Date: 06-19-2012
Case Style: Tracy Alan Moore v. Alstrial Compton
Case Number: CJ-2010-8818
Judge: Bryan C. Dixon
Court: District Court, Oklahoma County, Oklahoma
Plaintiff's Attorney: Greg S. Wilson, Wilson Law Firm, P.L.L.C., Shawnee, Oklahoma
Defendant's Attorney: Richard A. Bruce, Noland, Pettigrew & Bruce, P.C., Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
Description: Tracy Alan Moore sued Alstrrial Compton on an auto negligence theory.
ANSWER
COMES NOW the Defendant Aistrial Compton, by and through counsel, who generally denies each and every claim and allegation as contained in Plaintiffs’ Petition except as more specifically set forth herein:
1. The Defendant is without sufficient knowledge or information to admit or deny those claims and allegations contained in paragraphs 2 and 3of Plaintiffs’ Petition and therefore demands strict proof thereof.
2. The Defendant admits that an automobile accident took place between the parties on the date as set forth in Paragraph 1 of Plaintiffs’ Petition. The Defendant denies those remaining claims and allegations contained in paragraph 1 of Plaintiffs’ Petition and therefore demands strict woof thereof.
For further answer and defense the Defendant states as follows:
First Affirmative Defense
The negligence if any of the parties and any relevant non-parties will be developed during discovery and the Defendant specifically reserves the right to plead defenses as to contributory and comparative negligence at the time of pretrial.
Second Affirmative Defense
Whether Plaintiffs have acted to mitigate their damages will be developed during discovery and the Defendant specifically reserves the right to plead that defense at the time of pretrial.
Third Affirmative Defense
Whether any portion of the Plaintiffs’ claims have been barred by the statute of limitations or by the doctrines of wavier, release and accord-and-satisfaction will be developed during discovery and defendant specifically reserves the right to plead those affirmative defenses at the time of pretrial.
Fourth Affirmative Defense
Whether the Plaintiffs suffer from any preexisting or post-arising medical condition will be developed during discovery and the Defendant specifically reserves the right to plead those defenses at the time of pretrial.
WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED Defendant prays that the action against him be dismissed and he be awarded costs such as the court may determine is just.
Outcome: Settled and dismissed
Plaintiff's Experts:
Defendant's Experts:
Comments: