Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: CF.47.11-902.PM1, AGGRAVATED DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL AND/OR DRUG, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902.(D), Class: B3 Date of Offense: 04/25/2026 Party Name Disposition Information BENCE, MEGHAN NICOLE Disposed: DEFERRED, 06/08/2026. Guilty Plea Count as Disposed: AMENDED

Phoenix, Arizona, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with aggravated driving under the influence, a class 4 felony. Reported by: Kent Morlan On April 21, 2019, around 2:00 a.m., an officer noticed a car drifting from side to side on the road. While observing the

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer Brian Carrollrepresented the Defendant charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: CF.63.2-415,-416.C.4a, TRAFFICKING AMPHETAMINE OR METHAMPHETAMINE 20 GRAMS OR MORE, in violation of 63 O.S. 2-415.C.4a, Class: B3 Date of Offense: 02/10/2026 Party Name Disposition Informati

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer Carlos Williams represented the Defendant charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: CF.47.11-902.PM1, AGGRAVATED DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902.D, Class: B3 Date of Offense: 01/30/2026 Party Name Disposition Information SANDERS

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: CF.47.11-902.P1, AGGRAVATED DUI ALCOHOL, in violation of 47 O.S. 11-902.D, Class: B3 Date of Offense: 12/27/2025 Party Name Disposition Information Carrillo-jimenez, Luis D Disposed: DISMISSED, 06/03/2026. Dismissed- Request of the State Count as Disposed: AGGRAVATED DUI ALCOHOL(

Petitioner was tried for assault and attempted murder. The State sought to introduce a recorded statement that petitioner's wife Sylvia had made during police interrogation, as evidence that the stabbing was not in self-defense. Sylvia did not testify at trial because of Washington's marital privilege. Petitioner argued that admitting the evidence would violate his Sixth Amendment right to be "con

¶1 Michael David Randolph, Appellant, was tried by jury and found guilty in the District Court of Tulsa County, Case No. CF-2007-1661, of Count 1, trafficking in illegal drugs, after former conviction of two (2) or more felonies, in violation of 63 O.S.Supp.2004, § 2-415; Count 2, possession of marijuana, second offense, after former conviction of one (1) or more felonies, in violation of 63 O.

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyers represented the Defendants charged with: Count # 1. Count as Filed: CF.21.421, CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT A FELONY, in violation of 21 O.S. 421, Class: C2 Date of Offense: 04/29/2026 Party Name Disposition Information STINSON, AMANDA DAWN Disposed: DISMISSED, 06/02/2026. Dismissed- Request of the State Count as Disposed: CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT A FELONY

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with assault and batter with a dangerous weapon. Reported by Kent Morlan 21 O.S. 645 provides: Every person who, with intent to do bodily harm and without justifiable or excusable cause, commits any assault,

Kansas City, Missouri, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with three counts of child molestation in the first-degree. Reported by Kent Morlan The State charged O’Brien with three counts of the unclassified felony of first-degree statutory sodomy, two counts of

Beaumont, Texas, civil litigation lawyers represented the Plaintiff on a qui tam action claiming that the Defendants violated the False Claims Act (FCA) by causing the submission of false or invalid diagnosis codes to the Medicare Advantage program. Reported by Kent Morlan The United`

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer Kent Morlan represented the Defendant felony drug trafficking, possession of drug paraphrenalia, driving without a license, displaying an improper tag, speeding, and making an unsafe lane charge. 63 O.S. 415 (B) provides: B. Except as otherwise authorized by the Uniform Controlled Dangerous Substan

Stillwater, Oklahoma criminal Defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with domestic assault and battery, AFCF, in violation of 21 O.S. 644(j), which provides: J. Any person who commits any assault and battery by strangulation or attempted strangulation against an intimate partner or a family or household member as defined by Section 60.1 of Title 22 of the Oklahoma Statutes shall, upon

Stillwater, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the defendant charged with malicious injury to property in violation of 21 O.S.1760(2), which provides: A. Every person who maliciously injures, defaces or destroys any real or personal property not his or her own, in cases other than such as are specified in Section 1761 et seq. of this title, is guilty of: 1. A misdemeanor, if the da

Stillwater, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represents the Defendant charged with domestic assault and batter by strangulation in violation of 21 O.S. 644, which provides: A. Assault shall be punishable by imprisonment in a county jail not exceeding ninety (90) days, or by a fine not more than Five Hundred Dollars ($500.00), or by both such fine and imprisonment. B. Assault and battery shal

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer Michael French represented the Defendant charged with actual physical control while intoxicated in violation of 47 11-902, which provides: A. It is unlawful and punishable as provided for in this section for any person to drive, operate, or be in actua

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with assault and batter with a dangerous weapon in violation of 21 O.S.645, which provides: Every person who, with intent to do bodily harm and without justifiable or excusable cause, commits any assault, battery, or assault and battery upon the person of another with any sharp or dangerous weapon, or who, without such c

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with acquiring proceeds from drug activity in violation of 63 O.S. 2-503.1, which provides: A. It is unlawful for any person knowingly or intentionally to receive or acquire proceeds and to conceal such proceeds, or engage in transactions involving proceeds, known to be derived from any violation of the Uniform Controlled

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with cruelty to animals in violation of 21 O.S. 1685, which provides: Any person who shall willfully or maliciously torture, destroy or kill, or cruelly beat or injure, maim or mutilate any animal in subjugation or captivity, whether wild or tame, and whether belonging to the person or to another, or deprive any such an

Phoenix, Arizona, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with three counts of Organized Retail Theft, a Class Four Felony. Connor Burgess (DOB 12/1993), committed a series of retail thefts targeting sporting goods retailers across the valley, resulting in more than $26,000 in losses. In one incident, he stole seven golf clubs valued at more than $4,200 from a Dick’s Sportin

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with possession of a firearm while in the commission of a felony, possession of a controlled substance, and acquiring proceeds from drug activity. 21 O.S. 1287 provides: A. Any person who, while committing or attempting to commit a felony, possesses a pistol, shotgun or rifle or any other offensive weapon in such commi

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer Robbi Barker represented the Defendant charged with feloniously pointing a firearm, carrying a firearm while under the influence of drugs or alcohol, and actual physical control of a vehicle while intoxicated. 21 O.S. 1289.16 provides: A. It shall be lawful to point a firea

Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with assault and battery with a dangerous weapon and shooting with intent to kill. Reported by: Kent Morlan 21 O.S.. 652 (C) provides: C. Any person who commits any assault and battery upon another, including

Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with violation of a protective order -Subsequent Offense in violation of 22 O.S. 60.6: A. Except as otherwise provided by this section, any person who: 1. Has been served with an emergency temporary, ex parte or final protective order or foreign protective order and is in violation of such protective order, upon convic