Workers Compensation Law
 
Ronald Pour, Sr. v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

Minneapolis, Minnesota insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

604.18 INSURANCE STANDARD OF CONDUCT.
Subdivision 1.Terms.

For purposes of this section, the following terms have the meanings given them.

(a) "Insurance policy" means a written agreement between an insured and an insurer that obligates... More...
   $0 (03-24-2024 - MN)

Kathlene Bell and Michael Bell v. Ashley L. Griswold, Werner Enterprises, Inc., and Platform Science, Inc.

Kansas City, Kansas personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

Kansas follows the comparative negligence rule. This rule means that if you are found to have contributed to causing the accident in which you were injured, your compensation will be reduced by your percentage of fault.

... More...
   $1 (03-22-2024 - KS)

Michael Griffith, Sr., et al. v. Steffan Viernes, et al.

Sacramento, California personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence theory.


Under this law, the amount of compensation an injured party can receive is determined by their level of fault in relation to the accident. For example, if a court determines that the injured party is 20% at fault, their total damages award will be reduced by 20%.... More...
   $0 (03-22-2024 - CA)

Natasha K. Dominguez v. Landstar Systems, Inc., et al.

Las Vegas, Nevada personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the District Court, Clark County, Nevada, A-22-855311-C, and was removed to federal court by Landstar System, Inc. et al.

Under Nevada law, a car accident victim can only recover damages if their percentage of fault is less than 50%. If a v... More...
   $0 (03-21-2024 - NV)

Rhoddy Dance v. Sharkey Transportation, Inc.

Indianapolis, Indiana personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Marion Superior Court 2, 49D02-2110-CT-036154, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Indiana follows the rule of modified comparative fault, which is also used by 32 other states. Under Indiana law, you may recover dam... More...
   $1 (03-20-2024 - IN)

Krista Lane Kimelton v. Tribe Express, Inc., et al.

Tampa, Florida personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court, Polk County, Florida, 2023-CA-0017894, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Florida operates under a legal doctrine of “pure comparative negligence.” Under this doctrine, a driver's percentage of fault will determin... More...
   $1 (03-19-2024 - FL)

Larissa Araujo, et al. v. Coachella Valley Water District, et al.

San Diego, California personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

Comparative Negligence in California Under this law, the amount of compensation an injured party can receive is determined by their level of fault in relation to the accident. For example, if a court determines that the injured party is 20% at fault, their total damages award will... More...
   $1 (03-18-2024 - CA)

Randy Moore v. Anchor Glass Acquisition Corp.

Binghamton, New York personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a negligence theory.

New York's contributory negligence law allows injured individuals to recover compensation for their injuries in proportion to the fault of others. Compensation is diminished by whatever percentage of fault is attributable to the injured party.

... More...
   $1 (03-17-2024 - NY)

United States of America v. Christina Iannelli

Boston, Massachusetts criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Fraud Charges.


Sudbury Bookkeeper Sentenced to Two Years in Prison for Fraud Charges



A former bookkeeper for a Lexington interior design firm was sentenced to two years in pri... More...
   $0 (03-17-2024 - MA)

Dale Snyder, et al. v. Enterprise Rent-A-Car Company et al

San Francisco, California personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued the Defendants on auto negligence theories.

On August 18, 2002, Marc Holland ("Holland") rented a 2002 Ford Escort from ERAC-SF. ( See Duley Decl., filed October 22, 2004, Ex. 5; Watt Decl., filed November 5, 2004, Ex. B.) At the time Holland rented the subject vehicle, his driver's license was suspended... More...
   $1 (03-15-2024 - CA)

Bobbieanne Molden v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al.

Kansas City, Missouri personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, 2316-CV23414, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Missouri follows a comparative negligence principle which means even if you're partially at fault for an accident, you can still receive... More...
   $1 (03-15-2024 - MO)

Antwanette Conway v. Bryson Schrock and Door Dash, Inc.

South Bend, Indiana personal injury car wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Indiana follows the rule of modified comparative fault, which is also used by 32 other states. Under Indiana law, you may recover damages as long as you are not more than 50 percent responsible for the accident. However, your percentage of fault will reduce the amount of c... More...
   $1 (03-15-2024 - IN)

Josh Burgie v. Walmart, Inc.

Paducah, Kentucky personal injury slip and fall lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Graves Circuit Court, 20-CI-00174, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

If you are a visitor to a person's home or apartment, property, or business, and are injured as a result of a dangerous condition or haz... More...
   $1 (03-14-2024 - IL)

United States of America v. Sakiru Olanrewaju Ambali

Tacoma, Washington criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with fraud on COVID relief programs.


