Billings, Montana personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs on a car wreck claim.

Montana follows the modified comparative fault theory. Under this theory, the amount of damages a plaintiff can recover is reduced by a percentage that reflects their own degree of fault – so long as the percentage doesn't exceed 50%.... More...   $1 (05-06-2024 - MT)

Missoula, Montana personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs on a car wreck claim.

Montana follows the modified comparative fault theory. Under this theory, the amount of damages a plaintiff can recover is reduced by a percentage that reflects their own degree of fault – so long as the percentage doesn't exceed 50%.... More...   $1 (05-06-2024 - MT)

Boise, Idaho personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto neligence theoires.

Idaho follows the modified comparative negligence rule. Under this rule, a plaintiff (the injured party) can only recover damages if their percentage of fault is less than 50%. If the plaintiff is found to be 50% or more responsible for the accident, they cannot recover damages.... More...   $1 (05-06-2024 - ID)

Rapid City, South Dakota personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

South Dakota permits a plaintiff to recover damages so long as their fault was “slight." Flipping this around, a defendant's fault must be “gross" (or great) for a defendant to be liable for a plaintiff's injuries. Lawyers call this “slight-gross negligence," and ... More...   $1 (05-02-2024 - SD)

Phoenix, Arizona personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

Arizona operates under a “comparative fault” rule, meaning that if someone is entirely to blame for the auto accident, they must take care of the resulting damages. In other words, liability for the crash falls on whoever caused it. But in some cases, it's not only one pers... More...   $0 (04-29-2024 - AZ)

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

Federal courts are courts of limited jurisdiction, meaning they can only hear cases authorized by the United States Constitution or federal statutes. The federal district court is the starting point for any case arising under federal statutes, the Constitution, or treaties.

Oklahoma... More...   $0 (04-29-2024 - OK)

Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

Colorado state law uses 50% modified comparative negligence. That means that if a driver is over 50% at fault for an accident, they give up their right to receive compensation for damages. Other states throughout the country have similar regulations in place regarding traffic accidents.
... More...   $0 (04-22-2024 - CO)

Albuquerque, New Mexico personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Eleventh Judicial District Court, D-1113-CV-22-00418, and was removed to federal court by Haryana Star, Inc. et al.

New Mexico follows the pure comparative negligence doctrine. This means that a victim may pursue compensation even if they w... More...   $1 (04-21-2024 - NM)

Salt Lake City, Utah personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the 3rd District, Salt Lake County, 220907, and was removed by Wright Tree Service.

Utah has a comparative negligence law in place that has a 50 percent fault bar. This means that if you are at least half at fault, you will not retain anything from... More...   $0 (04-19-2024 - UT)

Hammond, Indiana personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Porter Superior Court 2, 64D02-2212-CT-010418, and was removed to federal court by C.R. England, Inc. et al.

Indiana follows the rule of modified comparative fault, which is also used by 32 other states. Under Indiana law, you may recover... More...   $1 (04-18-2024 - IN)

Jackson, Mississippi personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court of Hinds County, Mississippi, 23-00337 and was removed to federal courts by Ronnie B. King. Jr. and Schneider National Carriers, Inc.

Mississippi has a pure comparative negligence system. This means that you can still r... More...   $0 (04-18-2024 - MS)

Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an auto negligence theory.

Oklahoma has a modified comparative negligence law. Under this rule, a car accident victim who shares the blame for a crash may recover compensation as long as they are not more at fault for the accident than the defendant. The accident victim's compensation is reduced bas... More...   $0 (04-17-2024 - OK)

Houston, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the 80th District Court of Harris County, TX, 22-13419, and was removed to federal court by Fedex.

Texas follows the modified comparative negligence rule, also known as the 51% Bar Rule. This means that if a plaintiff is found to be 50% or les... More...   $1 (04-17-2024 - TX)

Austin, Texas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the 126th District Court, Travis County, Texas, D-1-GN-23-000156, and was removed to federal court by The Lane Construction Corporation.

Texas follows the modified comparative negligence rule, also known as the 51% Bar Rule. This means that if ... More...   $1 (04-17-2024 - TX)

Las Cruces, New Mexico personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who used on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Fifth Judicial District Court, D-503-CV-23-00537, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

New Mexico is a pure comparative negligence state. That means that fault can be shared among drivers, with each driver being assigned a percen... More...   $0 (04-17-2024 - NM)

Brooklyn, New York personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

New York's contributory negligence law allows injured individuals to recover compensation for their injuries in proportion to the fault of others. Compensation is diminished by whatever percentage of fault is attributable to the injured party.

... More...   $0 (04-17-2024 - NY)

New Haven, Connecticut personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Connecticut is one of the many states that have comparative negligence laws. As long as an injured party was not more than 50 percent at fault, then he or she can file a personal injury suit against the parties responsible. This is considered a modified comparative law.
... More...   $1 (04-17-2024 - CT)

Charlotte, North Carolina personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Mecklenburg County Superior Court, 23-CVS-8020, and was removed to federal court by Archer-Daniels-Midland Company
also known as ADM Trucking, Inc.

The Plaintiff challenged the jurisdiction of the federal court and sought rema... More...   $0 (04-17-2024 - NC)

Asheville, North Carolina personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

North Carolina negligence laws follow the doctrine of pure contributory negligence, which bars recovery by the plaintiff if they're just partially at fault (even as little as 1%).... More...   $1 (04-17-2024 - NC)

Greensboro, North Carolina personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

North Carolina negligence laws follow the doctrine of pure contributory negligence, which bars recovery by the plaintiff if they're just partially at fault (even as little as 1%).... More...   $1 (04-17-2024 - NC)

Alexandra, Virginia personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Virginia uses the pure contributory negligence rule. This is the harshest legal doctrine in personal injury cases involving negligence. The defendant must be 100% at fault for the accident that caused the plaintiff's injuries.... More...   $0 (04-16-2024 - VA)

Roanoke, Virginia personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory claiming $350,000 in damages and/or injuries.

Virginia uses the pure contributory negligence rule. This is the harshest legal doctrine in personal injury cases involving negligence. The defendant must be 100% at fault for the accident that caused the plaintiff's injuries.

... More...   $0 (04-16-2024 - VA)