Date: 03-24-2023

Case Style:

Joseph Katz and Chays Katz v. Cheskel Laudau, et al.

Case Number: 7:23-cv-00255

Judge: Nelson Stephen Roman

Court: United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Westchester County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:

Defendant's Attorney: Avraham Chaim Moskowitz

Description: White Plains, New York personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on racketeering theories.

18 U.S.C. 1962 provides:

(a) It shall be unlawful for any person who has received any income derived, directly or indirectly, from a pattern of racketeering activity or through collection of an unlawful debt in which such person has participated as a principal within the meaning of section 2, title 18, United States Code, to use or invest, directly or indirectly, any part of such income, or the proceeds of such income, in acquisition of any interest in, or the establishment or operation of, any enterprise which is engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce. A purchase of securities on the open market for purposes of investment, and without the intention of controlling or participating in the control of the issuer, or of assisting another to do so, shall not be unlawful under this subsection if the securities of the issuer held by the purchaser, the members of his immediate family, and his or their accomplices in any pattern or racketeering activity or the collection of an unlawful debt after such purchase do not amount in the aggregate to one percent of the outstanding securities of any one class, and do not confer, either in law or in fact, the power to elect one or more directors of the issuer.

(b) It shall be unlawful for any person through a pattern of racketeering activity or through collection of an unlawful debt to acquire or maintain, directly or indirectly, any interest in or control of any enterprise which is engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce.

(c) It shall be unlawful for any person employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt.

Outcome: 03/23/2023 ***NOTICE TO ATTORNEY REGARDING DEFICIENT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL. Notice to Attorney Scott Levenson. RE-FILE Document No. 40 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal,,,. The filing is deficient for the following reason(s): the individual filers were NOT selected for the voluntary dismissal;. Re-file the document using the event type Notice of Voluntary Dismissal found under the event list Notices - select the correct filer/filers - select the correct party/parties the voluntary dismissal is against - and attach the correct signed PDF. (nd) (Entered: 03/23/2023)
03/23/2023 41 NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice and without costs against the defendant(s) Congregation Atzei Chaim of Siget, Inc., Mendy Hirsch, Cheskel Landau, Etya Landau, Pro Med Staffing Resource, Inc., Yaakov Ber Teitelbaum. Document filed by Chaya Katz, Joseph Katz. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Levenson, Scott) (Entered: 03/23/2023)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments: