|
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on wrongful failure to pay E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits pursuant to 29 U.S.C. 1132. |
|
Muskogee, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a 42 U.S.C. 2000e Job Discrimination (Employment)theory.... More... $0 (02-26-2024 - OK) |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on 42 U.S.C. 2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) theories. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a wrongful denial of E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits benefits theory. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Family and Medical Leave Act employment discrimination theory. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers presented the Plaintiff who sued on a 42:2000 Job Discrimination (Race) theory. |
|
San Diego, California employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA) violation theory. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented the Defendant who sued on a job discrimination theory. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma, criminal law lawyer represented the Defendant, charged with failure to register as a sex offender in violation of 57 O.S. 582, which provides: |
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on Fair Labor Standards Act violation theories. |
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an Americans with Disability Act Violation theory. |
|
Oklahoma city, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) violation theory. |
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Fair Labor Standards Act violation theory. |
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on claiming Defendant violated the Fair Labor Standards Act and Oklahoma's Protection of Labor Act by failing to pay for all hours worked, failing to properly pay for overtime, and failing to maintain and preserve accurate records of hours worked by employees. Plaintiff seeks to represent other employ... More... $1 (12-29-2023 - OK) |
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits law theory. |
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma employment law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a Fair Labor Standards Act violation theory. |
|
Muskogee, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers presented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on an employment discrmination theory. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma employment law lawyers presented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a wrongful failure to pay E.R.I.S.A. benefits. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment) theories under 42 U.S.C. 2000e et seq., which make it unlawful for a private employer or a state or local government “to fail or refuse to hire or to discharge any individual, or otherwise to discriminate against any individual with respect to his compensation, terms, ... More... $1 (01-02-2024 - OK) |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff sued the Defendants on civil rights violation theories under 42 U.S.C. 1983. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on an employment discrimination theory under 42 U.S.C. 2000e which deals with employment discrimination law in the United States. It's also known as Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. To give you the most accurate information, I need some context about what specific aspect of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e you're in... More... $0 (12-27-2023 - OK) |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a job discrimination (age) civil rights violation theory.... More... $0 (12-04-2023 - OK) |
|
Stilwell, Oklahoma employment law lawyer represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on wrongful termination theories.... More... $1 (11-14-2023 - OK) |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with transportation of illegal aliens in violation of 8 USC 1324(a)(1)(A)(ii) and (a)(1)(B)(ii), which provide: |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendants on 42:2000e Job Discrimination (Employment) theories. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma pro se Plaintiff without a lawyer representing her sued the Defendant on a civil rights violation theory. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal law lawyer represented the Defendant, charged with: |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal law lawyer represented the Defendant, charged with failure to register as a sex offender in violation of 57 O.S. 583, which provides: |
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma employment lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on an Americans with Disabilities Act violation theory. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma employment law lawyers represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendant on Fair Labor Standards Act violation theories. |
|
Muskogee, Oklahoma employment law lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a Fair Labor Standards Act violation theory. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on auto negligence theories. |
|
Norman, Oklahoma plaintiff personal injury car wreck lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on an auto negligence theory. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma consumer credit lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on Fair Credit Reporting Act theories. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with bank fraud and failure to account for and pay over withholding and FICA (Social Security) taxes. |
|
Muskogee, Oklahoma civil rights lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury truck wreck lawyer sued Defendants on auto negligence and medical malpractice theories. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma civil litigation lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on (1) civil conspiracy; (2) unjust enrichment; (3) negligence; (4) negligent supervision; and (5) constructive trust. |
|
Akron, Ohio employment law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a Family Medical Leave Act violation theory. |
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma civil rights lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a job discrimination theory under 42 U.S.C. 2000e. |