M ORE L AW
LEXAPEDIA
Home
Verdicts
and
Decisions
Search Database
Recent Cases
Cases By Subject
Report A Case
Lawyers
Search Directory
By State & City
Recent Additions
Add A
Lawyer Listing
Court
Reporters
Recent Listings
Search
By States & City
Add A Basic
Reporter Listing
Expert
Witnesses
Recent Listings
Search Directory
By State & Expertise
Add A Basic
Expert Witness
Listing
MoreLaw
Store
The Store
Recent Listings
(Search)
Add A Basic
Classified Ad
Links
County Seats
State Links
National Links
International Pages
Information
MoreLaw Marketing
Contact MoreLaw


Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Date: 12-03-1998

Case Style: Williams Construction Company v. Pryor Nitrogen, Inc. and Willard Grain & Feed, Inc., d/b/a Wil-Gro Fertilizer, et al.

Case Number: CJ-97-238

Judge: James D. Goodpaster

Court: District Court, Mayes County, Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney: Mark D. Lyons and Charles T. Plake of Lyons & Clark, Tulsa, Oklahoma

Defendant's Attorney: James L. Kincaid, Cheryl Cooper, and R. Michael Cole of Crowe & Dunlevy, Tulsa, Oklahoma

Description: Pryor Nitrogen contracted with Williams Construction and its subcontractor, Apex Plumbing, Heating & Piping, Inc., to construction three chemical plants at the Wil-Gro Fertilizer plant at the Mid-America Industrial Park near Pryor, Oklahoma, for approximately $10,000,000. The construction was delayed and additional costs were incurred by the contractors due to actions of the owner. After negtiations with the owner proved unsuccessful, Williams Construction and Apex filed mechanics' and materialmans' liens on the property. Subsequently, a lawsuit was brought for breach of contract, and to foreclose the liens. Pursuant to a clause in the contract, Pryor Nitrogen filed a demand for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association alleging that Williams and Apex were liabile for delay damages of $4,950,000. The matter was order to arbitration according to the rules of the American Arbitration Association, Construction Industry Tribunal. At the arbitration, Williams and Apex put forth evidence that construction was delayed due to the improper management of the project by Pryor Nitrogen and Wil-Gro Fertilizers by the late delivery of major pieces of equipment and the discovery of asbestos on the jobsite. Additionally, Williams and Apex alleged that Pryor Nitrogen and Wil-Gro failed to provide accurate and complete plans and drawsings and failed to provide a comprehensive project schedule. After arbitration heaing, which lasted eight days, the arbitration panel returned an award in favor of Williams and Apex which totaled $966,383.68.

Outcome: Parties settled for $1,000,000

Plaintiff's Experts: Leo Hilinsky, Claremore, Oklahoma, construction practices expert and International Consulting Enterprises, Inc., Colorado Springs, Colorado

Defendant's Experts: Richard Roy, Austin, Texas, construction practices and claims expert and Peter Hagan, C.P.A., Dallas, Texas, accountant about damages.

Comments: None



 
Home | Add Verdict | Add Expert | Add Court Reporter | Articles
Find-A-Lawyer By City | Find-A-Lawyer By State and City
Verdict Corrections | Link Errors | Advertising | Editor | Privacy Statement
© 1996-2009 MoreLaw.com, Inc.
MoreLaw Marketing
MoreLaw Marketing
Free Marketing

For Lawyers, Forensic Experts, Court Reporters and Other Businesses
Advertise on this site