M ORE L AW
LEXAPEDIA
Home
Verdicts
and
Decisions
Search Database
Recent Cases
Cases By Subject
Report A Case
Lawyers
Search Directory
By State & City
Add A
Lawyer Listing
Court
Reporters
Recent Listings
Search
By States & City
Add A Basic
Reporter Listing
Expert
Witnesses
Recent Listings
Search Directory
By State & Expertise
Add A Basic
Expert Witness
Listing
MoreLaw
Store
The Store
Recent Listings
(Search)
Add A Basic
Classified Ad
Links
County Seats
State Links
Information
About MoreLaw
Contact MoreLaw

Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Date: 03-21-2008

Case Style: Justinian Rweyemamu v. Michael Cote, Dishop of Diocese of Norwich

Case Number: 06-1041-cv

Judge: John M. Walker, Jr.

Court: United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on appeal from the District of Connecticut, New Haven County

Plaintiff's Attorney: Norman A. Pattis, Bethany, Connecticut

Defendant's Attorney: Meredith Diette, Brown Jacobson, P.C., Norwich, Connecticut

Description: Alleging that the Roman Catholic Diocese of Norwich, through its Bishop, misapplied canon law in denying him a requested promotion and, ultimately, in terminating him, Father Justinian Rweyemamu, an African-American Catholic priest, claims racial discrimination in a Title VII suit against the Bishop and the Diocese. After the district court dismissed the suit pursuant to the "ministerial exception," Father Justinian appealed. The question we must decide is whether, under the First Amendment, Title VII is unconstitutional as applied in this case. In reaching this constitutional question, we distinguish this case from our decision in Hankins v. Lyght, 441 F.3d 96, 99 (2d Cir. 2006), which held that a federal statute, the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA) of 1993, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000bb, 2000bb-1 to -4, governed the merits of an age discrimination action against a church.

* * *

http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov:8080/isysnative/RDpcT3BpbnNcT1BOXDA2LTEwNDEtY3Zfb3BuLnBkZg== /06-1041-cv_opn.pdf#xml=http://www.ca2.uscourts.gov:8080/isysquery/irl36b1/1/hilite

Outcome: The judgment of the district court is hereby AFFIRMED.

Plaintiff's Experts: Unknown

Defendant's Experts: Unknown

Comments: None



 
Home | Add Attorney | Add Expert | Add Court Reporter | Sign In
Find-A-Lawyer By City | Find-A-Lawyer By State and City | Articles | Recent Lawyer Listings
Verdict Corrections | Link Errors | Advertising | Editor | Privacy Statement
© 1996-2012 MoreLaw.com, Inc.