Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 12-27-2020

Case Style:

In re James Myart

Case Number: 04-20-00593-CR

Judge: PER CURIAM Sitting: Luz Elena Chapa, Justice Beth Watkins, Justice Liza A. Rodriguez, Justice

Court: Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas

Plaintiff's Attorney: Joe D. Gonzales

Defendant's Attorney:


Free National Lawyer Directory


OR


Just Call 855-853-4800 for Free Help Finding a Lawyer Help You.



Description:

San Antonio, Texas - Criminal Lawyer petition for a writ of mandamus.



Relator James Myart filed a pro se petition for a writ of mandamus in which he asks this
court to order the trial court to set a bond or release relator pending a hearing on the State’s motion
to adjudicate guilt. Myart is represented by counsel in the trial court; therefore, he is not entitled
to hybrid representation. Patrick v. State, 906 S.W.2d 481, 498 (Tex. Crim. App. 1995). The
absence of a right to hybrid representation means relator’s pro se mandamus petition will be treated
as presenting nothing for this court’s review. See id.; see also Gray v. Shipley, 877 S.W.2d 806,
806 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 1994, orig. proceeding).

Outcome: Accordingly, relator’s petition for a writ of mandamus is denied.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: