Salus Populi Suprema Lex Esto

About MoreLaw
Contact MoreLaw

Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 07-12-2018

Case Style:

Steven Derek Phiffer v. The State of Texas

Case Number: 11-17-00210-CR

Judge: PER CURIAM Panel consists of: Willson, J., Bailey, J., and Wright, S.C.J.

Court: Eleventh Court of Appeals

Plaintiff's Attorney: Carolyn D. Thurmond, Assistant
Laura Nodolf, District Attorney
Whitney Griffith, Assistant

Defendant's Attorney: Uknown

Description: We previously abated this appeal for the trial court to determine whether Appellant desired to prosecute this appeal and, if so, whether Appellant had made any arrangements for filing the brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 38.8(b). In compliance with this court’s order, the trial court held a hearing. Appellant did not appear at the hearing, but the record from that hearing shows that he had gone to the trial court clerk’s office and paid his fine and court costs in full. The trial court surmised that Appellant had “decided to not continue with his appeal.” Because Appellant is not indigent and because Appellant did not file a brief or make arrangements to pay for the reporter’s record, this appeal has been submitted on the clerk’s record—without a reporter’s record from the jury trial and without an appellant’s brief. See TEX. R. APP. P. 37.3(c), 38.8(b)(4). We have reviewed the clerk’s record and the reporter’s record from the hearing that was conducted pursuant to Rule 38.8(b), and we have found no reversible error.

Outcome: Consequently, we affirm the judgment of the trial court.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:


Home | Add Attorney | Add Expert | Add Court Reporter | Sign In
Find-A-Lawyer By City | Find-A-Lawyer By State and City | Articles | Recent Lawyer Listings
Verdict Corrections | Link Errors | Advertising | Editor | Privacy Statement
© 1996-2018 MoreLaw, Inc. - All rights reserved.