Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Date: 02-10-2023
Case Style:
Hannah D'Egidio and Tyler D'Egidio v. AIG Property Casualty Company
Case Number: 1:22-CV-03108
Judge: Michael E. Hegarty
Court: United States District Court for the District of Colorado (Denver County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Defendant's Attorney: Laurence Murray McHeffey and Kristi Lynn Blumhardt
Description: Denver, Colorado insurance law lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of contract theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of the wrongful breach.
25:2 ELEMENTS OF LIABILITY — FIRST-PARTY COMMON-LAW CLAIMS
For the plaintiff, (name), to recover from the defendant, (name), on (his) (her) (its)
claim of bad faith breach of insurance contract, you must find all the following have been
proved by a preponderance of the evidence:
1. The plaintiff had (injuries) (damages) (losses);
2. The defendant acted unreasonably in (insert appropriate description, e.g., “denying
payment of the plaintiff’s claim”);
3. The defendant knew that its (conduct) (position) was unreasonable or the
defendant recklessly disregarded the fact that (his) (her) (its) (conduct) (position) was
unreasonable; and
4. The defendant’s unreasonable (conduct) (position) was a cause of the plaintiff’s
(injuries) (damages) (losses).
If you find that any one or more of these (number) statements has not been proved,
then your verdict must be for the defendant.
On the other hand, if you find that all of these (number) statements have been
proved, (then your verdict must be for the plaintiff) (then you must consider the
defendant’s affirmative defense(s) of [insert any affirmative defense that would be a complete
defense to plaintiff’s claim]).
If you find that (this affirmative defense has) (any one or more of these affirmative
defenses have) been proved by a preponderance of the evidence, then your verdict must be
for the defendant.
However, if you find that (this affirmative defense has not) (none of these
affirmative defenses have) been proved, then your verdict must be for the plaintiff.
Outcome: 02/10/2023 18 STIPULATION of Dismissal of Case with prejudice by Plaintiffs Hannah D'Egidio, Tyler D'Egidio. (Furtado, David) (Entered: 02/10/2023)
02/10/2023 19 ORDER by Magistrate Judge Michael E. Hegarty on 10 February 2023. Before the Court is the parties' Stipulation for Dismissal With Prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) 18 . Therefore, this case was DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, with each party to bear its own fees and costs, upon the filing of the Stipulation. No order of dismissal is necessary. The Clerk of Court shall close this case. (cmadr, ) (Entered: 02/10/2023)
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: