Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Date: 06-28-2018
Case Style:
Northern District of Iowa Federal Courthouse - Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Morelaw Internet Marketing
Case Number: 16-cv-3016-MWB
Judge: Mark W. Bennett
Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of Iowa (Linn County)
Plaintiff's Attorney: Ward Rouse for Laura McGraw
Jacob A. Schunk for the United States of America
Defendant's Attorney: No Appearance
Description: Cedar Rapids, IA - Nationwide Wound Services Provider Agrees to Pay Nearly $400,000 to Resolve False Claims Act Allegations
Healogics, Inc., a Florida-based provider of wound care services with clinics across the country, agreed to pay $398,162.69 to resolve False Claims Act allegations pertaining to improper coding. Specifically, the United States alleged that, from January 1, 2012, through June 30, 2017, Healogics submitted claims to Medicare, Medicaid, and Tricare using Modifier 25 to signify that a separate evaluation and management service was performed on the same date as another procedure when no such separate service was performed.
Because a private citizen filed a qui tam, or whistleblower, lawsuit raising the civil allegations, Healogics agreed to pay the citizen’s law firm an additional $48,694.37 in fees. That private citizen is also entitled to receive $91,577.42 of the recovery pursuant to the qui tam provisions of the False Claims Act. Those provisions permit private individuals with knowledge of wrongdoing to bring suit on behalf of the government for false claims and share in any recovery.
“This is yet another example of our office’s commitment to ensuring taxpayer money is well spent and health care providers play on a level playing field,” said United States Attorney Peter E. Deegan, Jr. “We encourage citizens with knowledge of wrongdoing by health care providers to bring those matters to our office’s attention.”
The case was investigated by the Department of Health and Human Services Office of Inspector General.
(Qui Tam)
Outcome: Settled for $398,162
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: