| Warranty Law |
| |
|
John Edward Boileau, Jr. and Angela Gail Boileau v. Robalo Boats LLC and Action Boat Center, LLC
|
|
Houston, Texas consumer law lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on a Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act theory under 15 U.S.C. 2301.
... More... $0 (06-14-2023 - TX)
|
|
Deborah Brown v. Coty, Inc.
|
|
New York, New York personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a product liability theory.
Plaintiff, Deborah Brown, brings this putative class action against Defendant, Coty, Inc. (“Coty”), alleging violations of the New York Consumer Law for Deceptive Acts and Practices, N.Y. Gen. Bus. Law §§ 349 and 350, breach of an express warranty, breach of an impl... More... $0 (06-14-2023 - )
|
|
Clayton Warmoth v. Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Minimed, Inc.
|
|
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on product liability theories.
This diversity jurisdiction action involved claims for strict product liability, negligence, breach of express warranty, and breach of implied warranty associated with two medical devices manufactured by Defendants and used together to treat diabetes: the Medtronic... More... $0 (06-09-2023 - OK)
|
|
Aaron Stinson v. Davol, Inc., et al.
|
|
Columbus, Ohio personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on product liability theories.
Plaintiff Aaron Stinson and Defendants C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc. filed various MILs to exclude evidence in this case. Now before the Court are (A) Plaintiff's MIL No. 2 to Exclude Evidence or Argument Concerning the Reason for Warnings on Any Material Safety Data Sheet... More... $0 (06-06-2023 - OH)
|
|
Jose Solo v. General Motors, LLC
|
|
Austin, Texas consumer law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act theory.
The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act (MMWA) is a federal law that governs consumer product warranties in the United States. The law was enacted in 1975 to protect consumers from unfair or deceptive warranty practices.
The MMWA applies to written warranties that are offered... More... $0 (06-02-2023 - TX)
|
|
Cheyenne Lemke-Vega v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC
|
|
Oakland, California consumer law lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued defendants on breach of contract theory.
The complaint contains the following allegations.[1] On July 18, 2022, Lemke-Vega purchased a used 2019 Mercedes-Benz A220 (“the vehicle”) from Mercedes-Benz of Walnut Creek, an MBUSA-authorized dealership and repair facility. Compl. ¶¶ 8, 17. The total sale price w... More... $0 (05-22-2023 - CA)
|
|
Joshua Bell v. Annie's Inc.
|
|
St. Louis, Missouri consumer fraud lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on violation of the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act along with other Missouri statutory and common law claims.
Defendant manufactures, packages, distributes, and sells organic Tropical Treat Bunny Fruit Snacks (the “fruit snacks”). Defendant packages and sells them in an opaque, “heavy cardboard... More... $0 (05-18-2023 - MO)
|
|
Alyssa Aguila v. Planned Parenthood of Utah and Adriana Rodriguez Navarro
|
|
Salt Lake City, Utah personal injury lawyer sued Defendants on negligence and breach of fiduciary theories claiming that Navarro-a medical assistant at Planned Parenthood-had publicized Aguila's private health information and that Planned Parenthood was vicariously liable for Navarro's actions. Aguila also made direct claims against Planned Parenthood for negligent hiring, training, and supervisio... More... $0 (05-11-2023 - Ut)
|
|
Rilla Jefferson v. General Motors, LLC
|
|
Memphis, Tennessee personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a breach of an express warranty theory.
Plaintiff claimed that he purchased a new GMC Acadia from Defendant for $30,2709 in 2017.
Plaintiff alleges that she began to experience a Shift-to-Park (“STP”) defect shortly after she purchased the subject vehicle. (ECF No. 75-2 ¶ 12; ECF No. 79-1... More... $0 (05-11-2023 - TN)
|
|
United States of America v. Dhirendra Prasad
|
|
San Jose, California criminal defense lawyer represented Defendant charged with conspiring to defraud Apple, Inc., of millions of dollars and for related tax crimes.
Dhirendra Prasad, age 55, from Mountain House in San Joaquin County, was charged by Information with one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and wire fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1349 (Count One); two counts of co... More... $0 (04-29-2023 - CA)
|
|
Linda Williams v. Dollar General Corporation
|
|
Montgomery, Alabama personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a premises liability negligence theory.
This case was filed in the Circuit Court of Barbour County, Alabama, 69-CV-22-900051.00, and was removed to federal court by Defendant.
On September 30, 2022, Plaintiff Linda Williams (“Williams”) filed this class action complaint in Barbour County, A... More... $0 (04-19-2023 - AL)
|
|
Alma Suarez and Donald Suarez v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.
|
|
East St. Louis, Illinois personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiffs who sued Defendants on product liability theories.
Abbot Laboratories manufactures and sells cardiovascular, diabetes care, medical diagnostic, neuromodulation, nutrition products and medicines.
