://www.callmorelaw.com/" target="_new">MoreLaw Receptionists</a></br><font Color="Red">VOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services<br> Call 918-582-6422 Today<br> </font></h1><P></center> <br> <br> Plaintiffs SLPR, L.L.C. (SLPR), Ann Goodfellow, trustee of the survivor's trust of<br> the Go... More...
$0 (05-25-2020 - CA)James Willis v. City of Carlsbad
<center><h1><p style="border:3px; border-style:solid; border-color:#FF0000; padding:<br> 0em;"><a href="http://www.callmorelaw.com/" target="_new">MoreLaw Receptionists</a></br><font Color="Red">VOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services<br> Call 918-582-6422 Today<br> </font></h1><P></center> <br> <br> Plaintiff and appellant James Willis, a peace officer employed by the Carlsbad<br> Police Dep... More...
$0 (05-16-2020 - CA)Lynn Schuler v. Capital Agricultural Property Services, Inc.
In this negligence/trespass action, Lynn Shuler and<br> Michael Shuler appeal from the judgment entered after a jury<br> returned a special verdict in their favor and against respondents<br> Capital Agricultural Property Services, Inc., et al. Appellants<br> claim the trial court erroneously reduced by 68 percent the<br> economic damages awarded by the jury. The court made the<br> reduction becaus... More...
$0 (05-15-2020 - CA)Crosno Construction, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America
North Edwards Water District (the District) selected Clark Bros., Inc. (Clark) as its<br> general or direct contractor on a public works project to build an arsenic removal water<br> treatment plant. Clark hired subcontractor Crosno Construction (Crosno) to build and<br> coat two steel reservoir tanks. The subcontract contained a "pay-when-paid" provision<br> that stated Clark would pay Crosno wit... More...
$0 (04-18-2020 - CA)501 East 51st Street, Long-Beach-10, LLC v. Kookmin Best Insurance Co., Ltd.
<br> <center><h1><p style="border:3px; border-style:solid; border-color:#FF0000; padding:<br> 0em;"><a href="http://www.callmorelaw.com/" target="_new">MoreLaw Receptionists</a></br><font Color="Red">VOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services<br> Call 918-582-6422 Today<br> </font></h1><P></center> <br> <br> This is an insurance bad faith lawsuit. Plaintiff 501 East<br> 51st Street, Long Beach-1... More...
$0 (04-17-2020 - CA)Justin Kim v. Reins International California, Inc.
This case presents an issue of first impression: Do<br> employees lose standing to pursue a claim under the Labor Code<br> Private Attorneys General Act of 2004 (PAGA; Lab. Code, § 2698<br> et seq.)1<br> if they settle and dismiss their individual claims for<br> Labor Code violations? We conclude the answer is no.<br> Settlement of individual claims does not strip an aggrieved<br> employee of sta... More...
$0 (04-13-2020 - CA)Frederic Carl Sannmann v. Department of Justice
In 1997, Frederic Sannmann pleaded guilty to felony robbery (Pen. Code, § 211),1<br> which rendered him ineligible to own firearms (former § 12021, now § 29800). In 2003,<br> he successfully moved under section 1203.4, subdivision (a) (hereafter § 1203.4(a)) to set<br> aside his conviction for most purposes. By statute, this relief did not restore Sannmann's<br> right to own firearms. (§ 1203... More...
$0 (04-10-2020 - CA)Delores Tarin v. Rochelle Lind
Plaintiff and appellant Dolores Tarin (Dolores) appeals<br> from the judgment after the trial court granted three judgments<br> on the pleadings in favor of defendants and respondents Rochelle<br> Lind (Rochelle) and Jesse Tarin (Jesse)1 (collectively,<br> defendants), and Dolores dismissed her remaining claims.<br> Dolores alleged that defendants interfered in Dolores’s<br> relationship with he... More...
$0 (04-04-2020 - CA)Michael Reynaud v. Technicolor Creative Services USA, Inc.
<center><h1><p style="border:3px; border-style:solid; border-color:#FF0000; padding:<br> 0em;"><a href="http://www.callmorelaw.com/" target="_new">MoreLaw Receptionists</a></br><font Color="Red">VOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services<br> Call 918-582-6422 Today<br> </font></h1><P></center> <br> <br> Plaintiffs and respondents Michael Reynaud and Fiona<br> Reynaud1 prevailed at trial on their... More...
$0 (03-25-2020 - CA)Fidelity National Home Warranty Company cases
<center><h1><p style="border:3px; border-style:solid; border-color:#FF0000; padding:<br> 0em;"><a href="http://www.callmorelaw.com/" target="_new">MoreLaw Receptionists</a></br><font Color="Red">VOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services<br> Call 918-582-6422 Today<br> </font></h1><P></center> <br> <br> Plaintiffs Dan Kaplan, James Baker, Janice Fistolera, Fernando Palacios, and<br> Hamid Aliaba... More...
$0 (03-22-2020 - CA)Victrola 89, LLC v. Jaman Properties 8, LLC
After respondent Victrola 89, LLC (Victrola) purchased<br> a house (the Property) from appellant Jaman Properties 8,<br> LLC (JP8), Victrola filed suit against JP8, appellant Jaman<br> Properties, Inc. (JP), and their principal, appellant Michael<br> Manheim (collectively, the Jaman Parties), among others,<br> regarding allegedly undisclosed and unrepaired defects in<br> the Property. Based on the... More...