Canadian resident sentenced to 3+ years in prison for more than $1 million fraud on COVID relief programs



A 45-year-old Nigerian citizen who defraud... More...
   $0 (03-14-2024 - WA)

Cynthia Helder Gary v. Kwik Trip, Inc.

Minneapolis, Minnesota personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

Minnesota follows the “comparative negligence” rule. Under this system, a plaintiff's compensation can be reduced by a percentage that equals their share of fault in causing the accident. If a plaintiff is found to be more than 50% at fault, they are barred from recovering d... More...
   $0 (03-12-2024 - WI)

Hillary Luke Hapel v. Pull-A-Part of Louisville, LLC

Louisville, Kentucky personal injury lawyer presented the Plaintiff who sued on a premises liability negligence theory.

This case was filing in the Jefferson Circuit Court, 22-CI-004113, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.

If you are a visitor to a person's home or apartment, property, or business, and are injured as a result of a dangerous condition or hazard, you... More...
   $0 (03-12-2024 - KY)

Tracey Bokkes v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada

Minneapolis, Minnesota insurance law lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a bad faith breach of insurance contract theory.

604.18 INSURANCE STANDARD OF CONDUCT.
Subdivision 1.Terms.

For purposes of this section, the following terms have the meanings given them.

(a) "Insurance policy" means a written agreement between an insured and an insurer t... More...
   $1 (03-11-2024 - MN)

United States of America v. Abraham Kiswani

Chicago, Illinois criminal defense lawyer represented the Defendant charged with Evading $3.7 Million in Income Taxes.


Suburban Chicago Businessman Sentenced to Two Years in Prison for Evading $3.7 Million in Income Taxes



A suburban Chicago businessman has been... More...
   $0 (03-11-2024 - IL)

Joanna Quarles Matlock v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, et al.

Paducah, Kentucky insurance law lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued on a bad faith breach of contract theory.

This case was filed in the Christian Circuit Court, 22-CI-00820, and was removed to federal court.

"Insurers are required to honor the terms of the insurance policy and handle claims fairly and timely. However, many insurance companies will use tactics designed to d... More...
   $1 (03-08-2024 - KY)

Carlos R. Rangel v. Gary White

Hot Springs, Arkansas personal injury lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

Arkansas is a modified comparative fault state. This means that if a victim is found to be 50% at fault for their injuries, they will be barred from recovering compensation of any kind. Multiple parties can have acted negligently, contributing to a victim's injuries, incl... More...
   $248000 (03-07-2024 - AR)

Mena Lucas v. Larry Taylor, et al.

St. Louis, Missouri personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on an auto negligence theory.

This case was filed in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, 23SL-CC02908, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Missouri follows a comparative negligence principle which means even if you're partially at fault for an accident, you can still re... More...
   $1 (03-05-2024 - MO)

Courtney Coulon, et al. v. Rasier, LLC, et al.

Washington, DC personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiffs who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Superior Court for the District of Columbia, 2022 CA 000031 V, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Unlike most states, Washington D.C. is a contributory negligence state. Under contributory negligence rules, victims cannot ... More...
   $1 (03-05-2024 - DC)

Michael Eden, et al.v. Joseph Car Transport, LLC, et al.

Bluefield, West Virginia personal injury lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a negligence theory.

The elements of a personal injury claim in West Virginia are: Duty of care, breach of duty of care, damages and a direct casual relationship between the two.

West Virginia is a modified comparative negligence state. Plaintiffs can be no more than 50% responsibl... More...
   $0 (03-05-2024 - VA)

Wendy Ratchford v. Manpreet Singh and Punj Aab Trucking, Inc.

Scranton, Pennsylvania personal injury truck wreck lawyers represented the Plaintiff who sued on auto negligence theories.

This case was filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County, 24-CV-736, and was removed to federal court by the Defendants.

Pennsylvania follows a 51 percent comparative negligence rule, which means you can recover damages if you were less than 51 p... More...
   $1 (03-05-2024 - PA)

Tawfik Atik v. Talisha Thomas and Rapid Transport, Inc.

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania personal injury truck wreck lawyer represented the Plaintiff who sued the Defendant on a auto negligence theory.

Pennsylvania follows a 51 percent comparative negligence rule, which means you can recover damages if you were less than 51 percent at fault. If you are found to carry more than 50 percent of the fault for the accident, you will be unable to seek compen... More...
   $0 (03-05-2024 - PA)

Next Page

Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: