Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Date: 01-03-2023
Case Style:
Jordan Carlton, et al. v. Avis Budget Group, Inc., et al.
Case Number: 1:19-cv-458
Judge: Jill A. Otake
Court: United States District Court for the District of Hawaii (Honolulu County)
Plaintiff's Attorney:
Defendant's Attorney: James P. Feeney, Kennth K. Fukonaga, Ian E. Edwards for Avis Budget
Description: Honolulu, Hawaii personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiffs, who sued Defendants on a product liability theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of a defective and unreasonably dangerous produce designed, manufactured, sold or rent by Defendants.
The claims made and defenses asserted by the parties are not available.
"To do this the victim must demonstrate that there was either a design defect or there was a manufacturing defect which caused the product to malfunction. In other cases the victim may be able to prove that the designer or manufacturer failed to warn of the potential danger of the product. To prove the product is defective the consumer must show that the product failed to work properly when used for its intended use or in a reasonably foreseeable manner. This failure to work properly must be the cause of the injuries." Turbin Chu Heidt
Outcome: Settled and dismissed with prejudice.
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: