Arizona FLSA Law
<H2> Shawn Martin v. Honest Air Care and Home Services LLC, et a.l
Phoenix, Arizona, employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a theory. AI Overview Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) violations involve employers failing to meet minimum wage, overtime, recordkeeping, and child labor standards, common examples including off-the-clock work, improper tip handling, misclassifying workers, and not paying correct overtime or minimum wages, leading to b... More...
$1 (12-19-2025 - AZ)Darwin Harris v. National Waterproofing & Roofing, LLC
Phoenix, Arizona employment law lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on a Fair Labor Standards Act violation theory.<br> <br> <br> Plaintiffs Darwin Harris and Jason McCoy (collectively, "Plaintiffsâ€) bring this action against Defendants National Waterproofing & Roofing, LLC, and Kirk Poteet (collectively, "Defendantsâ€) to recover allegedly unpaid overtime wages under the ... More...
$0 (09-07-2022 - AZ)Ann Garcia v. Salvation Army
<center><br> <img width="300" src="http://www.azd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/styles/medium/public/Phoenix.jpg?itok=CVWODP2F"><br> </center><br> The Salvation Army is an evangelical ministry founded in 1865 by William Booth, a former Methodist minister.1 The Salvation Army’s religious tenets differed from traditional Methodism in rejecting the importance of sacraments and emphasizing strong... More...
$0 (03-18-2019 - AZ)Alec Marsh v. J. Alexander's, L.L.C.
Congress enacted the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) in 1938 in response to a national concern that the price of American development was the exploitation of an entire class of low-income workers. President Roosevelt, who pushed for fair labor legislation, famously declared: “The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provi... More...
$0 (09-19-2018 - AZ)Michael Shane Christopher v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation, dba GlaxoSmithKline
Plaintiffs-Appellants Michael Christopher and Frank Buchanan appeal the judgment of the district court that they are not entitled to overtime pay under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (FLSA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201 et seq. Plaintiffs were employed as Pharmaceutical Sales Representatives (PSRs) for Defendant-Appellee SmithKline Beecham Corporation d/b/a GlaxoSmithKline (Glaxo). Glaxo classifie... More...
$0 (02-14-2011 - AZ)Patti Howell v. Pete Dodap
¶1 Robert Howell and Pete Hodap bring separate appeals related to a civil suit alleging multiple constitutional and tort violations arising out of the execution of a search warrant. Patti Howell and Randy Johnson submit cross-appeals. For the following reasons and those set forth in the simultaneously filed memorandum decision,1 we affirm in part and reverse in part.<br> <br> I.<br> <br> ¶2 On W... More...
$0 (05-12-2009 - AZ)<a href="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/11AD05B0286183D288256EAF0053B497/$file/0216632.pdf?openelement" target="_new">Kurt Snyder, et al. v. The Navajo Nation</a>
<P>Appellants in these consolidated appeals are law enforce-ment officers of the Navajo Nation Division of Public Safety ("DPS") who filed actions against both the Navajo Nation and the United States claiming violations of the Fair Labor Stan-dards Act ("FLSA"), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-219. The district court dismissed the claims against the Navajo Nation, holding that law enforcement was an intr... More...
$0 (06-15-2004 - AZ)