Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 01-13-2023

Case Style:

Under Armour, Inc. v. Armorina, Inc.

Case Number: 1:19-cv-02417

Judge: Deborah L. Boardman

Court: United States District Court for the District of Maryland (Baltimore County)

Plaintiff's Attorney: Doug Rettew

Defendant's Attorney: Christopher J. Lyon, J. Stephen Simms, Joseph D. Allen

Description: Baltimore, Maryland intellectual property lawyers represented Plaintiff, which sued Defendant on a trademark infringement theory under 15 U.S.C. 1051.




MoreLaw Legal News For Baltimore





How are trademarks enforced? Trademarks are enforced through cease and desist letters. Sending a cease and desist letter to the address of the infringer is usually the first course of action. In many cases, a cease and desist letter will be enough to persuade an infringer to leave your mark alone.

See: https://www.redpoints.com/blog/trademark-enforcement/

Outcome: 01/13/2023 115  JUDGMENT in favor of Under Armour, Inc. against Armorina Inc.. Signed by Judge Deborah L. Boardman on 1/13/2023. (kk5s, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 01/13/2023)
01/13/2023 120  COURT'S TRIAL EXHIBIT LIST. (kk5s, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 01/13/2023)
01/13/2023 121  Jury Notes. (kk5s, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 01/13/2023)
01/13/2023 122  JURY VERDICT. (kk5s, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 01/13/2023)
01/13/2023 123  -SEALED- JURY VERDICT Signed. (kk5s, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 01/13/2023)

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer
Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case
Subject:
County:
State: