Norman, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with First Degree burglary.

The sole issue raised by the State is whether there was sufficient evidence presented at preliminary hearing to prove the element of breaking an outer door or wall for the crime of burglary in the first degree. Specifically, whether the crime of first degree burglary may be committed by... More...   $0 (02-05-2024 - OK)

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma consumer credit lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Fair Credit Reporting Act violation theory.

§ 1681 et seq., governs access to consumer credit report records and promotes accuracy, fairness, and the privacy of personal information assembled by Credit Reporting Agencies (CRAs). A CRA is an entity that assembles and sells credit informat... More...   $1 (01-29-2024 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma consumer credit lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Fair Credit Reporting Act violation theory.

15 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., governs access to consumer credit report records and promotes accuracy, fairness, and the privacy of personal information assembled by Credit Reporting Agencies (CRAs). A CRA is an entity that assembles and sells credit infor... More...   $1 (01-26-2024 - OK)

Los Angeles, California personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant seeking damages for being depicted in a pornography series.


Plaintiff “Lily” is a victim depicted in a child pornography series and brings this action to recover liquidated damages, fees, and costs, under 18 U.S.C. § 2255(a) based on Defendant's conviction for knowing possession of ch... More...   $0 (12-29-2023 - CA)

Tulsa, Oklahoma consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on a Fair Debt Collection Act violation under 15 U.S.C. 1692, which provides:

§1692g. Validation of debts
(a) Notice of debt; contents

Within five days after the initial communication with a consumer in connection with the collection of any debt, a debt collector shall, unless the follow... More...   $1 (12-14-2023 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on Fair Credit Reporting Act violation theories under 15 U.S.C. 1961, which provides:

(a) Accuracy and fairness of credit reportingThe Congress makes the following findings:
(1) The banking system is dependent upon fair and accurate credit reporting. Inaccurate credit reports directly impair the... More...   $1 (12-20-2023 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma consumer credit lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant Fair Credit Reporting Act under 15 U.S.C. 1681, which provides:

(a) Accuracy and fairness of credit reportingThe Congress makes the following findings:
(1) The banking system is dependent upon fair and accurate credit reporting. Inaccurate credit reports directly impair the efficiency of the bank... More...   $1 (03-28-2023 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma consumer credit lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on Fair Credit Reporting Act violation theory.

"The Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) is a federal law in the United States that regulates the collection, dissemination, and use of consumer credit information by consumer reporting agencies (CRAs) such as Experian, Equifax, and TransUnion.

Here... More...   $1 (12-19-2023 - OK)

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant alleging that defendants placed a surveillance device inside the cab of his tractor-trailer, and he claims that this caused him severe emotional distress. Plaintiff alleged claims under the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2520 (ECPA), and 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and he also alleged state law cl... More...   $1 (12-07-2023 - OK)

Defendant Ronald Coleman appeals the district court’s denial of
a motion to suppress the fruits of a warrant for vehicle tracking and a residential search warrant
>
No. 18-1083 United States v. Coleman Page 2
on the grounds that the warrants lacked probable cause and that law enforcement’s installation of
the vehicle tracker violated the Fourth Amendment. Because the wa... More...   $0 (12-28-2023 - OH)

Saginaw, Michigan civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who claimed that her fourth Amendment rights were violated by Defendant.

Between 2014 and 2017, Tabitha Hoskins chalked Taylor’s tires on fifteen separate
occasions and issued her citations in kind. Each citation included the date and time the chalk
was placed on her vehicle’s tires. The cost of a citation start... More...   $0 (12-28-2023 - OH)

Detroit, Michigan criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with racketeering and possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime.

After ten days of trial, a jury convicted Defendant William S. Steele (“Steele”) of (1) Racketeering Conspiracy (“RICO Conspiracy”) under 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d), and (2) Possession of a Firearm in Furtherance of a Drug ... More...   $0 (12-28-2023 - OH)

Grand Rapids, Michigan personal injury lawyer represented the Appellant who sued the Defendant on a Federal Tort Claims Act theory.

On July 18, 2014, Defendants were searching for a criminal suspect named Aaron Davison. Police believed that Davison had committed felony home invasion, and the State of Michigan had issued a warrant for his arrest. Defendants were members of a “joint fugit... More...   $0 (12-28-2023 - OH)

This case is one of many that have arisen from the government’s
investigation into a child pornography website known as “Playpen.” Andrew Moorehead was
indicted for possession and receipt of child pornography based on his activity on the website.
>
No. 18-5216 United States v. Moorehead Page 2
He moved to suppress the evidence against him, arguing that it was obtained... More...   $0 (12-28-2023 - OH)

This case is one of many that have arisen from the government’s
investigation into a child pornography website known as “Playpen.” Andrew Moorehead was
indicted for possession and receipt of child pornography based on his activity on the website.
>
No. 18-5216 United States v. Moorehead Page 2
He moved to suppress the evidence against him, arguing that it was obtained... More...   $0 (12-28-2023 - OH)

Cleveland, Ohio criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with felony possession of a firearm.

Two men tried to force their way into David
McCullough’s residence. McCullough fought back with a handgun, killing one of the men and
prompting the other man to flee. But McCullough then left his residence and shot and killed the
second man. After McCullough plea... More...   $0 (12-27-2023 - MI)

Norton Shores, Michigan criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with open murder and first-degree child abuse.

Shanda Vander Ark, was accused of killing her 15-year-old son Timothy Ferguson in violation of 750.316 of the Michigan Penal Code, which provides:

(1) Except as provided in sections 25 and 25a of chapter IX of the code of criminal procedure, 1927 PA 175... More...   $0 (12-16-2023 - MI)

Tulsa, Oklahoma consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Fair Debt Collection Act violation theory.

See: 15 U.S.C. 1692.

(a) Abusive practices

There is abundant evidence of the use of abusive, deceptive, and unfair debt collection practices by many debt collectors. Abusive debt collection practices contribute to the number of personal... More...   $0 (12-14-2023 - OK)

Boston, Massachusetts consumer credit lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on Fair Debt Collection Act violation theories.

15 U.S.C. 1692, et seq. provides:

(a) Abusive practices

There is abundant evidence of the use of abusive, deceptive, and unfair debt collection practices by many debt collectors. Abusive debt collection practices contribute to the... More...   $1 (12-13-2023 - MA)