Arizona Invitee Law
Walter Knox v. Staples The Office Superstore, LLC
¶1 Plaintiff Walter Knox appeals the superior court’s summary<br> judgment for defendant Staples the Office Superstore, LLC (Staples), on his<br> negligence claim. For the following reasons, we reverse the grant of<br> summary judgment.<br> <br> FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY<br> <br> ¶2 Knox tripped and fell on an A-frame, or “sandwich board,”<br> sign that was lying flat on the floor of ... More...
$0 (02-28-2017 - AZ)Robert M. Delci v. Gutierrez Trucking Company
¶1 Plaintiffs appeal the superior court's order granting judgment on the pleadings for Defendants. Concluding that the owner/operator of a motor vehicle has no duty to protect the public from the negligent driving of a car thief, we affirm the superior court's judgment.<br> <br> FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND<br> <br> ¶2 On July 15, 2006, Robert M. Delci, IV, and his son, Robert M. Delci, V, ... More...
$0 (04-19-2012 - AZ)Pamela Goodman v. Staples The Office Superstore, LLC
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(a)(2) requires a party to timely disclose a written report of a witness "if the witness is one retained or specially employed to provide expert testimony in the case . . . .†Generally speaking, treating physicians are excused from this requirement. They are a species of percipient witness. They are not specially hired to provide expert testimony; rather, t... More...
$0 (05-03-2011 - AZ)Juanita M. Tostado v. City of Laek Havasu
¶1 Juanita M. Tostado ("Appellantâ€) appeals the superior court's grant of summary judgment in favor of the City of Lake Havasu ("the Cityâ€). Appellant argues on appeal that the superior court improperly found that the City had absolute immunity. For the reasons discussed below, we reverse the superior court's grant of summary judgment and remand the case for further proceedings.<br> <... More...
$0 (09-10-2008 - AZ)<a href="http://www.apltwo.ct.state.az.us/cv20020012.pdf" target="_new">Daniel Bloxham, et al. v. Glock, Inc., et al.</a>
1 Appellants Daniel Bloxham, Barbar a Bloxham, and Diana Spalding ("the Bloxhams"), sued appellees Glock Inc., Glock Ges m.b.H. ("Glock"), Pat McMann, Joan McMann, and McMann's Roadrunner Inc., ("the McManns") for negligence after a third party murdered the Bloxhams' son and Spalding's daughter ("the victims") with a handgun manufactured by Glock and sold at a gun show operated by the McManns.... More...
$0 (08-30-2002 - AZ)