Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 03-21-2023

Case Style:

Allan Pallarito v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company

Case Number: 1:20-cv-03041

Judge: R. Brooke Jackson

Court: United States District Court for the District of Colorado (Denver County)

Plaintiff's Attorney:






Click Here to Watch How To Find A Lawyer by Kent Morlan


Click Here For The Best Denver Insurance Law Lawyer Directory


If no lawyer is listed, call 918-582-6422 and MoreLaw will help you find a lawyer.




Defendant's Attorney: Lily E. Nierenberg, Sandy Marie Eloranto, Joseph Edward Okon

Description: Denver, Colorado insurance law lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract.





Federal Courthouse - Denver, Colorado


Federal Courthouse - Denver, Colorado


MoreLaw Legal News For Denver




25:2 ELEMENTS OF LIABILITY — FIRST-PARTY COMMON-LAW CLAIMS
For the plaintiff, (name), to recover from the defendant, (name), on (his) (her) (its)
claim of bad faith breach of insurance contract, you must find all the following have been
proved by a preponderance of the evidence:
1. The plaintiff had (injuries) (damages) (losses);
2. The defendant acted unreasonably in (insert appropriate description, e.g., “denying
payment of the plaintiff’s claim”);
3. The defendant knew that its (conduct) (position) was unreasonable or the
defendant recklessly disregarded the fact that (his) (her) (its) (conduct) (position) was
unreasonable; and
4. The defendant’s unreasonable (conduct) (position) was a cause of the plaintiff’s
(injuries) (damages) (losses).
If you find that any one or more of these (number) statements has not been proved,
then your verdict must be for the defendant.
On the other hand, if you find that all of these (number) statements have been
proved, (then your verdict must be for the plaintiff) (then you must consider the
defendant’s affirmative defense(s) of [insert any affirmative defense that would be a complete
defense to plaintiff’s claim]).
If you find that (this affirmative defense has) (any one or more of these affirmative
defenses have) been proved by a preponderance of the evidence, then your verdict must be
for the defendant.
However, if you find that (this affirmative defense has not) (none of these
affirmative defenses have) been proved, then your verdict must be for the plaintif

Outcome: Settled and dismissed with prejudice.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: