Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 11-05-2015

Case Style: Michael Ray Hargis v. Jeffery Selvidge and Megan Selvidge

Case Number: CJ-2012-1110

Judge: Dana Kuehn

Court: District Court, Tulsa County, Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney: Carl Barnes

Defendant's Attorney: Erik Houghton and Richard Selman

Description: Tulsa, OK - Michael Ray Hargis sued Jeffery Selvidge and Megan Selvidge on auto negligence theories claiming:

1. The Plaintiff is an individual and is a resident of Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma. The Defendants are each residents of Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma. This is an action for damages arising from conduct which occurred in Tulsa County, State of Oklahoma. This court has jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter and venue is properly established before this
court.
2. On or about July 3, 2007 the Defendant Megan Selvidge, while operating a vehicle she
owed with the Defendant Jeffery Selvidge, caused an accident which caused a collision with
Plaintiff’s vehicle near the location of where Interstate 244 merges with Interstate approximately
2 miles east of 129th E. Ave., Tulsa, Oklahoma.
3. The Defendant Megan Selvidege owed a duty to the Plaintiff to exercise reasonable care towards the Plaintiff when operating said vehicle.
CE
4 The Defendant Jeffery Selvidge owed a duty to the Plaintiff to exercise reasonable care
towards the Plaintiff when allowing other persons to operate a vehicle said Defendant owns
5. The Defendants failed to properly exercise the above stated duties..
6. The Plaintiff was suffered damages as a direct and proximate result of said failure on behalf of the Defendants.
7. The Plaintiff’s vehicle received certain damage which caused a loss of value to Plaintiff’s vehicle.
8. The Plaintiff has experienced physical injury and resulting emotional stress, pain and suffering, and permanent disability. The Plaintiff has been ilirther damaged by incurring various
medical bills and other monetary loss as a result of the Defendant’s conduct. Said damages exceed the sum of $10,000.00.
Wherefore the Plaintiff requests judgment against the Defendant for the damages as stated above, and such other legal or equitable relief which may be determined to be proper.
Wherefore the Plaintiff requests judgment against the Defendant in an amount which will compensate for the damages as stated above, and such other legal or equitable relief which may be determined to be proper. Plaintiff does not waive right to request a jury trial in this cause.

Outcome: Settled for an undisclosed sum and dismissed with prejudice.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: