Date: 11-01-2012
Case Style: Stephanie Winters v. Lauren Alkek
Case Number: CJ-2011-1444
Judge: Lori Walkley
Court: District Court, Cleveland County, Oklahoma
Plaintiff's Attorney: Trevor Furlong
Defendant's Attorney: Laurie A. Fong
Description: COMES NOW, the Plaintiff, Stephanie Winters by and through her attorney of record, Trevor J. Furlong and for her cause of action against the Defendant, Lauren Alkek allege and state as follows;
1. That the Plaintiff; Stephanie Winters is a resident of Norman, Cleveland County, Oklahoma.
2. That the Defendant Lauren Alkek, is a resident of Victoria, Victoria County, Texas.
3. That the motor vehicle collision which gives rise to this action occurred in Norman, Cleveland County, Oklahoma.
4. That this Court has jurisdiction and venue in this matter.
5. That the Plaintiff was without fiult and that the damages from the collision were directly and proximately caused by and due to the negligence of the Defendant set forth below.
6. That on or about February 16,2011, Stephanie Winters was operating a motor vehicle heading westbound on Robinson St at Porter Avenue. The Plaintiff, Stephanie Winters stopped for pedestrians, when the Defendant, Lauren Alkek, failed to stop and struck the Plaintiff in the rear of the vehicle.
7. That as the result of the negligence of the Defendant and the resulting collision of the vehicles heretofore mentioned, Stephanie Winters suffered bodily injury.
8. As a direct and proximate result of the negligence of the Defendant the following damages were caused, for which damages are claimed by the Plaintiff in an amount in excess of $75,000: Past, present and future physical pain and suffering; past, present and future medical expenses; and permanent injuries. Plaintiff Stephanie Winters suffered property damage.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff prays for judgment against the Defendant in an amount in excess of $75,000.00, their costs, and such other and further relief to which they may be entitled.
COMES NOW the Defendant, Lauren Alkek, @eremafter “Defendant”), and in answer to the Plaintiffs Petition states as follows:
1. Defendant is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of paragraph I of the Plaintiff’s Petition and demands strict proof thereof and therefore denies the same.
2. Defendant admits paragraph 2 of the Plaintiffs Petition.
3. Defendant is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of paragraph 3 of the Plaintiffs Petition and demands strict proof thereof and therefore denies the same.
4. Defendant is without sufficient knowledge or information to form a belief as to the truth of the allegations of paragraph 4 of the Plaintiffs Petition and demands strict proof thereof and therefore denies the same.
5. Defendant denies paragraph 5 of the Plaintiffs Petition.
6. Defendant denies paragraph 6 of the Plaintiffs Petition.
7. Defendant denies paragraph 7 of the Plaintiffs Petition.
8. Defendant denies paragraph 8 of the Plaintiffs Petition.
WHEREFORE, Defendant, Lauren Ailcek, prays that the Plaintiff, Stephanie Winters, take nothing by way of the Petition, that Defendant be awarded reasonable attorney’s fees and costs and such other relief as the Court deems just and equkable.
Outcome:
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: