Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.
Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw
Date: 03-22-2020
Case Style:
Bronson Williams v. The State of Texas
Case Number: 09-19-00265-CR
Judge: STEVE McKEITHEN
Court: Court of Appeals
Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont
Plaintiff's Attorney: Wayln G. Thompson
Defendant's Attorney:
Need help finding a lawyer to appeal a conviction for aggravated robbery in Texas?
Call 918-582-6422. It's Free.
Description:
MoreLaw ReceptionistsVOIP Phone and Virtual Receptionist Services
Call 918-582-6422 Today
Pursuant to a plea bargain agreement, appellant Bronson Williams pleaded
guilty to aggravated robbery. The trial court found the evidence sufficient to find
Williams guilty, but deferred further proceedings, placed Williams on community
supervision for ten years, and assessed a fine of $500. The State subsequently filed
a motion to revoke Williams’s unadjudicated community supervision. Williams
pleaded “true” to eight violations of the terms of his community supervision. The
2
trial court found that Williams had violated the conditions of his community
supervision, found Williams guilty of aggravated robbery, and assessed punishment
at fifty years of confinement.
Williams’s appellate counsel filed a brief that presents counsel’s professional
evaluation of the record and concludes the appeal is frivolous. See Anders v.
California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967); High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex. Crim. App.
1978). On September 10, 2019, we granted an extension of time for Williams to file
a pro se brief. We received no response from Williams. We have reviewed the
appellate record, and we agree with counsel’s conclusion that no arguable issues
support an appeal. Therefore, we find it unnecessary to order appointment of new
counsel to re-brief the appeal. Cf. Stafford v. State, 813 S.W.2d 503, 511 (Tex. Crim.
App. 1991).
Outcome: We affirm the trial court’s judgment.1
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: