M ORE L AW
LEXAPEDIA
Home
Verdicts
and
Decisions
Search Database
Recent Cases
Cases By Subject
Report A Case
Lawyers
Search Directory
By State & City
Add A
Lawyer Listing
Court
Reporters
Recent Listings
Search
By States & City
Add A Basic
Reporter Listing
Expert
Witnesses
Recent Listings
Search Directory
By State & Expertise
Add A Basic
Expert Witness
Listing
MoreLaw
Store
The Store
Recent Listings
(Search)
Add A Basic
Classified Ad
Links
County Seats
State Links
Information
About MoreLaw
Contact MoreLaw


Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Date: 10-14-2012

Case Style: Lonnie Lewis v. New Beginning Fellowship Church of God in Christ Foundation

Case Number: CJ-2012-4374

Judge: Linda G. Morrissey

Court: District Court, Tulsa County, Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney: Lawrence AG Johnson

Defendant's Attorney:

Description: Lonnie Lewis sued New Beginning Fellowship Church of God in Christ Foundation, Pearlee Flemons, Larry King, Mark Norman, Edwards Stevenson, Ellis Stevenson, Pamela Taylor, Joann Titsworth and Josh Titsworth on quite title theories claiming:

Plaintiff is attorney in fact under power of attorney of New Testament Pentecostal Church House of Prayer, a religious corporation (hereinafter termed New Testament). New Beginning Fellowship Church of God in Christ Foundation, a religious corporation (hereinafter termed New Beginning) executed a deed and recorded it in the Office of the County Clerk of Thlsa Count as document 2008124846 which deed was declared a nullity in Case No. CJ-2007, 5596 as executed by the above named individual Defendants as Members; however, said order did not include New Beginning and said deed is a cloud on the title of Plaintiff, Plaintiff served a demand with curative deed to service agent of New Beginning on August 7, 2012; that Defendants refuse to execute a deed to remove said cloud; that said conveyance by New Beginning is a claim of right, title, claim, trust or interest which needs to be removed of record. That said deed conveyance is a sham legal process.

Count I

Plaintiff is in peaceful possession of the property and prays for decree quieting his title and declaring all Defendants have no claim of title and that said defendants named herein claims some right, title, lien, estate, encumbrance, claim, assessment or interest in and to the real property involved herein, adverse to plaintiff which constitutes a cloud upon the title of plaintiff and defendants have no right, title, lien, estate, encumbrance, claim, assessment or interest, either in law or in equity, in and to the real property involved herein. Plaintiff claims attorney fees be assessed against all defendants per 12 O.S. § 1141.

Count II

Plaintiff prays for mandatory injunction against all Defendants requiring them to execute and deliver a good and sufficient quit claim deed to Plaintiff quit claiming all right, title, or interest in the property described in Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof as if copied at length herein.

Count III

That said deed, is a sham process as defined by 12 0.8. §1533; that Plaintiff has expended attorney fees and suffered slander of title for which he prays damages of three times the amount thereof in excess of $10,000, and costs.


The Defendants did not file answers.

Outcome: Dismissed with prejudice by Plaintiff.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



 
Home | Add Attorney | Add Expert | Add Court Reporter | Sign In
Find-A-Lawyer By City | Find-A-Lawyer By State and City | Articles | Recent Lawyer Listings
Verdict Corrections | Link Errors | Advertising | Editor | Privacy Statement
© 1996-2012 MoreLaw.com, Inc.