Alaska Lewd Molestation Law

<center> <img width="600" src="http://khq.images.worldnow.com/images/5367021_G.jpg"> <P> United States of America v. Craig A. Morgenstern </center>

Spokane, WA - Spokane Doctor Sentenced to Life Imprisonment Following a Jury Verdict for 12 Counts of Aggravated Sexual Abuse of Children<br> <br> Craig A. Morgenstern, age 47, of Nine Mile Falls, Washington was sentenced to 12 life terms in federal prison after a jury found him guilty of 12 counts of Aggravated Sexual Abuse of a Child. Senior United States District Judge W. Fremming Nielsen also ... More...

$0 (08-08-2016 - AK)
United States of America v. Thomas Schopp

Juneau, AK - Sex Offender Sentenced To Life Imprisonment<br> <br> Twice Convicted Child Molester Produced Child Pornography While on Parole<br> <br> Thomas Schopp, 52, resident of Juneau, Alaska, was sentenced to life imprisonment for production of child pornography in violation of 18 U.S.C. ยง 2251(a)(1).<br> <br> Schopp had two prior convictions in state court for child molestation. In those ca... More...

$0 (08-01-2016 - AK)
<a href="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/11BBADA028A095D58825712D00016761/$file/0335701.pdf?openelement" target="_new">Joseph Frederick v. Deborah Morse, Juneau School Board</a>

<P>This is a First Amendment student speech case. <P>Facts <P>One January day, Coca-Cola and other private sponsors supported a "Winter Olympics Torch Relay" in Juneau, Alaska. Students were released from school so that they could watch the Olympic torch pass by. Joseph Frederick, then an 18-year-old senior at Juneau-Douglas High School, never made it to school that morning because he got ... More...

$0 (03-14-2006 - AK)
<a href="http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/ca9/newopinions.nsf/E340D76D1D4D2F3E882570700053DE5A/$file/0435029.pdf?openelement" target="_new">Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al. v. National Education Association, Alaska, et al.</a>

<P>This appeal presents the question whether harassing conduct directed at female employees may violate Title VII in the absence of direct evidence that the harassing conduct or the intent that produced it was because of sex. We hold that offensive conduct that is not facially sex-specific nonetheless may violate Title VII if there is sufficient circumstantial evidence of qualitative and qua... More...

$0 (09-03-2005 - AK)