$0 (03-12-2020 - CA)Victrola 89, LLC v. Jaman Properties 8, LLC
After respondent Victrola 89, LLC (Victrola) purchased<br> a house (the Property) from appellant Jaman Properties 8,<br> LLC (JP8), Victrola filed suit against JP8, appellant Jaman<br> Properties, Inc. (JP), and their principal, appellant Michael<br> Manheim (collectively, the Jaman Parties), among others,<br> regarding allegedly undisclosed and unrepaired defects in<br> the Property. Based on the... More...
$0 (03-12-2020 - CA)In re the Marriage of Mary Kay Brewster and Chris Clevenger, Mary Kay Brewster v. Chris Clevenger
In this marital dissolution proceeding, the trial court entered judgment denying<br> appellant Mary Kay Brewster’s (Mary Kay) request for spousal support orders because<br> she suffered criminal convictions for acts of domestic violence against respondent Chris<br> Clevenger (Chris). In doing so, the trial court determined Mary Kay had not overcome<br> the rebuttable presumption set forth in Fam... More...
$0 (03-09-2020 - CA)Textron, Inc. v. Travelers Casualty and Surety Company
This insurance coverage dispute between Appellant Textron Inc.<br> (Textron) and respondent Travelers Casualty and Surety Company<br> (Travelers) raises the issue whether an earlier choice of law ruling in a<br> Rhode Island coverage action between the parties qualifies for collateral<br> and judicial estoppel effect, thus precluding Textron from seeking<br> coverage under California law in the cu... More...
$0 (02-27-2020 - CA)Hansel Phelps Construction Company v. Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Plaintiff Hensel Phelps Construction Company (Phelps)<br> was the low bidder on a public works contract awarded by the<br> California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR)<br> through competitive bidding, and commenced work on the<br> project. Another bidder challenged the award of the contract to<br> Phelps, and was successful, obtaining a ruling in a San Diego<br> trial court that ... More...
$0 (02-26-2020 - CA)Philadelphia Indemnity Insurance Company v. SMG Holdings, Inc.
This case concerns whether a binding arbitration clause in an insurance policy<br> issued by plaintiff Philadelphia Indemnity Ins. Co., applies to a third party, defendant<br> SMG Holdings, Inc. The trial court ruled it does not. We conclude it does.<br> The policy had been issued to Future Farmers of America, which was holding an<br> event inside the Fresno Convention Center. Future Farmers had l... More...
$0 (01-31-2020 - CA)Ruben Gamerberg v. 3000 E. 11th St., LLC
In 1950 the owner of property in Boyle Heights agreed to<br> provide eight parking spaces to the owner of a neighboring lot<br> who wanted to build a warehouse exceeding the maximum<br> allowable square footage then permitted by the Los Angeles<br> Municipal Code (LAMC). A notarized parking affidavit<br> documenting the agreement was filed with the Los Angeles<br> Department of Building and Safety... More...
$0 (01-22-2020 - CA)Nilay B. Patel v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
Plaintiff Nilay B. Patel contracted with defendant<br> Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC (MBUSA) to lease a vehicle. During<br> the lease period, the vehicle’s navigation system experienced<br> recurring problems, which MBUSA was unable to repair. Patel<br> sued MBUSA under the Song-Beverly Consumer Warranty Act<br> (the Act, Civ. Code, §§ 1790-1795.8).1 At trial, the jury found the<br> vehicle had a sub... More...
$0 (01-01-2020 - CA)Jeremiah Mathews v. Happy Valley Conference Center, Inc.
<br> Plaintiff Jeremiah Mathews worked as a maintenance supervisor and a cook for<br> defendant Happy Valley Conference Center, Inc. (Happy Valley), which hosts seminars,<br> retreats, and camps on a 30-acre property in the Santa Cruz Mountains. Happy Valley is<br> a subordinate affiliate of defendant Community of Christ (the Church). When a younger<br> male employee confided in plaintiff that Hap... More...
$0 (12-16-2019 - CA)Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs v. County of Los Angeles
The Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs (ALADS)<br> appeals from a judgment following the trial court’s ruling<br> sustaining a demurrer to ALADS’s complaint without leave to<br> amend. ALADS sued respondent County of Los Angeles (County)<br> concerning the County’s alleged breach of a labor agreement.<br> The trial court sustained the County’s demurrer on the sole<br> ground that ... More...
$0 (12-03-2019 - CA)In re the Marriage of Mark and Terri Bittenson, Mark Bittenson v. Terri Bittenson
Family law practitioners should read this opinion with the<br> following in mind: “[F]amily law court is a court of equity . . . .”<br> (E.g., In re Marriage of Boswell (2014) 225 Cal.App.4th 1172,<br> 1174.) Appellate attack upon a discretionary trial court ruling is<br> an “uphill battle.” (Estate of Gilkison (1998) 65 Cal.App.4th<br> 1443, 1448.)<br> Mark Bittenson (husband) appeals a p... More...
$0 (10-22-2019 - CA)Starview Property, LLC v. Stephen Y. Lee
In this acrimonious dispute between neighbors over a<br> driveway easement, defendants Stephen and Tracy Lee appeal<br> the trial court’s denial of a motion pursuant to Code of Civil<br> Procedure section 425.16, the anti-SLAPP statute,1 directed at<br> three claims plaintiff Starview Property, LLC asserted for the<br> first time in its first amended complaint. Although the Lees’<br> motion wa... More...
$0 (10-19-2019 - CA)