More...   $1 (02-03-2023 - TN)
										
 
									
								
							
								
									| 
										
Lorna Shields v. United of Omaha Insurance Company
									 | 
								
								
									| 
										
										 Portland, Oregon insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a violation of E.R.I.S.A. employment retirement theory. 
 
Defendant United of Omaha Life Insurance Company (hereinafter, "United") is licensed to conduct the business of insurance in the State of Maine. Prior to 2008, United issued a basic Group Term Life policy as well as a voluntary Group Term Life policy to 
										More...    $0 (03-16-2016 - ME)
										   
									 | 
								
							
								
									| 
										
Carol H. Stewart v. Harford Life and Accident Insurance Company
     
									 | 
								
								
									| 
										
										 Birmingham, Alabama insurance law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a breach of contract theory. 
 
Carol Stewart sued to obtain two insurance benefits that she 
believes Hartford Insurance Company owes her: (1) long-term dis- 
ability payments and (2) a waiver of life-insurance premiums. Alt- 
hough it concedes that Stewart was covered by its policy, Hartford
  
										More...    $0 (08-10-2022 - AL)
										   
									 | 
								
							
								
									| 
										
Walter Dean and Dean Wollenzien v. National Production Workers Union Severance Trust Plan, et al.
									 | 
								
								
									| 
										
										 Chicago, Illinois labor lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) violation theories. 
 
Walter Dean and Dean Wollenzien sued their former pension plans, the plans’ 
trustees, and the plans’ administrator for various claims un- 
der the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974— 
more commonly known as E 
										More...    $0 (08-15-2022 - IL)
										   
									 | 
								
							
								
									| 
										
Virgil Harris v. The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company, et al.
									 | 
								
								
									| 
										
										 Atlanta, Georgia insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on E.R.I.S.A. law theories. 
 
Under the Employment Retirement Income Security Act, 29 
U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), a plan administrator’s benefits decision is 
subject to plenary review in federal court unless the administrator 
is given discretion to determine eligibility or construe the terms of 
t 
										More...    $0 (07-29-2022 - GA)
										   
									 | 
								
							
								
									| 
										
Renee Ministeri v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Company
									 | 
								
								
									| 
										
										 Boston, Massachusetts insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a breach of insurance contract theory. 
 
It is common ground that 
ambiguities in an insurance policy — particularly ambiguities in 
an insurance policy issued as part of an employee benefit plan 
and, thus, within the protective carapace of the Employee 
Retirement Income Security Act of 1 
										More...    $0 (07-25-2022 - MA)
										   
									 | 
								
							
								
									| 
										
Sam Sobh v. Phoenix Graphix Incorporated
									 | 
								
								
									| 
										
										 Phoenix, Arizona employment law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant E.R.I.S.A. employment retirement law theory. 
 
 
Sobh was an employee of Defendant Phoenix Graphix Inc. for more than ten years. While in that job, Sobh participated in a Profit Sharing Plan (“Plan”). In 2018, Sobh left his job and began seeking distribution of his Plan benefits in the form of a “hard 
										More...    $0 (06-28-2022 - AZ)
										   
									 | 
								
							
								
									| 
										
Robert Baker v. Othon, Inc., et al.
									 | 
								
								
									| 
										
										 Houston, Texas personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of contract theory. 
 
This case was filed in the 215th Judicial District Court, Harris County, TX, 21-82987, and was removed to federal court by Defendant. 
 
 
Baker sued the defendants on December 22, 2021, in the 215th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas, alleging, among other  
										More...    $0 (06-24-2022 - TX)
										   
									 | 
								
							
								
									| 
										
Mary K. Boley v. University Health Services, Inc., et al.
									 | 
								
								
									| 
										
										 Philadelphia, Pennsylvania employment law lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) breach of fiduciary duty class action theory. 
 
Universal Health Services, Inc. sponsors the Universal 
Health Services, Inc., Retirement Savings Plan (the “Plan”), a 
defined contribution retirement plan,2 in which qualified
  
										More...    $0 (06-03-2022 - PA)
										   
									 | 
								
							
								
									| 
										
Corey Skelton v. Radisson Hotel Bloomington, et al.
									 | 
								
								
									| 
										
										 Minneapolis, Minnesota employment laws represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendants on an Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, 29 U.S.C. §§ 1001 et seq. theories. 
 
Corey Skelton was married to Beth M. Skelton (“Skelton”), a corporate group 
sales manager at Davidson Hotels LLC. 
 
Davidson operated a welfare benefits plan (“Plan”) that provided dental, 
heal 
										More...    $0 (05-06-2022 - MN)
										   
									 | 
								
							
								
									| 
										
SIS, LLC v. Stoneridge Software, Inc.
									 | 
								
								
									| 
										
										 Atlanta, Georgia civil litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiff, who sued the Defendant on a breach of contract theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages as a direct result of the breach. 
 
"SIS spent two years preparing and convincing APi that it was the right company to lead the project," said Davis. "Stoneridge stole the client by using information gained under a  
										More...    $0 (07-08-2021 - GA)
										   
									 | 
								
							
								
									| 
										
Ruth Mae Chelf v. Prudential Insurance Company of America
									 | 
								
								
									| 
										
										 Louisville, Kentucky insurance lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued defendant on a breach of fiduciary duty theory. 
 
Elmer Chelf, a former employee of Wal-Mart, was 
on long-term disability leave when he passed away. His widow, Ruth Mae Chelf, was denied 
benefits under his work-based optional term life insurance policy. She brought claims against 
Wal-Mart and the Plan Administ 
										More...    $0 (04-12-2022 - TN)
										   
									 | 
								
							
								
									| 
										
Fabian Thomas v. Denise Daniel
									 | 
								
								
									
										
										Fort Worth, TX - Divorce lawyer represented Appellee with a dispute over pension benefits. 
 
 
Thomas began working for the federal government in 1989. He and Daniel  
married in 2000. A divorce decree dissolved the marriage in September 2011. 
One of the assets divided in the decree was Thomas’s 
										More...   $0 (03-20-2022 - TX)
										   
									  | 
								
							
								
									| 
										
Horacio Eugenio Sobol v. Christine Marie Sobol 
									 | 
								
								
									
										
										  Richmond, VA - Divorce lawyer represented appellant with challenging the valuation and distribution of certain assets. 
 
 
The parties were married in August 1998 and separated approximately twenty years later, on  
July 1, 2018. Three children were born of the marriage.   
 
Wife had earned a 
										More...   $0 (03-12-2022 - VA)
										   
									  | 
								
															
									
									  Next Page
  
									 |