M ORE L AW
LEXAPEDIA
Salus Populi Suprema Lex Esto

Information
About MoreLaw
Contact MoreLaw

Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 02-11-2019

Case Style:

JOHNATHAN OSHAUN GOULD vs STATE OF FLORIDA

Case Number: 17-2595

Judge: F. Rand Wallis

Court: DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT

Plaintiff's Attorney: Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Kellie A. Nielan, Assistant Attorney General

Defendant's Attorney: James S. Purdy, Public Defender, and Ailene S. Rogers, Assistant Public Defender

Description:





At the sentencing hearing, in response to Gould's ore tenus motion to withdraw his
previously entered guilty plea, the trial court asked if Gould had filed a written motion.
When Gould explained that he had not, the trial court denied the motion and instructed
Gould to file a written motion at an appropriate time.
As we explained in McInturff v. State, 111 So. 3d 296, 297 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013),
"there is no requirement that a motion to withdraw a guilty plea be in writing," and a motion
raised at a sentencing hearing, but prior to the imposition of sentence, is a timely Florida
Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.170(f) motion. Based on the record, the trial court, like the
court in McInturff, denied the motion because it was not written. See id. This was
reversible error because a written motion was not required, and the trial court should have
given Gould an opportunity to be heard on his motion. See id.; see also Lehmkuhle v.
State, 20 So. 3d 971, 974 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) ("The trial court here should have given
Lehmkuhle an opportunity to be heard before ruling on his motion."); Morales v. State,
973 So. 2d 679, 681 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008) (holding that defendant who orally moved to
withdraw plea at beginning of sentencing should have been given opportunity to present
argument and be heard on his motion to withdraw plea before sentencing).

Outcome: Accordingly, we reverse and remand the case to the trial court to hold a hearing on Gould's motion.

REVERSED

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



 
 
Home | Add Attorney | Add Expert | Add Court Reporter | Sign In
Find-A-Lawyer By City | Find-A-Lawyer By State and City | Articles | Recent Lawyer Listings
Verdict Corrections | Link Errors | Advertising | Editor | Privacy Statement
© 1996-2019 MoreLaw, Inc. - All rights reserved.