Please E-mail suggested additions, comments and/or corrections to Kent@MoreLaw.Com.

Help support the publication of case reports on MoreLaw

Date: 09-07-2013

Case Style: Daniel Maddox v. Jennifer Hardridge

Case Number: CJ-2010-1017

Judge: Dan Kuehn

Court: District Court, Tulsa County, Oklahoma

Plaintiff's Attorney: Bob D. James

Defendant's Attorney: Michael H. Githens

Description: Daniel Maddox sued Jennifer Hardridge on a negligence theory.

The pre-trial order provided, in part:

Plaintiff: On February 23, 2008, Jennifer Hardridge, was traveling South bound on N. Cincinnati Ave., near the intersection of East Apache Street, when she ran a red light and collided with Mr. Maddox’s vehicle.

As a result of the Defendant’s negligence, Mr. Maddox has suffered bodily injury for which immediate medical attention was required. In addition, Defendant’s negligence has caused an exacerbation of Mr. Maddox’s previous medical condition. Mr. Maddox has endured and will continue to endure physical pain and suffering, as a result of the injuries sustained in this collision, and the exacerbation of previous medical concerns. In addition, the Maddox family has suffered property damages to their vehicle, a 2005 Buick Rendevous.

Defendant denied the nature and extent of Plaintiff's injuries and damages.

Plaintiff's claimed injuries were the result of pre-existing injuries, ailments or conditions that were neither caused nor aggravated by the involved accident.

Plaintiff's claimed injuries were the result of health care problems which developed subsequent to the date of the alleged accident, which were neither caused nor aggravated by the Defendant.

Defendant also claimed that the Plaintiff's medical care was not reasonable or necessary.

Outcome: Settled and dismissed with prejudice.

Plaintiff's Experts:

Defendant's Experts:

Comments:



Find a Lawyer

Subject:
City:
State:
 

Find a Case

Subject:
County:
State: