Salus Populi Suprema Lex Esto

About MoreLaw
Contact MoreLaw

Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 01-28-2011

Case Style: Dr. Bruce Saffran v. Johnson & Johnson

Case Number: 2:07-cv-00451-TJW

Judge: T. John Ward

Court: United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas

Plaintiff's Attorney: James W. Brady, Jr., Kenneth W Brothers, Ryan Holbrook Flax, Gary M Hoffman, Paul R Taskier and Jeremy Adam Cubert, Dickstein Shapiro, L.L.P., Washington, D.C. Eric M. Albritton and Debra Rochelle Coleman, Albritton Law, Firm, Longview, Texas; Matthew Richard Rodgers and Danny Lloyd Williams, Williams Morgan & Amerson PC, Houston, Texas

Defendant's Attorney: Diana S Breaux, Gregory L Diskant, Scott Barry Howard, Lynde F Lintemuth, Sean Marshall, Kimberly Parke, Irena Royzman, Christopher M Strong, Michael J Timmons, Catherine A Williams, Herman H Yue and Kathleen Marie Crotty, Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler, New York, New York; Richard Alan Sayles, Mark Daniel Strachan and Eve L Henson, Sayles | Werbner, Dallas, Texas;

Description: Dr. Bruce Saffran sued Johnson & Johnson on a patent infringement theory claiming that the stents manufactured and sold by it infringed a patent issued to him.

The defenses asserted by Johnson & Johnson are not available.

Outcome: Plaintiff's verdict for $428 million.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:


Home | Add Attorney | Add Expert | Add Court Reporter | Sign In
Find-A-Lawyer By City | Find-A-Lawyer By State and City | Articles | Recent Lawyer Listings
Verdict Corrections | Link Errors | Advertising | Editor | Privacy Statement
© 1996-2018 MoreLaw, Inc. - All rights reserved.