"Product liability law in Illinois is a complex area of law that governs the liability of manufacturers, sellers, an... More... $0 (04-18-2023 - IL)
|
|
John Davis v. Hart Consumer Products, Inc.
|
|
Dallas, Texas personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on product liability theories.
Allegation in a petition or complaint that a produce is defective and unreasonably dangerous are not proof of defect.
Hart Consumer Products Inc. sells battery powered lawn, garden and hand tools.
Techtronic Cordless GP and Techtronic Industries North America, In... More... $0 (04-14-2023 - TX)
|
|
Ronald Wayne Spence, Jr. v. Harbor Freight Tools USA, Inc.
|
|
Roanoke, Virginia personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a product liability theory.
"Product liability law in Virginia is a complex area of law that deals with the legal responsibility of manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers for defective products that injure those using the products after they enter the marketplace.
There are three main theories... More... $1 (04-13-2023 - VA)
|
|
Robert Harris v. C.R. Bard, Inc.
|
|
Cincinnati, Ohio personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on product liability theories.
Plaintiff brought this action for personal injuries suffered by him after being implanted with an Inferior Vena Cava )"IVC" filter medical device manufactured by Bard.
C. R. Bard, Inc. is a leading multinational developer, manufacturer, and marketer of innovative, life... More... $1 (04-05-2023 - OH)
|
|
Ryan Miller v. Titan Tire Corporation of Freeport
|
|
Fort Smith, Arkansas personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a product liability theory.
This case was filed in the Circuit Court of Sebastian County, 66FCV-21-00461, and was removed to federal court by the Defendant.
In Arkansas, a product liability action may be based on negligence or strict liability and may include claims of design defect; manufactu... More... $0 (03-27-2023 - AR)
|
|
Marcie Faye Haslett v. Keirton, Inc.
|
|
Denver, Colorado personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a product liability property damage theory
Federal Courthouse - Denver, Colorado
More... $1 (03-21-2023 - CO)
|
Elie D. Greene v. Aurobindo Pharma USA, Inc.
|
|
Camden, New Jersey personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendant on a product liability theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a defective and unreasonably dangerous produce designed, manufactured and/or sold by Defendant.
 More... $0 (03-02-2023 - NJ)
|
Daniel McDonald v. Southwest Auto Sales and Finance LLC, et al.
|
|
Phoenix, Arizona consumer law lawyer represented Plaintiff who sued Defendants on a Federal Odometer Act violation theory under 49 U.S.C. 32710
Federal Courthouse - Phoenix, Arizona
More... $1 (02-17-2023 - AZ)
|
David Osburn v. Ardmore Suzuki, Inc., d/b/a Jones Power Sports
|
|
Muskogee, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff who sued defendant on a product liability theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages as a direct result of a defective and unreasonably dangerous product designed, manufactured and/or sold by Defendant.
This was a products liability case wherein Plaintiff, a resident of Gun Barrel City, Texas, alleges he w... More... $0 (02-10-2023 - OK)
|
|
Benjamin Jordan v. Hisun Motors Corp., U.S.A.
|
|
Chattanooga consumer law lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act violation theory.
Federal Courthouse - Chattanooga, Tennessee
More... $1 (02-03-2023 - TN)
|
LaDonna S. Cade and John Cade v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp., et al.
|
|
Tulsa, Oklahoma personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiffs on negligence, breach of warranty and product liability theories claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a total knee replacement that was defective and unreasonably dangerous.
 More... $0 (01-05-2023 - OK)
|
Courtney Kunysz v. Merck & Co., Inc.
|
|
Charlotte, North Carolina personal injury lawyer represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a product liability theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in damages and/or injuries as a direct result of a defective and unreasonably dangerous product designed, manufactured and/or sold by Defendant. This case apparently related to Gardasil which is an HPV caccine for use in the preventio... More... $0 (01-05-2023 - )
|
|
Lazy S Ranch Properties, LLC v. Valero Terminaling and Distribution, et al.
|
|
Muskogee, Oklahoma personal injury lawyers represented Plaintiff, who sued Defendant on a negligence damage to property theory claiming to have suffered more than $75,000 in injuries and/or damages as a direct result of failure to exercise due care and as a direct result Plaintiff's property was damaged.
More... $0 (12-07-2022 - OK)
|
CMST Development, LLC v. City of Austin
|
Austin, Texas – Real Estate lawyer represented Appellant with suing the City of Austin for development of a one-acre tract of land.
On March 10, 1960, H. E. Eubank filed with the City an application for a
preliminary plan—an initial step in platting a subdivision—for a subdivision called “Eubank
Acres S... More... $0 (12-03-2022 - TX)
|
Next Page
|
 Kent Morlan, Esq.
Editor & Publisher
|
|
|
|
|
|