The plaintiffs, Garry, Carole, and Brian Slife (the Slifes), operate Pleasant Valley Dairy in Buchanan County. For several years, they purchased insurance from Central Iowa Mutual Insurance Association (CIMIA). Each year, they renewed their policy for a one-year duration. In 2011, CIMIA merged with and now does business as Farmers Mutual Hail Insurance Company (Farmers Mutual).

On November

Allan LeGrand appeals from a decree dissolving his marriage to Connie LeGrand. Allan argues the district court erred by giving joint legal custody to both parties but physical care to Connie. He also contends the district court erred in calculating his child support obligation and in ordering him to pay the utility bills of the marital home. We affirm.

I. Background Facts and Proceedings.

Jill Hinnen appeals the district court ruling dismissing her application for order to show cause. Jill contends the district court erred in failing to find Robert Hinnen willfully violated the dissolution decree and abused its discretion in failing to impose sanctions. We find the district court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing the application. We affirm.

I. Background Facts and

Richard Barnes ("Father") appeals from the trial court's judgment modifying a prior dissolution judgment and child custody decree. We affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

On March 20, 2007, a Petition for Dissolution was filed. On July 8, 2008, the marriage between Father and Genevieve-Anne Gaudreau ("Mother") (collectively, "Parents") was dissolved, pursuant to a consent judgment ("Dissolution

Tulsa criminal defense lawyer Jeffrey Price Krigel represented Katrina Lynn Fox who was charged with:

Count # 1.

Count as Filed: FFP, FALSELY PERSONATE ANOTHER TO CREATE LIABILITY , in violation of 21 O.S. 1531.4

Date Of Offense: 04/17/2012

Party Name: Disposition Information: Defendant: FOX, KAT

K.S.A. 40-3403(h) provides that a health care provider qualified for coverage under the Health Care Stabilization Fund created by the Health Care Provider Insurance Availability Act (HCPIAA), K.S.A. 40-3401 et seq., "shall have no vicarious liability or responsibility for any injury . . . arising out of the rendering of or the failure to render professional services . . . by any other health care

¶1 In this dissolution of marriage proceeding, we granted certiorari review to consider whether accrued vacation and sick leave may be considered marital property subject to division under section 14-10-113, C.R.S. (2013), of the Uniform Dissolution of Marriage Act (“UDMA”). In this case, the trial court entered an order dividing the value of the husband’s accrued vacat

¶1 Petitioner, Mark Ashly Steen, was convicted in county court of misdemeanor offenses. In this original proceeding pursuant to C.A.R. 21, Steen challenges orders issued by the county court and district court denying his motions under section 16-2-114(6), C.R.S. (2013), and Crim. P. 37(f) to stay execution of his sentence pending his appeal of the convictions to the district court. We issu

Christopher Horvath sued Joya Minard and Aaron Minard on libel and slander theories claiming:

1. The Plaintiff is a resident of Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma.

2. The Defendant is a resident of Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma.

3. Mr. Minard is a resident of Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma.

4. The incidents giving rise to this cause of action occurred in Tulsa C

¶1 Pursuant to Section I, Paragraph 3(d), Montana Supreme Court Internal Operating Rules, this case is decided by memorandum opinion and shall not be cited and does not serve as precedent. Its case title, cause number, and disposition shall be included in this Court’s quarterly list of noncitable cases published in the Pacific Reporter and Montana Reports.

¶2 Valery Ann O�

¶1 Clark Bruce Kidd (Husband) appeals from several orders of the trial court related to the dissolution of his marriage to Elaine J. Kidd (Wife). We affirm.

Kidd v. Kidd

20120460-CA 2 2014 UT App 26

BACKGROUND1

¶2 Husband and Wife married on March 13, 1980, and divorced on March 9, 2012, after thirty-two years of marriage. Although the parties were able to agree o

¶1 Colter Thomas Allen (Husband) and Lacee C. Allen (Wife) were married on June 13, 2009, and are the parents of a young daughter (Daughter). Husband filed for divorce in 2010, and after a bench trial, the trial court awarded Husband physical custody of Daughter, refused Wife’s request for alimony and attorney fees, and awarded both the marital home and the marital debt to Husband. Wife

Preben Olesen ["Olesen"] appeals a partial final judgment entered against him and in favor of General Electric Capital Corporation ["GECC"], in which the trial court dismissed all claims against GECC for failure to state a cause of action and denied Olesen's ore tenus motion to amend his Second Amended Complaint.

On November 25, 2009, Olesen filed a complaint against Lowndes, Drosdick, Dost

Jesse LaFountain, the Former Husband, appeals from the final judgment dissolving his marriage to Shanna LaFountain, the Former Wife. He argues that the trial court erred in awarding the Former Wife the majority of timesharing with the minor child and in calculating child support. Because the trial court's child support calculation is not supported by the record, we reverse that portion of the fina

In this postjudgment marital dissolution proceeding, the parties extensively litigated the division of the proceeds from the sale of a parcel of community real property. On appeal from the resulting order, appellant Linda Boblitt (wife) contends -- among other things -- that the trial court violated her right to due process because, less than a month before the postjudgment evidentiary hearing, th

In May 2012, Paul F. Mik, Jr., Lee Ann Mik, and PALS Enterprises, LLC (collectively, “the Miks”) filed suit against the Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”), arguing that they were unlawfully evicted from their rental home after their landlord defaulted on her mortgage and the property was sold at a foreclosure sale. The district court granted Freddie Mac�

Embroiled in protracted, acrimonious child custody proceedings with her former spouse, Larisa Bergeron (appellant) sued psychologist and family court child custody evaluator Robert Boyd, Ph.D. (respondent) for breach of contract, negligence, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The acts complained of included the issuance of an interim custody order that restricted appellant’s

If a party dies between the time the court orally grants a judgment of dissolution and the time the court enters a written judgment of dissolution does the court lose jurisdiction to enter such judgment nunc pro tunc? For the reasons explained below, we hold the court does not lose jurisdiction to enter a nunc pro tunc judgment.

Alejandro and Thelma Martin were married on March 3, 2008 and

Travisha Mangwiro and Tinashe Mangwiro (the Mangwiros) appeal the district court’s dismissal of their complaint for failure to state a cause of action. We affirm.

Case: 13-10520 Document: 00512521976 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/04/2014

No. 13-10520

I

Accepting as true the factual allegations contained in the Mangwiros’ complaint,1 the facts are as follows. Trav

Embroiled in protracted, acrimonious child custody proceedings with her former spouse, Larisa Bergeron (appellant) sued psychologist and family court child custody evaluator Robert Boyd, Ph.D. (respondent) for breach of contract, negligence, and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The acts complained of included the issuance of an interim custody order that restricted appellant’s

Alexander Christian Miles appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for a writ of error coram nobis. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm.

I

The parties are familiar with the previous proceedings and we summarize them only briefly. In July 2001, Miles applied for a K-1 visa to bring his fiancée from Cambodia to the United States for the purpos

Vidyawattie Matura ("the mother") appeals from a final judgment dissolving her marriage to Andrew Griffith ("the father"). The only issue on appeal is the trial court's decision to allow the father to have visitation with the parties' two sons in Jamaica, a non-signatory to the Hague Convention of the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction ("Hague Convention"). The father was deported to J

The former wife appeals an order holding her in contempt for failing to pay mortgages on the former marital home, and appointing a receiver to collect rental income from the former marital home in order to pay the mortgages. She argues, among other things, that contempt cannot be used to enforce equitable distribution, and that the former husband lacked standing to seek appointment of a receiver.

C.G. appeals a final judgment entered against him in his paternity action. C.G. is the undisputed biological father of H.G.-R. However, H.G.-R.'s biological mother was married to J.R. at the time of H.G.-R.'s birth, thereby establishing J.R. as H.G.-R.'s

-2-

legal father. After C.G. filed a verified complaint to establish paternity, he and the biological mother entered into a paterni

J.Q.2 and T.B. appeal from orders after the trial court denied J.Q.’s application for a domestic violence restraining order and request for spousal support against T.B. J.Q. filed an appeal arguing the trial court erred in denying her request for spousal support pending the resolution of her application for a restraining order and in denying her application for a domestic violence restraini